One problem with metro systems is that they tend to be monopolies run a by a single company or entity that does not need to compete to survive. In the absence of competition, it’s possible that the fare you pay may be higher than necessary.
That raises an interesting possibility. Could you save swapping tickets with another commuter during your journey so that the total you both pay is less? This kind of riskless profit-taking, or arbitrage, is common in capital markets where traders aggressively seek out and exploit these inefficiencies in the market. Could commuters also benefit?
Today we get an answer thanks to the work of Asif Haque, a data scientist at Twitter, who has analysed the possibility of fare arbitrage on the San Francisco metro system, known as BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit). Haque says that not only are opportunities for fare arbitrage possible on BART, they occur on more than 13 per cent of all pair-wise combinations of journeys offering considerable potential for savings.
Spotting fare-arbitrage opportunities is relatively straightforward in principle. Armed with an up-to-date fare guide, it’s simple to find out whether a particular pair of trips allows for arbitrage.
Haque gives the example of a commuter travelling from Millbrae Station to the south of San Francisco to the downtown station, Embarcadero, a journey that costs $4.50. Another commuter travelling from Glen Park in San Francisco to Berkeley on the other side of the Bay pays $4.20. So together they have to fork out $8.70.
But if these commuters meet and swap tickets, it’s possible for them to pay $5.10 (Millbrae to Berkeley) and $1.85 (Glen Park to Embarcadero) or a total of $6.95. That’s a saving of $1.70 or 20 per cent.
But while individual opportunities are simple to find, calculating them all is obviously harder. BART has 44 stations which allow 946 different trips. That means there are 446,985 unique pairs of trips which involves some serious number crunching..
Having done this calculating , Haque says that 60,334 of these pairs or 13.5 per cent, have an arbitrage opportunity of at least 5 cents. And 4,666 of these pairs of trips could save commuters at least $1. Haque has generously posted the full list of these 4,666 fares here.
So that raises an interesting opportunity for an adventurous entrepreneur: provide a service that connects commuters who have the potential to gain from fare arbitrage.
One potential problem is that fare arbitrage allows some users to game the system. It’s possible to imagine a pair of commuters who each travel from one side of a city to the other at considerable cost. But by swapping tickets in the city centre, they could both pay for a short commute in each others’ suburbs.
That’s clearly unfair—the price of the ticket certainly needs to reflect the cost of the journey. In that scenario, other commuters would end up subsidising the additional cost.
What’s more, there are perfectly good reasons why a metro system might purposely keep fares higher in some areas than others. The city might want to encourage people to live in certain areas, for example.
But where price differences arise purely through oversight, then why not allow a market to exploit these inefficiencies?
Answers please as comments!
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1401.8030 : Transit Fare Arbitrage: Case Study of San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) System