Unity and Action: Protecting the Black Vote in the 2024 Election

Wayne Ince
The Polis
Published in
14 min readApr 9, 2024

--

Uncover the strategic tactics and shifting dynamics behind the battle for the Black vote in the upcoming US Election 2024. Image created by author using AI image software.

In the high-stakes game of American politics, the battle for the Black vote has taken center stage as the United States approaches the pivotal 2024 elections. The deeply polarized political landscape has witnessed a flurry of tactics aimed at both suppressing and mobilizing Black voters. I dive into the political swimming pool of multifaceted strategies and the various players deployed in this critical fight for electoral dominance. Through examining the GOP’s attacks on Critical Race Theory and the groundbreaking scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw, the significance of the Black vote, the GOP’s “Starting Five” round table (podcast-lite) led by failed GOP Presidential candidate Senator Tim Scott, the impact of voter suppression tactics, and the instrumental role played by Black women, we will seek to unravel the complex dynamics at play during these crucial political proceedings. After all, the country's fate might rest in the hands of young, minority, and female voters. Hyperbole aside, two ancient candidates battle each other for our future. We will become either another fascist state under Russian rule, much like Hungary, or we hold the line of democracy with all its flaws and imperfections to continue to fight against racism, sexism, and tyranny. One candidate is all about himself masquerading as the victim of criminal indictments while the other gentleman fights against congressional inertia and a lopsided conservative supreme court working hard to roll back all civil rights.

GOP attacks Critical Race Theory and pioneer Kimberlé Crenshaw

What began as academic theory has now become ground zero Republican attacks. Critical Race Theory (CRT), a scholarly framework developed to analyze the systemic roots of racism, has recently found itself at the forefront of political discourse. Its influential advocate, Kimberlé Crenshaw, has become a central figure of contention, with GOP critics deploying divisive rhetoric aimed at undermining her groundbreaking insights.

Just as the game of chess relies on deceptive maneuvers, the GOP’s assault on Critical Race Theory mirrors a calculated attack aimed at reshaping the narrative of racial equity. By vilifying Crenshaw and CRT, Republicans aim to distract from the broader conversation surrounding racial injustice, hoping to sway the battlefield in their favor. This sort of reminds me of Colin Kaepernick’s act of taking a knee during the National Anthem as a silent protest against police brutality. What got lost in the shuffle was law enforcement’s systematic erasure of black people? The white majority, led by Donald J. Trump, instead focused on an incorrectly perceived unpatriotic disrespect for the US Flag. Many veterans and right wing doused in red, white and blue called for a boycott of NFL games and burning jerseys. But, sport organizations after corporate advertising and social justice leader pressure used their sporting events to highlight “BlackLivesMatter” in the wake of George Floyd and many other’s death at the hands of police officers.

Many people widely recognize Kimberlé Crenshaw, a prominent scholar and professor of law, for her pioneering work in the fields of critical race theory and intersectionality. As a co-founder of the African American Policy Forum and the creator of the term “intersectionality,” Crenshaw has helped to shape contemporary discussions on race, gender, and social justice.

Furthermore, Critical Race Theory, though facing a backlash from conservative circles, has helped to shed light on the deep-seated inequalities that persist within societal structures. By examining how race intersects with law, politics, and culture, CRT challenge traditional narratives and encourages a more nuanced understanding of systemic racism.

However, critics argue that Critical Race Theory (CRT) goes beyond challenging traditional narratives and instead promotes a divisive and overly simplistic understanding of systemic racism. They argue CRT tends to essentialize racial categories and perpetuate a victimhood mentality, which can hinder genuine progress towards racial equality. Additionally, opponents claim that by focusing solely on race, CRT disregards other important factors, such as socioeconomic status and individual agency, in perpetuating disparities. They argue that addressing systemic inequalities effectively requires a more comprehensive approach that considers multiple intersecting factors. These arguments, as a whole, are nothing but hogwash. Besides the language used, I do not expect any improvements since everything is AI. Hogwash perfectly describes the critics’ diatribes against CRT, which derail meaningful discussions about race at both the state and national levels. Take, for example, Florida, led by Governor Ron DeSantis, who was unsuccessful in his bid for the GOP presidential candidacy. He manipulates the state’s classrooms to distort history, spreading outrageous claims like “slavery was actually beneficial.” His actions go beyond just limiting children’s access to a well-rounded education that embraces diverse cultures, races, and religions. His intent is to prevent future generations from developing empathy for the marginalized and oppressed, including women fighting for reproductive rights. This attack has far-reaching implications for various social communities and ideologies. What I know is education is essential for the next generation in a time of disinformation, and black communities require political representatives who work for their vote. The presidential election is important, but local, state and congressional seats hold more significance. Political representatives shape laws at these lower-level offices. The president is but one office often hindered by the other parties, the Senate, and the House of Representatives, the majority.

