The Current State of Press Freedom
Have you ever paused to think about how free we really are to speak our minds or seek the truth? In my quest to peel back layers on digital freedoms, it’s become clear that press freedom is a critical topic worth exploring further. This isn’t just another rant of my pointing fingers at states that missbehave, it’s about drawing a clear line between the mission of tomi — to offer the world a truly free, alternative internet — and the harsh reality that genuine press freedom is a privilege enjoyed by only a fraction of the global population. Surprisingly, a mere 13% of the worlds’ population have access to a free press, highlighting a global issue that’s too big to ignore.
The internet, once praised as a beacon of freedom, is now often a tool for suppressing free speech and controlling the narrative. Imagine, more than half of the world are not free to say, read, write or print what they want. That’s not just a problem, it’s a crisis.
tomi’s mission is a response to this dire need for an internet where freedom isn’t just a buzzword but a reality. Because if we don’t stand up for our right to information and free expression, who will?
The issue isn’t limited to far-off dictatorships. It’s a pervasive shadow over much of the world, affecting us more than we might think. Let’s dive deeper into why this matters and what we can do about it.
The Global Decline of Press Freedom
If we start by breaking down the basics, press freedom is about the right to communicate and express ideas through any media without restrictions. It encompasses the liberty of journalists to report the truth without fear of retribution, censorship, or legal penalty. This freedom is instrumental in maintaining the checks and balances on power by ensuring transparency, accountability, and an informed citizenry. However, this ideal state is far from the global norm.
Recent trends indicate a disturbing decline in media freedom worldwide, affecting democracies and authoritarian regimes alike. The emergence of populist leaders in key democracies has led to concerted attempts to undermine the independence of the media sector. This assault on media freedom doesn’t just erode journalistic rights; it signifies a deeper, more alarming deterioration of democracy itself.
In the first half of 2023 alone, a staggering 575 media freedom violations were recorded across the European Union and candidate countries, involving 844 individuals or media outlets. These violations spanned verbal attacks, legal attacks, physical attacks, attacks on property, and censorship, showcasing the multi-faceted nature of the threats faced by journalists today. In Turkey, the situation has been particularly dire, with independent media facing intense scrutiny against the backdrop of devastating earthquakes and national elections. The climate of press freedom in Turkey remains challenging, with journalists navigating a landscape marked by significant restrictions and the looming threat of legal repercussions for critical reporting.
Hungary stands out as another example of this distressing shift where prime Minister Viktor Orbán, recognized by RSF as a press freedom predator, has orchestrated a significant media consolidation. The KESMA Foundation, a government ally, controls about 500 media organizations, heavily skewing the media landscape in favor of pro-government narratives. Yet, outlets like RTL Klub and 24.hu continue to uphold independent journalism, despite the pervasive control
Russia’s Press Freedom: From Independence to Censorship and Control
The situation in Russia marks an even more drastic turn for press freedom. Since the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Russia has witnessed an almost complete eradication of independent media voices. The government has either banned, blocked, or labeled almost all independent media outlets as “foreign agents” or “undesirable organizations,” subjecting the remaining media to stringent military censorship.
The media landscape has been dramatically altered, with all privately owned independent TV channels banned from broadcasting, except for some cable entertainment channels. Access to many Western media outlets, including Euronews, France 24, and the BBC, has been cut off. Russia’s media regulator, Roskomnadzor, has blocked most independent news sites, with notable ones like Meduza and Novaya Gazeta becoming inaccessible. The few surviving media outlets either belong to Kremlin allies or engage in severe self-censorship, avoiding banned subjects and terms.
Politically, President Vladimir Putin’s isolation has only intensified since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the war against Ukraine, leading to a government environment where decision-making is highly centralized. The Parliament effectively acts as a rubber stamp for decisions emanating from the Kremlin, with an official narrative dominated by propaganda, focusing on Russia’s “historical grievances” and various conspiracy theories.
The legal framework has become a tool for suppressing dissent, with journalists facing the threat of severe charges under vaguely worded draconian laws, hastily adopted and often incorporated into the Penal Code. The invasion of Ukraine accelerated the adoption of amendments targeting freedom of expression, including defamation and “fake news” laws. These amendments have made spreading “false information” about the Russian armed forces or any state body operating abroad punishable by up to 15 years in prison, significantly tightening the noose around journalistic freedom and independence.
