# Fear and Loathing with APL

Having heard so much about APL from *Phil Trelford* (who is one of the leaders in the F# community) I decided to try it out too. For the uninitiated, APL code looks every bit as mind-bending and unbelievable as scenes from Johnny Depp’s *Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas*.

For example, the **life** function below implements Conway’s game of life:

I know, right? WTF and mind blowing in equal measures…

As I was learning through Mastering Dyalog APL, I took down plenty of notes which I hope will help get you up to speed with the basics quickly.

You can try out the examples at TryAPL, just click on the “APL Keyboard” button and use the virtual keyboard to enter the symbols you need.

### Learn APL in 10 Minutes

and

does what you’d expect but multiplication and division becomes

and

(just like in maths).

in APL is power, i.e.

/ in APL also means something else, which we’ll come to later.

Also note the difference between negative sign

and subtraction

, e.g.

Use

to assign a value (either scalar or array) to a name, e.g.

and remember, variable names are **case sensitive**.

Variables are **mutable**, and you can assign multiple variable at once:

but only if the length match, otherwise you’ll get an error

=>

You can perform arithmetic operations between two arrays with the same shape:

=>

=>

look ma, no loops!

If the shape doesn’t match, then you get an error:

=>

But, if one of the variables is a scalar then the other variable can be any shape:

=>

=>

The same rule applies to other operations, e.g. max

and min

.

=>

=>

=>

Most symbols in APL have double meaning, just like they do in algebra, e.g.

where — means subtraction, a **dyadic** use of the symbol

where — means negative, a **monadic** use of the same symbol

(before you freak out, *monadic* here is of the Mathematics definition, and not the Haskell variant)

To find the length of an array, you can use Rho

monadically:

=> 5

You can also Rho dyadically to organize items into specified shapes, i.e.

=>

where 4 2 describes the shape — 4 rows, 2 columns, followed by Rho and the array of items to be organized.

If the number of items in the array doesn’t match the number of slots in the shape we’re trying to organize into, then the array is repeated, e.g.

=>

=>

If there are too many items then extra items are ignored:

=>

Utilizing the way items are repeated, there’s a neat trick you can do, e.g.

=>

In general, APL has special names for data depending on its shape:

**scalar** — single value

**vector** — list of values

**matrix** — array with 2 dimensions

**array** — generic term for any set of values, regardless of no. of dimensions

**table** — common term for matrix

**cube** — common term for array with 3 dimensions

Ok, now that we’ve introduced the notion of dimensions, it’s time to confess that I slightly misled you earlier — Rho

actually returns the **shape** of an array (not just its length, which only applies to a vector), so it works with multi-dimensional data too.

=> 2 2

Furthermore, since the result of Rho is itself a vector, applying Rho again will give us the number of dimensions an array has — otherwise known as its **Rank**.

=> 2

i.e. scalars have 0 rank, vectors have 1 rank, and so on…

You can also reduce over a set of values using / e.g. a plus reduction to sum up all the numbers in an array can be written as

=>

similarly, factorial can be written using multiply reduction:

=>

The / symbol is an operator, whereas

etc. are functions. / can accept any of these functions and uses it to reduce over an array.

=> 9

=> 1

APL calls programs **defined functions**, and you can create a defined function like this:

=> 3

where:

– program name

– generic symbol for array passed on the right

– generic symbol for array passed on the left

for example, if we have a function

such that

=> 16

what we’ve done here is to sum the array on the right of

(4 5 6 7), and subtract it with the sum of the array on the left (1 2 3).

Simple, right? Let’s try a few more.

=> 63

and you can use your custom functions with reduction:

=> 15

To index into an array, you can use the standard [ ] notation:

=> 4

noticed that? APL is **one-indexed**!

What’s more, just like everything else, you can index into array with either a scalar or an array:

=> 1 3 4

=> 1 3 4 1

This also works when it comes to updating values in an array:

=> 42 2 42 4 42

=> 1 2 3 4 5

=>

Note that it follows the same rule as functions with regards to the input being either a scalar or a same-shaped array.

If the shape of the array doesn’t match, then it’ll error:

=>

Equally, if you use an invalid index, you’ll also get an error:

=>

You can use Iota

to generate an array of integers from 1 to N, e.g.

=> 1 2 3 4

=> 1 2 3 4

Booleans are represented as 1 and 0, and you can use any one of these relational functions: < = =/ >

=> 0 1 1

=> 1 0 0

AND and OR semantics are represented by

and

respectively.

