Why Are There No Openly Gay Men in Professional Tennis?

The answer isn’t that straightforward

Charlie van Houten
PRESS BOX
5 min readApr 27, 2022

--

Image by efes at Pixabay

The beauty of organized sports is that they teach us so many lessons about life. All the values and virtues we learn on the court or the field — patience, persistence, self-belief, and even grace in defeat — can all be carried over and applied to everyday life. And just as sports can be a microcosm of real life, the history of sports in this country mirrors society’s changing norms when it comes to things like inclusion, equality, and acceptance.

Sports both reflect and advance societal change

There was a time when racial segregation was the law of the land, and baseball’s segregated leagues were just accepted as the way things were. When the slow but steady dismantling of legal segregation began after World War II, Major League baseball followed suit and began integrating the sport.

In the 1970s, the burgeoning women’s rights movement helped to expand Title IX — a civil rights law that deals with federally funded educational programs — to include equal funding for women’s athletics. The same spirit of equality that advanced Title IX undoubtedly inspired Billie Jean King and her fellow players to form the Women’s Tennis Association (WTA) with the goal of equal pay (and respect) for female professional tennis players.

To be clear, the history of tennis in the U.S. is probably one of the most notorious when it comes to exclusion and inequality. For much of its history, tennis was an elitist sport played by rich white people at restricted country clubs, and female professionals earned only a fraction of what men were making.

But tennis has come a long way. Legends like Arthur Ashe and the Williams sisters started important conversations about racism and access to tennis and inspired future generations of non-white players to get involved in the sport. Thanks to the efforts of Billie Jean King and many others in the WTA, female professionals now receive equal pay and equal billing with their male counterparts.

Professional tennis’ relationship to the LGBTQ community

There is one aspect of professional tennis, however, that seems to be behind the curve relative to societal changes and even to other sports: the complete absence of out, gay male players. In a time of sweeping social change that includes marriage equality in the U.S and 30 other countries, ever-improving societal attitudes towards LGBTQ people, and more and more public figures (including athletes) being open about their sexuality, it’s puzzling to me why there has never been a single active player on the men’s Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) tour to open up about being gay.

On the surface, professional tennis today appears to have a progressive, inclusive attitude towards gays. Margaret Court, a legend of the game who went on to become a Christian Pentecostal minister and outspoken anti-LGBTQ figure, has been almost universally dismissed as a bigot whose views do not represent the values of tennis or modern society.

When former ATP player Sergiy Stakhovsky denied the possibility that there could be any gay men in the ATP top 100 (along with some other offensive comments about lesbians in tennis), former player and Athlete Ally ambassador James Blake responded by saying “Stakhovsky is kidding himself if he believes there are no gay tennis players in the (men’s) top 100. I hope that if any players inside or outside the top 100 decide to come out, they will be welcomed and supported.”

But looking beyond the official statements and well-meaning gestures of support, the puzzle of why gay men in tennis can’t or won’t come out is a lot more complex than it may seem.

Geography and culture

Part of the issue with homosexuality in men’s tennis may stem from the fact that it’s an international sport. While the U.S., Canada, and countries in Western Europe may be socially liberal and offer legal protections and rights to LGBTQ people, the majority of players come from parts of the world where being gay is, at best, frowned upon and, at worst, treated as a crime. So, players’ decisions to remain quiet about their sexuality may have less to do with the culture of tennis itself, and a whole lot to do with the culture they grew up in.

So, if we accept that tennis players from all over the world are influenced by the values of their home countries, how do we explain the discrepancy between the men’s and women’s tours in terms of out players? While the ATP currently has zero openly gay players, the WTA has had many out players like Billie-Jean King, Martina Navratilova, and Amelie Mauresmo. Currently, the women’s tour has a number of out lesbian players like Tara Moore, Alison Van Uytvanck, and Greet Minnen who have publicly acknowledged their identities and romantic relationships with no significant backlash or impact on their careers.

While King and Navratilova may not have come out on their own terms back in the 1970s, they ended up serving as role models for future female players. Unfortunately, those types of roles models simply don’t exist in the men’s game.

Team vs individual sports

When I think about different men’s sports and how their individual cultures might influence gay players’ decisions to be open about their sexuality, team sports would seem to fall to the bottom of the list. Locker-room culture can at times be toxically macho, with straight men trying to affirm their masculinity with sexually degrading talk about women and off-color jokes about gays, all in an effort to bond with, and get approval from, their teammates.

Surprisingly, though, the handful of American professional athletes who have come out (or were already out before being recruited) all played team sports: Carl Nassib and Michael Sam (NFL), Jason Collins (NBA), and Robbie Rogers (professional soccer.)

Interestingly, the team vs individual dynamic in professional sports can cut both ways, as I learned from sportswriter Kevin Majoros: “I have had several gay athletes from team sports tell me that, because they had the support of their teammates, nothing changed in the locker room [after coming out]. I don’t think that exists in individual sports like tennis where the locker room culture is a mix of competitors. Wolf pack mentality kicks in and the one perceived as the weakest is the target. It’s going to take a really tough tennis player to be the one to step forward first.”

The fear of a hamstrung career

Still another issue is players’ concerns about what effect being out might have on their careers. Even though opportunities in professional tennis are objectively merit-based (when and where you get to play is based on your results and ranking, not the subjective decisions of a coach or a team owner), players might worry about corporate sponsors pulling away, or even losing support from their fans. For some players who want to be open about their sexuality, agents and other handlers may discourage them, warning that it could hurt their careers in unexpected ways.

Even if a player’s worst fears about coming out are irrational, those feelings of fear can still be paralyzing. As we’ve seen recently, huge societal shifts can be put in motion when one person with the courage to speak up inspires others to break their silence. In men’s professional tennis, that one individual has yet to come forward but, when he does, I hope it will kickstart a new environment where all players can feel comfortable living their truth, free from judgment and fear.

--

--

Charlie van Houten
PRESS BOX

Tennis lover and cat Dad, sharing my thoughts with the world.