The Rise of Digital Authoritarianism

Dag
tomipioneers
Published in
5 min readApr 24, 2024

A new form of iron curtain is descending upon many of us — not of concrete and barbed wire, but of firewalls and algorithms. The annual Freedom on the Net report, by research institute Freedom House, unveils a chilling escalation in digital authoritarianism, where governments increasingly harness the internet as an instrument of repression. I commend the work behind this organization, these are people that work tirelessly to expose forms of online repression and to help educate the public about the state of freedom on the internet across the world. This is a fight that resonates deeply with us here at tomi, and I encourage you to delve deeper into their website and the work they do to promote freedom worldwide. On their website, you will find even more detailed data and insightful analyses concerning a wide range of countries, offering a clearer picture of the global challenges we collectively, as netizens, face in preserving digital rights.

Their findings on the freedom of the internet are not just alarming, they are a wake-up call to the world, showcasing how the battle for the internet is intensifying in a time when digital rights equate to human rights.

The Ruthless Architects of Digital Dystopia

From the dark corners of state surveillance in Russia to the blatant cyber oppression in Myanmar, examples of digital authoritarianism are both widespread and deeply disturbing. In Russia, the government’s response to its invasion of Ukraine has included a sweeping crackdown on digital dissent. Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter were blocked, severing crucial lines of communication and information. More insidiously, the state has mandated that media outlets and online voices parrot the official narrative, branding the invasion as a “special military operation,” with penalties of up to 15 years in prison for those daring to deviate from this script.

Meanwhile, in Myanmar, the military junta’s grip on the internet is so severe that it mirrors Orwellian nightmares. Following the 2021 coup, the regime has throttled the internet to a mere trickle, allowing only about 1,200 whitelisted sites. To put this into perspective, consider that the internet hosts approximately 200 million active and regularly updated websites, making the extent of this censorship starkly apparent. The digital blackout is a deliberate strategy to stifle opposition and keep the populace in the dark, as the military brutalizes its citizens with impunity.

The Fragmentation of the Global Internet

This wave of authoritarian control is leading to a balkanized internet, where access is curtailed by national borders and the global village becomes a series of isolated digital ghettos. The concept of a free and open internet is being shattered, replaced by fragmented networks that serve nationalistic and repressive purposes. In Iran, for example, the regime is building its own national intranet, effectively a state-sanctioned echo chamber that filters what can be seen, said, or shared. This national network not only blocks access to the global internet but also monitors and controls internal communications, leaving citizens with a sanitized, government-approved version of reality.

China’s infamous Great Firewall represents perhaps the most advanced and disturbing form of this digital isolation, consistently earning the country the title of ‘the worst environment for internet freedom.’ The firewall blocks access to thousands of websites and censors search results to erase anything that might challenge the ruling party’s narrative. The situation intensified around high-profile events like the 2022 Beijing Olympics, where the state heightened its control to project an unblemished global image. Even more troubling is the deployment of sophisticated AI to monitor and manipulate social media, creating an environment where dissent is not just dangerous but nearly impossible to express without immediate repercussions. This was starkly demonstrated in the case of tennis player Peng Shuai, who vanished from public view after accusing a high-ranking Chinese Communist Party official of sexual assault. Her subsequent silence and controlled reappearance underscore the severe constraints on personal freedom and expression in China.

The Democratic Dilemma and Hypocrisy

The stark reality is that while authoritarian regimes are the most egregious offenders, democratic nations are also subject to scrutiny. Efforts to combat disinformation and cybercrime in democracies often tread a fine line, risking overreach that can impinge on the very freedoms they aim to uphold. For example, in efforts to curb online extremism, countries like France and Germany have implemented stringent laws requiring social media platforms to remove illegal content within tight deadlines.

While well-intentioned, these laws have raised concerns about undue censorship and the suppression of lawful speech, illustrating the complex balance between protecting public safety and preserving civil liberties. In Australia, recent legislation grants the government sweeping powers to monitor online activity, sparking debate about the potential for overreach and invasion of privacy. These instances demonstrate how the pursuit of security can sometimes lead democracies to adopt measures that inadvertently echo the repressive tactics they criticize in authoritarian regimes, challenging the integrity of their commitment to fundamental democratic principles.

The Call to Arms

The battle for the internet is more than a struggle over technology — it’s a fight for the soul of our global society. It’s about whether we will live in a world where information is free and rights are protected, or one where our realities are dictated by the demands of the powerful.

As digital citizens of the world, we must resist the encroachment of digital authoritarianism in all its forms. We need to support the efforts of activists, NGOs, international coalitions and projects like tomi that strive to maintain the internet as a global common— a place of free expression and innovation. We must demand greater transparency and accountability from both governments and big technology companies, ensuring they respect and protect digital rights.

Let this be our rallying cry: to stand firm against the tide of repression and keep the digital world free. The internet belongs to all of us, and it is up to all of us to defend it. The question remains: Will we rise to the challenge, or will we let the digital iron curtain close around us, sealing off a future where freedom is but a memory?

Follow us for the latest information:

Website | Twitter | Discord | Telegram Announcements | Telegram Chat | Medium | Reddit | TikTok | YouTube

--

--