The Resolution of the Paradox of Lift: Projection in the S-T Waters — The Physics of Spirit — Chapter Six — Section 11

By Matthew Mossotti

To begin the discover of the spirit within the space-time waters, the fundamental force-function of the fluidic fabric of space-time must be firmly established. The primary force-function of the space-time waters is to display material energy projection in three spatial dimensions across the fourth dimension of time. By analogy, if a movie projector played a film into an empty darkness, the movie could never be seen apart from the film’s display on a screen. Likewise, apart from the display function of the non-material space-time waters, the projection of material energy cannot have any physical manifestation. Like the screen on which a film is shown allows the light from the projector to occupy its fabric by overtaking its spatial quadrants in two-dimensions of motive display, the space-time medium accepts the projections material energy in plasmatic, solid, liquid, and gaseous forms by allowing the material energies to overtake spatial quadrants of its fabric in three dimensions of motive display. However, where the movie screen “adopts” the light shown from the film projector such that the fabric shares the manifest being of the film it displays, the fluidic fabric of space-time does not share the manifest being of the material energy it displays. Rather, the fluidic fabric displays projections of material energy by exception to its own displacement, such that where mass-bearing matter is, the waters of space-time are not, such that the demarcation of three-dimensional material being reveals the spatial quadrants where the being of the fluidic fabric is being displaced, hence, display by exception. As it pertains to the distinctness exhibited by the fluidic fabric’s display of the three material energy projections in the terrestrial sphere (plasmatic lightning aside), solid objects are the most-distinct and are hence able to penetrate the material projections of liquids and gasses, with liquids and gasses as the second and third most-distinct, respectively. The projection of a solid is more distinct than the projections of liquid and gas because solids displace a greater volume of fluidic fabric per spatial unit of occupation than a liquid or gas — i.e. the fluidic fabric displays more distinctness in solid projections of material energy because solids displace a greater volume of fluidic fabric per spatial unit of occupation. This precept ultimately resolves for the enigma of the causation of the low pressure which always forms atop an airfoil in conjunction with the phenomenon of aerodynamic lift in powered flight. In the study of aerodynamics, prior to this Chapter’s resolution of the paradox, there were two theories on the causation of the phenomenon of lift with neither challenging the other. Rather, Newton’s Third Law (“for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction”) and Bernoulli’s Theorem almost seemed to complement one another, but neither theory (or both combined) could explain all the observed phenomena associated with aerodynamic lift (i.e. describing associative phenomena is not the same as explaining them). From his 1738 work on fluid dynamics (Hydrodynamica), Bernoulli’s Theorem states that the pressure of a fluid decreases as its velocity increases. This principle has been employed to describe lift as resulting from airflow atop the curved upper surface of an airplane wing where this air which travels across the top of the wing faster than the air moving under the flat surface on the bottom of the wing.

Because the speed of the air has increased above the wing, the pressure has decreased, and the application of Bernoulli’s theorem to air as a fluid mathematically describes the observed low pressure atop the wing. Some physicists have attributed this low pressure as causal to lift. However, if the low pressure atop the curved surface of the aircraft’s wing were causal to lift, then aircraft could not fly inverted (which they do) and aircraft with flat wings also achieve lift, making the commonsense model of lift from Newton’s Third Law more appealing. Simply, air has mass. When the angle of an aircraft’s wing pushes the airmass down, the equal and opposite force pushes the wing up and hence, aerodynamic lift. However, Newton’s Third Law cannot account for the lower pressure atop the wing, which is exhibited during powered flight irrespective of the shape of the airfoil (curved or flat). It must be noted that the application of Bernoulli’s Theorem does not explain the causation of the low pressure atop an aircraft wing, but only describes it in terms of fluid dynamics applied to air. This led early theoretical accounts of aerodynamic lift to treat air as a perfect fluid with zero viscosity and the fluidic property of incompressibility. Although these assumptions from the early Twentieth Century physicists allowed for more straightforward mathematical descriptions of aerodynamic lift, they are not empirically true of air within the atmosphere of the terrestrial sphere. Principally, the reduction of a fluid’s pressure from an increase of the fluid’s velocity describes “how” the air is moving faster over the curved top of a wing in terms of the speed at which the particles of air travel a greater distance than the particles beneath over the flat surface. However, Bernoulli’s Theorem does not articulate “why” the particles on top “need” to travel faster nor can it explain “why” the particles “need” to so tightly adhere to the shape of the wing (i.e. it would seem as if the air particles should fly in a straight line back in the exact opposite direction to the flight of the aircraft rather than hugging the surface of the wing). This work now presents the resolution to the paradox of the low-pressure area atop the airwing observed in conjunction with the aerodynamic force of lift:

· In the aerodynamics of lift, the airflow’s exhibition of the fluid dynamics which are mathematically consistent with the properties of a perfect fluid can be explained if and only if the particles of air can be shown to be adhering to the behavior of a perfect fluid which is governing their motions.

o The perfect fluid to which the air particles adhere in their motions around the airwing to produce a low-pressure area is the fluidic fabric of space-time which interacts with the same airwing both gravitationally and in the display of the projected material energy in space as the airwing moves through time.

