The Radical Center
Published in

The Radical Center

What We Know About Christmas That Just Ain’t So

There are a lot of people who drone on about “the true meaning of Christmas,” which usually means something to do with their religious beliefs. The “true” meaning of Christmas just happens to be whatever it is they want everyone else to believe. Yet Christmas is the one holiday with more false assumptions about it than any other holiday. The reality is what most people know about Christmas just ain’t so.

For example, most Christians have no idea the Nativity story they repeat, year after year, is a collection of several Nativity stories pieced together from the gospels. Nor do they realize these stories contradict one another. A careful editing, in most church services, however, weeds out the conflicts and makes the story appear to be a coherent whole, albeit an unlikely one.

The Christmas story is based on the individual stories of the four main gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. These books were not necessarily written by the authors to whom they are ascribed. In truth we don’t know who wrote them. But, we do know that the four stories don’t agree with one another as to the facts. The Christmas story, as presented in most church pageants, is actually created by cherry-picking sections from the different gospels and combining them.

For example, we are told Herod was informed a “king” would be born so he had all the newborn babies slaughtered, but Jesus escaped. The odd thing is not one contemporary record of this genocide exists to substantiate it. Josephus wrote about Herod in his Antiquities of the Jews, but he never knew about this incident. Three of the gospel writers seemed to either not know of the mass killing or thought it was unimportant. Only Matthew recounts it, Mark, Luke and John seemed to be unaware that it took place.

Based on historical accounts Herod would have been already dead by the time Jesus was born, yet two gospels say he was king. Luke says Caesar Augustus issued an order for a census and it “came to pass” when Quirinius was the governor of Syria. Quirinius, or Cyrenius as he is also known, only became governor 10 years after the death of Herod. The history by Josephus showed Herod had died and was replaced by Archelaus, who was considered too oppressive by Caesar and removed from office and replaced by Cyrenius. The gospels contradict one another on this matter.

Luke said the Romans required the people to return to their hometown for the census. But Rome never did this. Considering the large territory ruled by Rome such a requirement would have been noted somewhere. Only Luke seems to believe this was the case. Rome exerted control over Judea but through a client king. So while the gospel account says Rome held the census to impose a tax, Rome itself didn’t impose taxes. It collected revenue from the local king who had control over taxation, not Rome. A Roman census and/or tax would not have included Judea.

In addition Rome would not have required women to be counted. The man was the legal head of the household and he would report the numbers for the census without the woman or children being required to do so. Even if the Romans required individuals to travel to their hometown, something impossible in an empire the size of Rome, a woman would not have done this, especially one on the verge of giving birth. Riding a donkey for that length of time while pregnant, would probably have resulted in a miscarriage.

Luke says Jesus was born in Bethlehem, was born in the manger and was visited by the Wise Men in the manger. But Matthew says the Wise Men came to see Jesus in a house, not in a manger. Matthew wrote Mary and Joseph lived in Bethlehem and moved to Nazareth. Luke says they lived in Nazareth and moved to Bethlehem. Perhaps they passed themselves on the way.

Early Christians didn’t think Jesus was born in a stable or in a house. They preferred the story he was born in a cave. Origen wrote, “there is shown at Bethlehem the cave where He was born and the manger in the cave where He was wrapped in swaddling-clothes.” The Church of the Nativity is, in fact, built over a cave alleged to be the spot of the birth of Jesus.

Matthew wrote that after the birth, Joseph “took the young child and his mother by night, and departed into Egypt.” Luke, however, knew nothing about that and instead says “they returned into Galilee, to their own city Nazareth.”

To complicate matters even more it appears Bethlehem didn’t exist during the time period Jesus was alleged to have been born. Well, actually there were two Bethlehems. Matthew and Luke say it was Bethlehem of Judea where Jesus was born, not the Bethlehem in Galilee. But archeological evidence indicates the Judean Bethlehem didn’t exist at the time. Bethlehem of Galilee, however, wasn’t far from Nazareth at all and it did exist. Matthew and Luke seem to have been wrong on this matter.

Mark apparently knew nothing about the virgin birth. And the oldest sections of the New Testament, those books ascribed to Paul, are also devoid of any mention of the concept. Luke talked about shepherds but Matthew seemed to not know they were around at the time.

Even the date of Christmas has problems. Early Christians simply did not believe that Jesus was born on December 25th. The birth dates they ascribed varied greatly, ranging from January to May. December 25th was the date the winter solstice was celebrated — when the days got longer. True the actual solstice is on the 21st but the crude instruments of the day only detected the longest day on the 25th and it was the traditional date for celebration.

Many of the pagan sects claimed a god-man was born on Dec. 25th. The god-man Attis was supposedly born of a virgin on Dec. 25th. In Greece the god Dionysus was said to have been born on the 25th as well. The Egyptians celebrated the birth of Osiris on that date as was the Persian god Mithra. The Babylonians did the same. These dates were picked for the birth of gods simply because it was the date when they noticed the days getting longer. The Roman Saturnalia was traditionally celebrated from Dec 17 to 23 but Emperor Aurelian decided the 25th would be the day to celebrate everything.

The Catholic Church ultimately picked December 25th, to celebrate the birth of Jesus because it was a date with widespread cultural acceptance, not because it was accurate. People already celebrate the birth of a god-man on that day making it an easier sell for the church.

As I said: most of what you know about Christmas just ain’t so.

If you wish to support these columns donate on our page at Patreon.

--

--

--

A blog for the Moorfield Storey Institute: a liberaltarian think tank.

Recommended from Medium

Peter Was Not the Sharpest Gaff in the Boat

THE FIRST DAY OF SPRING

April 2021 Energy Update — Astrology & Numerology

The Essence of the Holy Scriptures

A silhouette of a boy reading a Bible.

The “Discerning of Spirits Gift” From “The Holy Spirit” Is Like Having A Superpower To Fight Evil &…

I Lost My Atheism and Found …

Enjoying Any Circumstance In Life Through Gratitude

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
James Peron

James Peron

James Peron is the president of the Moorfield Storey Institute, was the founding editor of Esteem a LGBT publication in South Africa under apartheid.

More from Medium

The Day I Ran Out of Church

Christian Cranal to Anal Loopback Syndrome

Christian Cranal to Anal Loopback Syndrome Photo

Who Deserves A Personal Pronoun?

The Pulse of America in brief — Media | Politicians | God — BCWorldview