The Undetectable and Undeniable Force in the Waters — The Physics of Spirit — Chapter Six — Section 14
By Matthew Mossotti
Light causes waves in the space-time medium, and those waves express the fluidic nature of the space-time medium through their energetic influence within it. As a self-evident corollary to the resolution of the Young versus Einstein Paradox of Light, the space-time medium must causally express its physical presence through its detectable energetic influence upon other systems. A system cannot be an exclusive recipient of cause but must itself exhibit its own causality to establish the reality of its being. Therefore, the energetic existence of the substance of the fluidic fabric of space-time cannot be limited to the supposed effects upon its constitution from the interactions with the causation of light particles. Rather, the space-time waters must be shown to distinctly express causal energetic presence elsewhere. Indeed, the waterish fabric of space-time causally exhibits its energetic presence where it has been shown to be curving to causally exhibit gravitational force upon bodies of material energy. As postulated by Einstein’s General Relativity (1915 AD) and proved by Sir Arthur Eddington (1919 AD), the energetically waterish medium of space-time fabric curves upon the matter which situationally displaces it, conveying the physical presence of the non-material energy upon material energy in the reciprocal force of gravity. As the waterish medium of the observable cosmos, the tenacity of the curvature of the fluidic fabric of space-time fabric is the quantitative determinate of the expression of the gravitational force towards the center of the material energy displacement of the non-material energy. In sharp accordance with the model of Archimedes’ Principle on buoyancy, this work will now introduce the observation on the relative tenacity of the gravitational force as a function of the quantity of the material energy displacement of the fluidic space-time medium. These observations will further bolster the conceptualization that the non-material energetic substance which serves as the container of the cosmos behaves in strikingly similar modes to terrestrial water. Insofar as terrestrial waters display the emergent property of buoyancy on solid objects displacing their presence, the space-time waters display the same emergent property upon the bodies of material energy which displace them. The buoyancy equations which describe the upward pressure relayed by terrestrial water upon its displacement by solid objects convey the emergent properties of the amorphous liquid substance. A fundamental phenomenon of water molecules is the emergent property which describes how they “all work together with one another” to produce the upward force against their collective displacement by attributing buoyancy upon the surface area of the solid objects which displace them. To re-quote Graham Templeton, “the properties of water, the high boiling point and surface tension that help to give it its amazing properties, are not a product of any one water molecule but of the interaction between those molecules. Put differently, the properties of a water molecule are fundamental, while the properties of water overall are emergent. The classical view of space-time is that its properties are fundamental, an intrinsic aspect of space-time as the basic backdrop of existence. The liquid theory of space-time says that its properties are emergent, the product of interaction between units about which we currently know nothing at all (Treating Space-Time Like a Fluid May Unify Physics, Graham Templeton).” As is henceforward shown in this Chapter, much can be applied from the pressure equations of water displacement to describe gravity as a function of the material displacement of space-time waters.
General Relativity was born to resolve a paradox which emerged from the keystone claim of Special Relativity, namely, that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. Newton’s equations had been rigorously and thoroughly proven reliably and accurately measure the effects of the force of gravity upon material energy systems. Although Newton overtly absolved himself from theorizing on the “causes and seats” of the gravitational force which his equations were only designed to measure the effects, subsequent physicists began to conceptualize gravity as an intrinsic attractive force of material energy that constantly persists between bodies of material energy in zero-time (the “Newtonian Mechanics” which postulated a “matter-attracts-matter” principle have been largely attributed to Newton (falsely), but Newton did not feign to understand the principle causes and seats of the gravitational force of which his equations were only designed to describe in effect). However, Einstein’s claim in Special Relativity that nothing could travel faster than the speed of light posed a direct conceptual threat to the model which maintained the “innate material self-attraction principle” which, by Einstein’s day, had become a fixed addendum to the Newtonian model of gravitational description. Physicists of Einstein’s day posed the following question: if the force of gravity is caused by an intrinsic material attraction between two bodies (e.g. the Sun and the Earth), if the Sun were to explode or otherwise instantaneously disappear, given eight and a half minutes for light to travel from the Sun to the Earth, would the Earth be immediately experience the effect of the missing force or would it take the full eight and a half minutes for the Earth to experience the loss of the Sun’s gravity? If the force of gravity were proven to persistently and innately exist between two massive bodies in zero-time as an intrinsic attractive property of matter, as posited by the addenda to Newton’s highly verified equations, the Earth would instantaneously experience the loss of the gravitational effect of the Sun. However, according to the speed limit of the universe established by Special Relativity (the speed of light), the loss of the Sun’s gravity on Earth would be felt a minimum of eight and a half minutes after the Sun’s hypothetical vanishing. To resolve this debate, Einstein developed General Relativity to show that gravity is not a proprietary function of intrinsic material energy attraction between material objects. Rather, Einstein theorized that gravity is caused by the energetic expression of a “third-party medium,” which he called “the fabric of space-time.” The gravity equations of General Relativity and Newton’s Law of Gravity agree to the thirteenth decimal point, but the causal force shown in General Relativity continues to revolutionize physics, even up through this present work. Newton created the calculus to describe the motivational laws of the gravitational effect and only later did physicists adjoin an additional claim that gravity was an attractive force that existed between matter as an intrinsic property of material energy. Because the later addendum to Newton’s gravity equation treated the force of gravity as arising from an attraction of two bodies of material energy mass, General Relativity challenged the “attraction principle” by placing the causal seat of the gravitational force in the fabric of space-time.
