The lessons of the Y2K panic, a worldwide digital apocalypse that never happened

A crisis averted or a secular doomsday prophecy?

Louis Anslow
Timeline
4 min readDec 29, 2016

--

Brokers at the Cairo stock exchange worked on computers in the lead up to the new millennium. December, 1999. (AP Photo/Amr Nabil)

January 1st, 2000 was supposed to see the modern world collapse like one long string of broken code. This was supposedly the Frankenstein story for the Information Age: a fateful reckoning with the technology we had ourselves created.

Panicked reports of the bug had begun as far back as 1996, and the year after that the British Standards Institute developed its “Year 2000 Conformity Requirements.” Governments around the world set up task forces to deal with the specter of Y2K collapse, and in 1998 Bill Clinton did a press conference on the issue.

President Bill Clinton discusses the computer glitch known as ‘Y2K’ during a speech at the National Academy of Science on July 14, 1998. (Richard Ellis/Getty Images)

On one end of the spectrum, people worried about missing work when their digital alarm clocks malfunctioned. On the other end they agonized over atomic power plants shutting down, planes crashing, and the triggering of an unintended nuclear war:

At the beginning of 1999 Time magazine ran a cover touting “The End of the World?” The very next day, Bill Clinton said in his state of the union address, “We need every State and local government, every business, large and small, to work with us to make sure that [the] Y2K computer bug will be remembered as the last headache of the 20th century, not the first crisis of the 21st.” This began a year of hand wringing and doomsaying.

One of the few people who warned of the dangers of this hysteria was John Koskinen, chairman of Bill Clinton’s commission on the year 2000 conversion. He said “As it becomes clear our national infrastructure will hold, overreaction becomes one of the biggest remaining problems.” He was ignored. Bill Gates brushed off the panic too saying, “Some countries will have more problems than others with the arrival of the year 2000, but for most of us it will only be a minor inconvenience.”

Traffic lights were supposedly going to cause pile ups and cash machines would stop working. The American Red Cross didn’t help by issuing warnings and advice telling people to withdraw and keep cash in a safe place, fill their gas tanks, have alternative cooking methods planned and extra warm clothes in abundance.

One early 1999 article in The New York Times highlighted the threat to the medicine supplies.

In the piece, one women sounded warnings that people could die if the medicine supply were effected. From drug production and delivery to pharmacies and their electronic point of service systems, they were all potential points of failure in the drug supply chain.

Another big concern was that prisoners would be released early or that criminals would somehow use the glitch to get away with more crime. The FBI put our a warning, telling criminals there was no chance they would “‘slip through the cracks.”

As the new millennium neared conspiracy pushing shock jocks like Alex Jones declared this the end of civilized order over internet radio. Large lines began forming at cash machines all over the world.

People line up at a bank in Hong Kong to get cash before the millennium rollover. (Robyn Beck/Getty Images)

On December 29th, 1999, there was a large credit card machine outage in the United Kingdom. This was framed as the first sign of y2k-poacalypse. This was it, the beginning of the end as far as some were concerned.

Of course, the real threat never materialized. The year 2000 came in peaceably and free of apocalypse.

Was the Y2K panic a secular, technophobic version of a biblical end times prophecy? Or was it an example of civilizational forethought and collective action. Hindsight is 20/20, but it is clear much of the precautionary behavior turned reactionary. There are still debates today wether the billions spent on tackling the bug actually made a difference, with some sources citing little to no difference in impact on countries that prepared for the bug versus those that didn’t.

Whoever is right, one thing is certain, the world can never resist a modern Frankenstein narrative. What will the next one be, and how seriously will we need to take it?

--

--

Louis Anslow
Timeline

Solutionist • Tech-Progressive • Curator of Pessimists Archive