The Importance of the Black Vote in US Elections

The political power of the Black vote is incredibly significant. Data from previous elections have consistently shown the pivotal role that Black voters play in shaping the political landscape. In 2020 alone, Black voter turnout reached historic highs, with Black women, no surprise to me, emerging as the driving force behind this surge. The black women within my community and social circle consistently show their commitment to active voting. The Black vote has the power to tip the scales of power, making it a highly sought-after prize nationally by political factions across the spectrum.

Like a skilled surgeon in the operating room, the Black vote has the power to make a crucial difference in any election. Just as a single spark can ignite a wildfire and transform the landscape, the collective voice of Black voters has the potential to revolutionize the political landscape of the nation.

Furthermore, the Black vote is not a monolithic entity but a diverse tapestry of voices, encompassing a wide range of perspectives and priorities. While issues such as mental health, racial justice, economic equality, housing, social security, and healthcare access often feature prominently in discussions about the Black vote, it is essential to recognize the multifaceted nature of the Black electorate. Black voter’s race does not define solely black voters, but by their individual experiences, beliefs, and aspirations.

In addition, the Black vote holds great historical significance that cannot be disregarded. From the civil rights movement of the 1960s to present-day grassroots activism, Black voters have been at the forefront of driving social and political change in the United States. The legacy of Black voter mobilization serves as a reminder of the enduring power of collective action and civic engagement in shaping the democratic process.

One example of the legacy of Black voter mobilization is the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. During this pivotal time, African Americans organized and mobilized to fight against racial discrimination and secure their right to vote. Through collective action and civic engagement, activists such as Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, and countless others led protests, marches, and voter registration drives. Their efforts culminated in passing the Voting Rights Act 1965, which prohibited racial discrimination in voting practices. This landmark legislation expanded access to the ballot for African Americans, set a precedent for future civil rights movements, and underscored the enduring power of collective action in shaping the democratic process. What is the reason behind the GOP’s strong opposition to passing the John Lewis Voting Rights Act? Despite the shared rationale, the GOP has not contributed to the passing of the George Floyd Justice in the Policing Act. The motivation behind these laws is to prioritize the satisfaction of wealthy billionaire donors and further their ambiguous aim of disenfranchising all minority communities, spanning from immigrants to Muslims and beyond.

I also acknowledge there are counterpoints and counterarguments from the GOP and Far Right. However, it is essential to note that the motivation behind these laws may not solely be to prioritize the satisfaction of wealthy billionaire donors or disenfranchise minority communities. Supporters of these laws argue they implement them to prioritize national security, uphold the rule of law, and protect the overall well-being of the country. They believe these laws are necessary to maintain social cohesion (re: pacify rabid supporters), address economic concerns (re: top-down economy), and safeguard cultural values for the majority. While there may be instances where the implementation of such laws may have unintended consequences, it is essential to consider the broader motivations I discussed and the potential benefits and their recipients that proponents of these laws perceive.

GOP Tim Scott Rolls out “Starting Five” Roundtable Targeting Black Voters

Recognizing the influence of the Black vote, Senator Tim Scott has masterminded a strategic move in the GOP’s playbook. The “Starting Five” roundtable takes center stage, seeking to engage and court Black voters. This initiative assembles influential conservative Black voices from various walks of life, aiming to establish a dialogue on issues of importance to the Black community. However, this idea might have been better received during the 2020 protests and Black Lives Matter campaign when so numerous young black people lost their lives to police violence. But, Black conservatives will say the deaths are painful but stop going further because of their belief in victimhood for Black Americans. It is impossible to be upset or outraged without implication of playing the victim card according to conservatives. Again, no voting rights or policing law has passed! But they are sorry.

Like a synchronized, but dysfunctional basketball team, the GOP’s “Starting Five” strives to establish a harmonious connection with Black voters. Their orchestrated efforts aim to collapse prior barriers, fostering trust and engagement through open and honest conversation. This party is still insisting that the 2020 election was fraudulent and manipulated. Nevertheless, they emphasize President Biden’s statement of “you’re not black” if you do not vote for him. In my community, we widely understood that the President suggested a strong historical connection between the Democratic party and the black community when it comes to voting, while the GOP has not made significant efforts to address urban issues.