The addendum to Newton’s Principia was replaced by Einstein’s General Relativity, which showed that gravity does not function as an attractive force between two bodies, but rather as an expressive motivational function upon material energy from the space-time fabric inward upon the center of large bodies of material energy from all angles, a tenacious tendency which Einstein conceptualized as a “curvature.” The inventor of the Calculus (on Earth), arguably be the finest thinker in the humans’ history, Newton was entirely aware of the absence of causality in his Laws of Motion, writing the following disclaimer: “Mathematicus duntaxat est hie conceptus : Nam virium causas & sedes physicas jam non expend |“For I here only design to give a mathematical notion of these forces, without considering their physical causes and seats…(Principia, Definition VIII,).” Sir Isaac again furnished another disclaimer in his General Scholium, seeming to prophetically yield the conceptual connection between the emergent properties of the terrestrial oceans and the space-time sea: “Hactenus phenomena caelorum & marls nostri per vim gravitates exposui, sed causam gravitatis nondum assignavi… | Hitherto we have exposed the phenomena of the heavens and our sea by the power of gravity, but we have not yet assigned a cause…” In his General Relativity equations, Albert Einstein showed that space-time is a unified and emergent non-material substance which he conceptualized as proportionally curving according to the material volume of a massive body. Gravity derives from within an energetic non-material energetic substance which this work determines to be the fluidic fabric exhibiting the effect from material energy displacement of the space-time waters. To prove General Relativity, Einstein reasoned that the apparent-positions of the stars situated behind the sun would be different from their known actual-positions because their light would curve in accordance with the fabric as it warped from the gravity of the sun. The experiment to verify this claim ran as follows: looking at the stars which appear in the backdrop of the sky near the sun, if the space-time fabric does indeed curve around the sun, then the warping will display the stars as appearing closer to the position of the sun than they are known to be in actuality — i.e. the stars’ apparent-positions in the sky will be closer to the position of the sun than their real positions relative to the sun. The problem with conducting such an experiment, of course, is that the light of the stars cannot be seen when coming from behind the sun, so no measurements may be made of their apparent positions. However, with the experimental verifications of Sir Arthur Eddington that captured light curving around the sun during a total solar eclipse to prove this phenomenon, coined “stellar parallax,” gravity was finally verified as a function of the expressed energy in the curvature of the space-time medium towards the center of the massive body of material energy situated within its energetic presence. In the proven phenomenon of stellar parallax, the photons demonstrably adhere to the shape of the space-time medium in gravity fields. As such, where photons have been shown to cause the effect of light waves in the field of fluidic fabric, the effect of the field of gravity carried within the waters of space-time here causally exhibits an effect on the trajectory of the force-carrier particle of light.
This second exhibition of the interaction between the field which carries gravity and the particle which carries light completes half the presentation on the four-way correspondence between the force which displays and gravitationally motivates projected material energy and the force of light and electricity. What remains to be shown in this Chapter is the observed effect of the gravitational force-carrier particle on the photoelectrical field and the following Chapter has been wholly assigned to elucidate the observed effect of the photoelectrical field on the force-carrier particle of gravity. To begin, an understanding must be reached as to how the force-transfer of gravity to material energy occurs from the non-material energy within the fluidic fabric. The addendum to Newtonian mechanics presumed that the gravity “force” was manifest attraction from the within the mass of material bodies upon one other across distance in zero-time (this will be exhibited as the same problem in a conceptual gap in the presently theorized model for the force carried in magnetism, resolved by this work in the following Chapter). Einstein showed that masses are not themselves “attracted” to each other in any way whatsoever, but rather, that there is a connecting third party involved, specifically, the space-time medium. In straightforward terms, Einstein and Eddington proved that the force-function of gravity derives its energetic wherewithal from within the fabric of space-time, which this work presents as demonstrating fluidic properties. Einstein not only showed that the fabric of space-time imbued or carried the force of gravity, but, through the introduction of the non-material substance that teems with the celestial array of material energy, General Relativity shifted the conceptual paradigm of physical worldview from “emptiness filled with some material energy” to “emptiness filled with space-time substance filled with some material energy.” Effectively, in attributing the impetus of gravitational energy to the space-time substance, Einstein identified the proprietor of the mass-properties which are given to material energy. However, prior to this work, the re-envisioned conceptualization of spatial “emptiness” had not matured to treat the space-time substance as a substantial, albeit non-material, energetic medium. Up to the time of this work, the space-time fabric had been conceptually treated as a curving grid of a non-substantial vacuum that behaves in accord to gravitational law rather than properly modeling the substance of space-time as the energy which issues gravitational law. This conceptual immaturity had produced the “Problem of Mass,” whereby unnecessarily confused efforts to identify the material cause and seat of fundamental mass properties had ignored the causality of the non-material but energetically potent substance of space-time which acts as the proprietor of gravitational laws and as the formal exhibitor of all material energy. Not only does the non-material substance of space-time appropriate the mass-property of weight and motion via gravity, the waters of the heavens also give matter mass-properties in terms of the projected three-dimensional display by which matter receives its formal being in consistent square spatial volume. Straining to expeditiously mature the physical conceptualization of the mass-delivering energies of the waters of space-time, this work turns to the following basic precept of the four fundamental forces: energies interact ultimately in the subatomic infrastructure, such that energetic “deliveries and receipts” are made at the particle level.
Looking for more to read? Check out the previous section Resolving the Young/Einstein Paradox: The Chromatic Spectrum of Vibrations or start at the beginning of this chapter with Mythos & Scientific Inquiry in the Human Experiment, read all of the released sections from Chapter VI: The Physics of Spirit — the Life Force in the Waters of Space-Time sequentially, learn more about Matthew Mossotti’s philosophical masterpiece Physics of Spirit: On The Phenomenology of Heaven & Hell, or explore SpeciMen Trilogy and join The Resilience to receive a digital copy of Episode Zero of SpeciMen Trilogy and access to the secret Resilience Portal — an exclusive collection of letters and previews to Episodes I, II, & III.
