Isabella ArmourApr 63 min read
Down and Dirty


Frederic Clements
- this man was born in Nebraska
- (exciting, I know)
- and grew up to become a botanist and an ecologist, obtaining his degrees from the University of Nebraska
- where he met his future wife, also a botanist-ecologist
- they were married in 1899
- Clements obtained his PhD in 1898
- and became a professor at the University of Nebraska in 1905
- he left not more than two years later to take a job as the head of the botany department at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis
- he stayed in Minnesota for ten years and spent the rest of his career (1917–1941) at the Carnegie Institute of Washington in Washington D.C.
- why do we care about this man?
- he is one of the ecologists who built the foundation of how we think about succession in plant communities
- in the first quarter of the 20th century
- there was much debate among ecologists about the nature of a biological community
- Clements’ theory was that communities of organisms function as one super-organism
- all species of a community are closely bound
- as closely interdependent as cells, tissues, and organs


- but let’s back up for a moment
- communities of organisms, like plants go through a process called succession
- succession is the change in the composition of a community (in this case, a plant community) over time
- this is change over decades, not annual change
- successional change is cumulative and directional
- meaning that it compounds upon itself and progresses in a predictable manner
- for example
- for a very generalized and not nearly nuanced enough example
- there is a forest fire that kills all the plants in the forest community
- now the plant community must start anew
- usually the first set of plants to return are annual plants
- then, after a few years, perennials and grasses start to appear
- then shrubs
- then softwood trees
- then hardwood trees
- and then you have a forest again


- so how does this relate back to Clements?
- he hypothesized that succession will eventually reach a climax point
- a point at which there is no more change in the composition of the plant community
- the main drivers of succession are competition between plants and plant modification of the environment
- plants compete for resources to survive
- so those that do the best job of obtaining those resources are the ones that get to live
- and plants modify their environment
- by using resources, they deplete resources
- so as they modify their own environment, they are slowly making it less habitable for themselves and more habitable for other plant species
- so those other species come in and form the next stage of the succession process
- Clements is the man behind all of this magic
- and it all makes a lot of sense, doesn’t it?
- well
- many of his colleagues didn’t think so
But they didn’t totally discredit his theory. There are some things that Clementian succession can explain and some it cannot. His colleagues and ecologists in the generations that followed further disseminated how succession functions and came to something of a synthesis between Clements’ ideas and those of other scientists. Ecology is a young science and we are just beginning to organize the tenets of how ecosystems function. It’s messy and it’s exciting.
Time to get dirty.
Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 06 Apr. 2016. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederic_Clements?oldformat=true>.
“(i). Plant Succession.” 9(i) Plant Succession. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Apr. 2016. <http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/9i.html>.