However, the event that captures my utmost attention is the infamous Tim Scott debacle that occurred around 2017. During this incident, he positioned himself prominently alongside smiling white GOP congressional representatives, while trying to promote the merits of a regressive tax bill. Scott claimed that average Americans, particularly Black single parents, would experience a reduction in taxes, despite public information revealing that the law primarily benefited the wealthy. In a rather comical fashion, he even mockingly held up a piece of paper with the words “#keepyomoney” written on it. Keep in mind, Sen Scott remains the sole Black GOP congressional representative, and he reaches into his black-speak bag and that has what he pulls out at the glee of his contemporaries? No laugh track or AI needed. What’s unprofessional is his mis-educated use of ebonics to garner support for the horrible bill.

By creating a platform that amplifies the voices of Black leaders, Senator Scott’s “Starting Five” roundtable not only aims to listen but also to act on the concerns and aspirations of the Black community. This initiative goes beyond mere symbolism, delving into substantive policy discussions and action plans that address systemic inequalities and promote economic empowerment. Sen Tim Scott’s timing is both obvious election year pandering and auditioning. Since he is being considered for the Vice Presidency, it is attractive to GOP senior advisors and influential donors who operate behind the scenes if he can show a strong voting bloc, such as the Black vote.

The “Starting Five” round table is not just a one time eventstained effort to build lasting relationships and understanding with Black voters. Through this ongoing dialogue, the GOP hopes to show a genuine commitment to inclusivity and diversity, recognizing the diverse perspectives and experiences within the Black community. Senator Scott’s leadership in this initiative reflects a strategic approach to broaden the party’s appeal and create a more inclusive political landscape.

What do I think?

I argue that Senator Scott’s leadership in this initiative is merely a political tactic to gain support and appease certain demographics. His critics, like myself, claim that his supposed strategic approach is more about optics and less about genuine inclusivity. Skeptics, like me, argue true inclusivity would involve not just rhetoric, but also meaningful policy changes that address systemic inequalities and prioritize marginalized communities. Without concrete actions, I view Senator Scott’s efforts as nothing more than a surface-level attempt to gain political advantage rather than a sincere commitment to creating a more inclusive political landscape. He wants Black community votes doing none of the real work and visiting urban plighted areas instead opting for election “denialism”, non-committal on certifying election as a Vice President, and stating that America is not racist. I think he is disingenuous at best and at worst is a willing bad actor playing in tokenism politics.

Impact of Black Voter Suppression Tactics

Unfortunately, the fight for the Black vote is not without its dark side. Voter suppression tactics have emerged as a formidable adversary, using various mechanisms to impede access to the ballot box for Black voters. These tactics, ranging from burdensome identification requirements to gerrymandering, disproportionately affect communities of color, eroding the principle of equal representation. According to a Brennan Center investigation, a study “examined data for more than 6,600 jurisdictions that report purge rates to the Election Assistance Commission… [and] found that between 2014 and 2016, states removed almost 16 million voters from the rolls.”

Proponents and supporters will note that they put these tactics into action to ensure the integrity of the electoral system and prevent voter fraud. For example, election officials put burdensome identification requirements in place to verify the eligibility of voters and maintain the accuracy of election results. Despite the rarity of election fraud, people widely acknowledged the 2020 election as one of the most secure. Additionally, gerrymandering does not solely target communities of color, as it is a common practice used by both political parties to secure electoral advantages. While these tactics may have unintended consequences, such as affecting communities of color, they are not intentionally designed to erode equal representation according to ground level political architects. As my grandmother would say, “Wrong is wrong, and right is what you have to be.”

March Madness Leads to November Election Showdown

Just as a tight defense can block crucial shots, voter suppression tactics obstruct the path to participation for Black voters. Pardon my basketball analogy, but these underhanded moves threaten to undermine the very heart of democracy, fracturing the unity necessary for a level playing field.

Moreover, the United States has a long and troubling history of voter suppression tactics, with roots that trace back to the Reconstruction era following the Civil War. Poll taxes, literacy tests, and violent intimidation during this period actively prevented Black Americans from exercising their right to vote, systematically disenfranchising them. This legacy of discrimination continues to manifest in modern-day voter suppression efforts, perpetuating inequalities and silencing marginalized voices. Comically, GOP emphatically states that slowing of the US mail, creating extra voting guidelines, and underfunding state election offices are business as usual and not a tactic merely coincidence, like police bullets finding Black people more often.

