Other Efficiency Metrics

Part of The PIRATE Way — Stories about scaling up engineering teams.

Ivan Peralta
The PIRATE Way
2 min readSep 22, 2023

--

Building upon our previous discussions on software development and delivery metrics, we’ll now delve deeper into complementary approaches, focusing mainly on manual operations and the innovative SPACE metrics.

Photo by Jeremy Thomas on Unsplash

Manual / Operational Work

Just as operational activities are meticulously tracked in departments like finance, customer care, and professional services, it’s vital to monitor the extent of manual activity within product engineering teams.

Various strategies can be employed to accomplish this:

  1. Ticket Registration & Effort Measurement: Although this method provides detailed insights, it might not always find favor among engineers due to the associated administrative overhead.
  2. Event Tracking: This approach is oriented towards capturing events that hint at manual efforts, such as accessing production environments directly or operations carried out through internal admin tools.

It’s worth noting that the second approach might not be exhaustive. The optimal strategy largely hinges on your unique context.

The ultimate goal is to discern a holistic understanding of efficiency. Even if the data isn’t pinpoint accurate, such tracking can spotlight teams overwhelmed by manual firefighting or unexpected operational challenges. Identifying these patterns is the first step toward determining underlying issues and implementing solutions.

SPACE Metrics

Several frameworks aiming to bolster productivity have emerged in the ever-evolving world of software engineering. Of particular significance is the SPACE framework, birthed around 2019–2020. This brainchild of a dedicated team from Microsoft, comprising luminaries like Nicole Forsgren, Margaret-Anne Storey, Chandra Madilla, Thomas Zimmerman, Brian Houck, and Jenna Butler, rapidly gained traction for its holistic approach to measuring software engineering efficiency.

SPACE encapsulates five pivotal dimensions of productivity:

  • Satisfaction & Well-Being: Concentrating on engineers’ contentment levels, this considers aspects such as mission alignment, organizational culture, and available tools.
  • Performance: Here, the tangible results of engineering initiatives are evaluated.
  • Activity: This dimension casts light on the volume and type of tasks completed.
  • Collaboration & Communication: The focus here is on the maturity of collaboration techniques and communication methods within teams.
  • Efficiency & Flow: This assesses a team’s prowess in completing tasks seamlessly and making steady advancements.

The SPACE framework stands out for its adaptability and comprehensive nature, making it invaluable for teams of varied sizes, complexities, and organizational backdrops. As the 2020s unfolded, its stature as a critical tool for enhancing developer productivity became indisputable, offering a balanced approach to pinpointing improvement areas.

Building on our earlier recommendations, I would like to refer you to Abi Noda, the current CEO and Founder at DX. Their ongoing work promises a meticulous method to extract feedback from engineering teams, offering invaluable insights.

Remember: This is a blog post from the series “The PIRATE Way”.

--

--

Ivan Peralta
The PIRATE Way

CTO | Engineering Leader transforming ready-to-grow businesses into scalable organizations. For more information please visit https://iperalta.com/