A Former Tech Worker Questions the Environmental Costs of AI

Are we really willing to sacrifice the planet for this technology?

Samantha Carson
The Quantastic Journal

--

NOTE: This post represents my personal views about AI in my capacity as a private individual. It does not represent the views of any of my previous or current employers or promote their products or services.

Scarlet macaw standing on a branch and looking at the camera with pink and purple flowers in the background.
Scarlet macaw. Image by German Rojas on Pixabay.

The announcement came as a surprise to me, though maybe it shouldn’t have.

The company I used to work for was pivoting away from its initial flagship product. We would still have and support the product, of course, it was (and is) used by millions of people every day. But it wouldn’t be our main focus anymore.

Instead, we were now going to focus on an “integrated, AI-powered” product.

There it was. AI.

Yet another tech buzzword. A fad like crypto, bitcoin, VR, and any number of other so-called innovations that dominated headlines for a day and have now been relegated to the growing graveyard of failed tech experiments.

Unfortunately, the costs of this fad are myriad and damaging to nearly everyone, especially those who can least afford them.

The Environmental Costs

--

--

Samantha Carson
The Quantastic Journal

Environment. Tech. Systems. Consumer advocacy. Life to work balance. Anti-productivity culture. Impact the world by caring for your own little part of it.