Furthermore, the impact of voter suppression extends beyond individual disenfranchisement to have broader societal implications. When certain groups systematically prevent others from participating in the democratic process, it weakens the legitimacy of elected officials and policies because of the resulting lack of diverse representation. This erosion of trust in the political system can lead to disillusionment among Black voters and contribute to a cycle of disenfranchisement and apathy.

Role of Black Women in Shaping the Election Outcome

One cannot discuss the Black vote without acknowledging the unparalleled impact of Black women. Often described as the backbone of the Black community, Black women have consistently been at the forefront of efforts to rally voters and effect meaningful change. Their tireless activism and steadfast determination have not only influenced election outcomes but also engendered a profound transformation in the nation’s political fabric.

Black women, like star players, possess extraordinary leadership skills and an uncanny ability to inspire those around them. Their steadfast resolve to overcome obstacles has propelled them into positions of influence and rendered them indispensable in the quest for a fairer and more just society.

We cannot overstate the impact of Black women on the election outcome. Their organizing efforts have helped to mobilize communities, registering voters, and increasing voter turnout. Through grassroots initiatives and community engagement, Black women have created powerful networks that have shaped the political landscape. Dawn Staley, a Black female coach and her South Carolina University team deserve congratulations for their win against Iowa, which secured their third national championship and capped off a perfect season without a single loss. Coach Staley epitomizes the highest caliber of leadership, dedication, and commitment to excellence.

Moreover, Black women have been at the forefront of advocating for policies that address the unique challenges faced by marginalized communities. From healthcare to criminal justice reform, Black women have been tireless advocates for change, pushing for policies that promote equity and social justice.

Of course, I would be remiss to not show that not all Black women share the same views on policy solutions. While some Black women may advocate for policies that address the unique challenges faced by marginalized communities, others on the GOP right and black conservatism may have different perspectives and priorities. It is crucial to recognize the diversity of opinions within any group, including Black women, and engage in thoughtful conversation to understand and address the various needs and concerns of different individuals within this community.

The Time to Protect and Amplify the Black Vote is Now

The fight for the Black vote in the 2024 US elections is ongoing, with each side employing complex strategies to outwit the other. Understanding the nuances of this fight is essential to appreciating the significance of the Black vote and the challenges it faces. By recognizing the metaphorical chess game being played with Critical Race Theory, the power of Black voters as the game-changers, the GOP’s “Starting Five” roundtable, the detrimental impact of voter suppression tactics, and the pivotal role played by Black women, we can grasp the intricate dynamics shaping this critical chapter in American history.

It is incumbent upon every one of us to safeguard and amplify the Black vote, ensuring that our democracy remains strong, inclusive, and reflective of the diverse voices that enrich our nation. Above all, cast your vote in favor of the issues that hold significance for you, your family, and your community, rather than aligning with the political agendas of elected officials who serve your interests. I consistently hold in my memory the concept of a government that is for the people and by the people. In addition, the importance of elected positions at the city, county, and state levels cannot be overstated, potentially surpassing that of the presidential election.

As we move forward, it is crucial to uplift and support the leadership of Black women in shaping the election outcome. By recognizing their invaluable contributions, we can create a more inclusive and representative democracy. Acknowledging their impact is not enough. The appointment of Kamala Harris, a black woman, as Vice President should not foster complacency or create the illusion that racism has been eradicated.

To summarize, Black women's contribution to shaping the election outcome was of the utmost importance and should not be underestimated. Their tireless efforts, leadership, and determination has paved the way for a more fair and just society. As we navigate the complexities of the political e our voices, protect the Black vote, and work towards a future where every voice and every vote

The fight for the Black vote is a fight for the soul of our democracy, which requires the collective effort of all who believe in justice and equality.

Join BreakingRanks in this crucial battle by subscribing to our blog. Stay informed on the latest developments in voter suppression, election misinformation, and the broader struggle for social justice. Your voice is powerful; together, we can create a tide of change that uplifts every community member.

Subscribe now and be part of a movement dedicated to making a difference.

--

--

Wayne Ince
The Polis

I write about social justice, mental health , politics, and marginalized communities. PHI THETA KAPPA. Published author in National Magazine Veterans Voices