A Word From The LORD: A Word From GOD: By His Ward: Masculinism 101 Results, For The Examination Taken By The Ode L’Oke

“There is an evil which I have seen under the sun, as it were an error proceeding from the ruler: folly is set in many high places, and the rich sit in a low place. I have seen slaves on horses, and princes walking on foot like slaves.”

• Solomon, The Preacher.

Thus,

when men strive to survive

with the weakness of Woman,

and women strive to survive

with the strength of men;

you demonise the one

as “fear ri guts,”

and glorify the other

as doing it better than men.

I did not ask thee a question.

Now, I ask thee the question.

Did I hear you say double standards?

or two-timing?

or just being politically correct.

Even as I keep on repeating

every morning, afternoon, evening, night;

had the one truly the power of men,

could you ever spit on him

or spit him out

as you never do the Woman

whose weakness you allow to flower

into the power you place him under

when he deigns not to bear the insults

and thus believe himself better than others?

Thus you see a man with cosmetics like unto lip-stick and eye shadow, and you say “Eeew!!”

And you see a woman with the muscles of Arnold Schwarzenegger, and you admire — even though the “Eeew!!” still registers instinctively in your mind.

True? Or false.

Double standards? Two-timing? Or just being politically correct.

And has thou ever thought of how often lesbians say, “What a man can do, I can do even better;” as often as homosexuals say, “I am weak, and even then a man?”

That thou may then glorify the one, for being a female dousing passion like a male; and with the same breath demonise the other, for being a male dousing passion like a female.

Not knowing (like The Fool that is thy Christianity does not) that the sole difference between his words and those of Paul is that Paul renounced sexuality in all its entirety.

Even as it is written,

“When I am weak, then I am strong.”

Double standards? Two-timing? Or still just being politically correct.

Obviously too politically correct (or too much of a FOOL) to hear HEAR that which Paul says — when he saith unto the man that is weak, and even then a man;

“I permit no woman to teach, or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent.”

And even more obviously too Hell and Heaven bent on FOLLY to realise that which Solomon saith — when he saith unto the man that has not the authority to have her be silent,

“……which my mind has sought repeatedly, but I have not found. One man among a thousand I found, but a woman among all these I have not found.”

I think of History without concoctions like unto those of Wikipedia (History that has never had lesbians be known sick, sinner, or criminal) and I say it definitely is not merely being politically correct.

There’s something most suicidal about the nobility of Masculinity that can never allow a man to die for a man; however much of a Rambo or a Christ he may be.

Thus, I say of the man that says, “I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing” because of official cars, official mansions, and how-many-figured? sala sees;

The power you placed him under

was even there placed by thee.

And therefore, due both to thy Folly and thy Error — that places men under She declared by The Wisdom of Solomon as incapable of Wisdom; slaves have said,

“We will become Gods, and a prince will be praying to us;”

and women have said also, not only,

“We are the new man;”

but even too,

“We have become Gods.”

The conclusion of the matter, after all has been said and done; because sentence against the evil was not executed speedily, thou may choose between two options:

1) having me be avenged — even as it is written, “speedily.”

2) asking GOD for The Omega; that The LORD may create then new Heavens, and a new earth.

Assignment:

An emasculated man must never marry, but rather parry.

Is this an assumption, an observation, a derivation, or a fact?

- Ikoro Iyineleda, Being Baara of a generation called Bastard (20th of August, 2019).