Shocking Press Freedom Violations in Nigeria
Turning our focus to Africa where Nigeria’s 2023 elections presented a grim picture of press freedom in the country, with numerous incidents of physical attacks on journalists, bombings of broadcast stations, and government sanctions or threats against media houses reported. The elections were marked by chaos, rigging, violence, and killings, casting a long shadow over the state of democracy in Nigeria. Notable incidents included the bombing of media outlets owned by opposition politicians, physical assaults on journalists covering protests or elections, and arbitrary arrests and detentions. In one harrowing incident, police in Kwara state detained two journalists for ten days following a defamation complaint, illustrating the blatant impunity with which such violations occur. Another journalist was physically attacked by officers of the Federal Road Safety Corps in Abuja, showcasing the broad spectrum of threats journalists face in the country.
African Nations Grapple with Press Freedom Challenges
The situation in Africa mirrors troubling trends seen elsewhere, with Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and Ethiopia experiencing the highest number of threats to journalists in September 2023. Physical, verbal, and online attacks were the most common, but incidents of censorship, surveillance, and restricted access to information were also prevalent. State actors were identified as the main perpetrators of these violations, responsible for more than 85% of the attacks on journalists and media recorded in that period. In the DRC, a journalist was arrested for “spreading false rumors” and “disseminating false information,” highlighting the use of legal mechanisms to suppress journalistic voices. Ethiopia saw journalists assaulted and detained amid crackdowns on public protests, further illustrating the risks faced by media workers in the pursuit of truth.
Vietnam’s Veil of Censorship
In Vietnam, strict government control significantly restricts press freedom, placing the country near the bottom of the global Press Freedom Index, just ahead of North Korea.
The single-party government wields absolute power over media narratives, enforcing a regime where journalism oscillates between promoting state propaganda and navigating commercial survival. Independent reporters and bloggers, in their quest to illuminate truths beyond the party line, often face harsh repercussions, making Vietnam the world’s third-largest jailer of journalists. This grim statistic underscores the dangerous tightrope walked by those daring to challenge the state’s narrative.
State-affiliated media dominates, crafting narratives that align with government directives, especially during significant events like the Party’s founding day or Ho Chi Minh’s birthday, where the focus is on lauding the party’s achievements and the country’s development under socialism.
Journalists in Vietnam operate under the constant watch of the Communist Party, with editorial content often dictated by the Central Propaganda and Education Commission. This top-down censorship extends to suppressing not just political dissent but also any content that might reflect negatively on the party or its allies. The drive towards financial autonomy for media outlets since the Đổi Mới economic reforms has introduced a capitalistic twist to this censorship, adding layers of complexity where media must also cater to commercial interests to sustain operations.
This tightrope walk is exemplified by the state’s crackdown on independent journalism, with draconian laws punishing the dissemination of “false information” with severe penalties. The situation is further exacerbated by the intricate dance of financial survival that sees journalists competing for views and payments in a system that rewards alignment with state narratives and commercial success. The result is a media landscape where true independence is a mirage, and journalism’s foundational pillars of objectivity and critical reporting are eroded by the dual pressures of state censorship and capitalistic incentives.
The Battle for an Uncensored Internet
As our world edges closer to silence under the weight of censorship and control, the essence of democracy — our right to freely choose and believe in the truths that shape our reality — is under siege. The landscape of press freedom, once vast and diverse, now contracts under the shadow of authoritarian dictates, steering us towards a singular narrative, a collective ‘truth’ crafted not from the multitude of voices but from the dictates of power.
In the face of these mounting pressures, we cannot stand idly by. Democracy thrives on discourse, on the clash and melding of ideas to forge a future reflective of its people’s will. When the narrative is commandeered, when the stories told are those sanctioned by authority alone, we lose more than just the freedom of the press — we lose the very foundation upon which democratic societies are built.
The urgency for an alternative internet — one that genuinely mirrors the diverse voices of our society — has never been more apparent. As we witness the increasing suppression of voices across the globe, the mission of tomi becomes even more critical. We’re advocating for a fundamental right: access to an internet where everyone’s voice can be heard loud and clear — rid of censorship and manipulation. This isn’t just about creating a new platform; it’s about ensuring that the internet remains a place for free and open expression. tomi is at the forefront, pushing against the tide of control to ensure that the internet continues to be a dynamic forum for all, not just the few.
This fight for an alternative internet is a fight for the very essence of democracy and freedom.
Follow us for the latest information:
Website | Twitter | Discord | Telegram Announcements | Telegram Chat | Medium | Reddit | TikTok | YouTube
