Sitemap
The Political Prism

Celebrating diverse political perspectives and viewpoints.

Today’s Economic Elites and the Coming Reckoning

5 min readJun 11, 2025

--

An image of an angry mob headed to the barricades with an American flag.
The Reckoning (AI-generated image)

You can feel it in the air — at demonstrations, on social media, in food banks, in the hollowed-out hearts of once-thriving towns. Over a century ago, America’s Gilded Age economic elites mistook their opulence for immunity, believing their fortunes would insulate them. They were wrong.

Today’s tech moguls, hedge fund titans, and political puppeteers are making the same mistake, sailing deeper into their echo chambers while the electorate simmers below. History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does tend to rhyme — and the anger in middle America is starting to sound a lot like an alarm bell.

We’ve seen this movie before

A few rise high, the rest fall behind, and eventually, the people who foot the bill get tired of paying the tab. From the 19th-century railroad barons to today’s tech billionaires sailing $500 million yachts, the cycles are unmistakable: wealth accumulates, institutions bend toward privilege, and eventually — sometimes slowly, sometimes all at once — the public revolts. The details change. The arc does not.

This isn’t just a story of economic disparity. It’s a story of civic decay. It’s the predictable fallout when unchecked power cloaks itself in innovation, when elite self-regard masquerades as merit, and when wealth stops being a reward for contribution and becomes an emblem of greed.

We’ve seen it before — in America’s own Gilded Age and the Progressive movement that followed it. We’ve seen it more violently in the French Revolution, where the ancien régime fell not to reform but to the blade. And we’re watching its 21st-century remix unfold now: one part Silicon Valley, one part Wall Street, and one part Palm Beach demagogue who promised to fight the system while quietly reinforcing it.

The reckoning is not here yet. But it’s coming. History insists on it.

From barons to Bezos: A tale of two Gilded Ages

The first Gilded Age was called gilded for a reason. It shimmered with opulence on the outside, but it was all rot beneath. America’s great industrialists — Carnegie, Rockefeller, Vanderbilt — built vast fortunes in railroads, steel, oil, and finance. They created the modern economy, but they also abused it. Labor was cheap and unprotected. Monopolies crushed competition. The political system was awash in corruption and patronage.

And the people noticed. It took time, and it took organization, but the backlash finally arrived: trust-busting legislation, labor protections, women’s suffrage, direct election of senators. The Progressive Era didn’t emerge from thin air. It emerged out of necessity. It was the price of ignoring, for too long, the suffering of the many in favor of the indulgences of the few.

We’ve replaced railroads with electric cars and steel mills with online shopping, but the engines of inequality are still running the same old track. Instead of gilded mansions on Fifth Avenue, we have superyachts docked off Mallorca. Instead of monopoly oil, we have monopoly data. The language has changed — “disruption,” “innovation,” “platforms” — but the pattern hasn’t. Wealth is once again concentrating at the top at a scale unseen in a century, and middle America is once again being hollowed out in service to it.

Trumpism: The fake revolution of the ultra-rich

Donald Trump didn’t create the problem. He simply recognized the festering discontent and repackaged it in gold leaf. He channeled the anger of the economically excluded and redirected it toward immigrants, liberal elites, and the institutions of modern government— anything but the billionaires funding his campaigns. He raged against “globalists” from a penthouse built on foreign debt. He promised to drain the swamp while installing moguls, lobbyists, ideologues, and unqualified loyalists into every corner of government.

The irony, of course, is that Trumpism could have been the start of the reckoning. The anger was real. The betrayal was real. But Trump’s solution was the bait and switch he used as a real estate promoter. Instead of dismantling the system that allowed the rich to siphon power and wealth, he is expanding it. He is slashing taxes for the ultrarich, gutting regulatory agencies, turning the Justice Department into a shield for executive autocracy — and Homeland Security’s ICE into his personal tool for intimidation.

Trump is not an outsider. He is the ultimate insider — born into wealth, protected by lawyers, made palatable by the compromised media he derides while leveraging it daily. His movement mimics populism but serves his class instead.

And he’s still at it.

The reckoning delayed — but not denied

What makes this moment different from the French Revolution is not the pain but the process. The French peasants had no real tools of political power. No vote. No representation. No recourse but revolt. The American middle and working classes, for now, still possess the machinery of democracy. But that machinery has been gummed up — by gerrymandering, media fragmentation, voter suppression, and a campaign finance system that puts billionaires on speed dial and ordinary citizens on hold.

Still, there’s only so far you can stretch a rubber band before it snaps. The signs are already here. A third of Americans say neither major party represents them. Union drives are rising at companies long considered immune. Younger generations reject capitalism in growing numbers not because they hate prosperity, but because they see how rigged the game has become.

And it is rigged — by carried interest loopholes, offshore tax shelters, and monopolistic practices that make upward mobility the stuff of myth. The American Dream isn’t dying because people are lazy. It’s dying because it was auctioned off — bit by bit, vote by vote, backroom by backroom — by those who benefited most from its mythology.

Reform or rupture: The choices ahead

What comes next depends on whether those in power can read the room — or more accurately, the history books. The Progressive Era didn’t end capitalism. It saved it. It injected a dose of fairness, transparency, and civic morality into a system that had gone septic. It made markets serve society rather than devour it.

We need another correction. Not to punish success, but to redefine it. Not to tear down the ladder, but to make sure it doesn’t get pulled up after the climb. That means tax policy that reflects reality, not ideology. It means regulatory frameworks that enforce competition, not favor incumbents. It means a reinvestment in public goods — education, infrastructure, healthcare — not as charity, but as shared infrastructure for a functioning society.

The wealthy can be part of that. Some, like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett already are. But it will take more than philanthropy to rebalance the system. It will take accountability. It will take laws. And it will take the political will to act before the pressure becomes irreversible.

The clock is ticking

The French Revolution ended with blood in the streets. The American Progressive Era ended with votes in the ballot box. The path we choose now depends on whether we learn from either.

We are not immune to history. The signs are all around us — in angry demonstrations, hatred of “others”, in the hollowed-out towns and unlivable cities that dot the American map. The next reckoning doesn’t have to be violent. But it does have to be real.

Because what lies on the other side of inaction is not peace. It’s collapse. And no yacht — no matter how big — can sail far enough to escape that.

--

--

The Political Prism
The Political Prism

Published in The Political Prism

Celebrating diverse political perspectives and viewpoints.

Dick Dowdell
Dick Dowdell

Written by Dick Dowdell

A former US Army officer with a wonderful wife and family, I’m a software architect and engineer, currently CTO and Chief Architect of a software startup.