=> 1 0 1

=> 0 1 1

you can use them to count no. of employees based on salary for instance:

=> 2

You can also use an array of boolean values as masks too:

=> 1 3

=> iu

this is called **compression**, and is useful for selecting items conforming to some criteria, e.g.

=> 1 1 0 0 0 1 0

=> 7

=> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

therefore, to find the indices of values that’s greater than 10

=> 1 2 6

and to get the corresponding values, just use compression:

=> 11 13 15

Given two arrays, A and B, you can return a new array with all the elements of A minus all the elements of B using the **without** operator ~

=> 1 2

this **doesn’t modify** A or B though.

=> 1 2 3

=> 3 4 5

**memberships**

To find items from an array that exists in another array, you can use the membership operator

=> 1 0 1 0 1

it also works with strings

=> 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0

you can (like before) get the indices of matches using compression:

=> 2 4 6 8 11 14 16 20 23 24 30 33 36 41 43 45

or find the matching characters using compression:

=> aaaiaaaeeeaiaaii

inspecting the result tells us that those are indeed the characters we’re looking for!

**search**

We saw how we can combine memberships and iota-rho

to find the indices in Phrase that corresponds to a member in ‘aeiouy’.

What if we want to find the first index each character in ‘aeiouy’ appears in Phrase, i.e. *“aeiouy”.Select(char -> Phrase.IndexOf(char))* if you’re coming from a .Net background.

We can use the dyadic form of Iota

for example,

=> 2 20 8 47 47 47

note that the length of Phrase is 46

=> 46

so the result 47 is essentially saying that ‘o’, ‘u’, ‘y’ never appeared in Phrase.

You can model an ‘else’ semantic using two arrays whose lengths are off by 1. For instance:

based on the way search works (not found = length + 1), we can map the specified Area codes to corresponding discount rates: 17 -> 9, 50 -> 8, … 89 -> 4, and all others to 2.

=> 6 6 5 6 6 2 6 2 4 6 1 5

so where D does not exist in Area, you’ll get index 6 which does not exist in Area, BUT exists in Discount — i.e. the ‘other’ case we’re trying to model.

So if we use the result of

as indices in Discount we’ll find the corresponding discount rate for the values in D:

=> 2 2 4 2 2 8 2 8 5 2 9 4

this is an algorithm for **changing the frame of reference**, i.e. changing a list of area codes into a list of discount values, a general form can be described as:

where

=

+ 1

**take and drop**

You can use the Take

and Drop

functions like you do with Enumerable.Take and Enumerable.Drop in LINQ:

=> 1 2 3 4

=> 5 6 7 8 9 10

if the count is negative then you take from the end of the list, e.g. take last 3 items or drop last 7 items:

=> 8 9 10

=> 1 2 3

Given a list of values

suppose you want to find the change from one number to the next, i.e. 3 *(+5)* 8 *(-3)* 5*(+9)* 14…

considering that

=> 8 5 14 34 5 17 21 18

=> 3 8 5 14 34 5 17 21

so now you can subtract the two arrays (of equal length) to get the answer:

=>

clever, right? It’s reminiscent of the RX approach to tracking mouse moves.

**mirrors and transposition**

You can also pivot data about any direction easily:

(screenshot taken from Mastering Dyalog APL)

**outer products**

You can use the outer product operator

to calculate the cartesian products of two lists:

=>

using the small circle + dot

+ an operation to apply, in this case multiply

, but could easily be anything else:

=>

here’s even more examples taken from Mastering Dyalog APL:

Unlike some of the operations we’ve seen so far, the outer product operator works across different sized arrays too:

=>

Finally, there are some common patterns (or idioms) you’ll see in APL.

- find indices in A that exists in B

- find the members (not indices) of A that exists in B

- find indices in A where B first appeared in (i.e.
*IndexOf*)

- change the frame of reference

- generate indices with incrementing steps

So that’s it, I hope this post has given you a flavour of APL and help you learn the basics quickly. I find the array programming paradigm absolutely mind blowing and a completely different way to think about problems.

Also I find it has a similar transformative effect in changing the way I think about variables — as a point-in-time snapshot of some scalar value — to FRP (e.g. signals in Elm or observables in RX).

In the next post, let’s see how we can use APL to solve some simple problems (that’s all I’m able to manage for now!).