Mike Meyer
TheOtherLeft
Published in
1 min readMay 27, 2017

--

You may have a point but I’m not sure. I tend to take people, initially at least, at face value so I’m assuming you have something to,say. Unfortunately I can’t tell from your other writing.

The foundation of what I, at least, an talking about is evolution. Also anyone familiar with evolutionary biology and ethics understands that social and cultural characteristics directly affect evolutionary change. It was once taught that evolution was strictly fixed on genetic inheritance and that it stopped for homo sapiens in the Neolithic. Nope. It just became very much more complex. We are now increasingly, directly working to take control of it. Managing language to adjust social patterns that are destructive is the most ethical process by which to do that. At least for me and those that are attempting to actually understand this, it is obvious that we may be in a epic burst of change. And we are struggling to understand where this is going because we are going there whether we like it or not. The point being that this type of change is either successful or an evolutionary dead end. We certainly don’t want the result to dead.

--

--

Mike Meyer
TheOtherLeft

Writer, Educator, Campus CIO (retired) . Essays on our changing reality here, news and more at https://rlandok.substack.com/