· The fluidic fabric of space-time causes the air to follow its underlying motions as it displays the projected material energy of the airwing moving through quadrants of space-time waters, leaving a “wake” in the fluidic space-time fabric.

o The waters of space-time carry along the particles of air as they pull the gasses of the air to perfectly refill the area of volume of their displacement from the solid surface of the wing as the projection of solid material energy passes through the spatial display of the fluidic fabric.

§ The solid material projection of the airfoil displaces greater volume of fluidic space-time per unit of spatial occupation than the gaseous air and thus leaves the proportionate vacuum in its stead which must be instantly re-enveloped and hence, the air conforms its motion to the movements of the space-time waters which are giving physical display to the projected material energy of the air.

As noted, solid projections of material energy are more distinct displays of the fluidic fabric than liquids and gasses because solids displace a greater volume of the fluidic fabric per spatial unit of occupation. The perfect adherence of air particles to the shape of the wing (at an increased speed where curved) is a function of the fluidic fabric pulling the less-distinct air into the differential vacuum of fluidic fabric left from its own displacement by the solid airwing through time. The low-pressure area atop the wing is an expression of the air’s conformity to Bernoulli’s Theorem which describes the governing laws of fluid dynamics exhibited in the fluidic space-time fabric to which the material energy projections of air particles cohere. Hence, the low-pressure area on an airwing is not causal to lift, but an expressed effect of fluidic space-time on air particles in the motion of an airwing. In the phenomena of aerodynamic lift, Newton’s Third Law is therefore sufficient to describe the causal physics as a function of the action-reaction principle of material energy interaction (the same of course also being true in the opposite downforce from the upward airflow created by the spoiler system on a racecar). The observed low-pressure area which is mathematically described by Bernoulli’s Theorem of fluid dynamics is sufficient to describe the behavioral dynamics of the space-time fluid’s display of the differential displacement of projected material energies in motion, as revealed in the airflow’s motive adherence to the underlying motions of the fluidic fabric on which the air particles are displayed. Insofar as the air particles exhibit perfect coherence to the motive shape of underlying force-function of the space-time waters to refill the differential of their own displacement from solids and gasses, the paradox of aerodynamic lift finds complete resolution in the fluid dynamics of the space-time waters’ display of projected material energies. The net resolution to the paradoxical conundrum of the causation of the low pressure atop an airwing or below a spoiler on a racecar is that the low pressure does not cause lift or downforce, respectively. As an associative phenomenon of aerodynamic lift, this work straightforwardly asserts that the low pressure exhibits an effect on the shape of the airflow imposed by the fluidic fabric of space-time as the non-material waters refill their differential displacement from a solid versus a gas. The air particles precisely adhere to the motions of the fluidic substance which gives display to their projected material energy in the airflow. This swift and relatively simple resolution to a paradox which had persisted for more than a century serves as an initial validator of the fluidic nature of the non-material substance of space-time by solving for the comprehensive empirical observations associated with the peculiarities of terrestrial air conforming to the mathematically defined phenomena of perfect fluids. This conceptual modeling of the force interactions of the material and non-material energies will serve as the baseline for the remainder of this Chapter’s treatment of the physical dynamics of the fluidic space-time substance and photoelectrical phenomena. As will be candidly observed in the subsequent dissolution of the remaining two paradoxes and four mysteries of physics modern to the era of this writing, in linear theorization, the paramount conceptualization of the fluidic nature of the non-material substance of space-time knocks down the major enigmas of observed phenomena like well-aligned dominoes.

Looking for more to read? Check out the previous section Paradoxes & Mysteries: Solving for Salient Space-Time Phenomena or start at the beginning of this chapter with Mythos & Scientific Inquiry in the Human Experiment, read all of the released sections from Chapter VI: The Physics of Spirit — the Life Force in the Waters of Space-Time sequentially, learn more about Matthew Mossotti’s philosophical masterpiece Physics of Spirit: On The Phenomenology of Heaven & Hell, or explore SpeciMen Trilogy and download Episode Zero: The Meraviglia Revelation, the 40 page prequel to the 440 page Epic, for free.