Should You Lead or Follow?

What’s required to “lead” a venture capital deal

Scott Lenet
May 11 · 6 min read
Image: Shutterstock

I’ve been lucky to be given a lot of responsibility in my venture capital career. In the early 2000s, I was entrusted by the largest pension fund in the United States, CalPERS, to become a founding General Partner in a seed stage venture capital firm.

Joncarlo Mark, the founder of Upwelling Capital Group, was formerly a Senior Portfolio Manager in the Alternative Investment Management group at CalPERS, where he was responsible for the investment in my fund. From 2007 to 2010, he also served as chair of the Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA), whose 300 member organizations oversaw over $1 trillion of private equity capital. Before we closed the deal, I remember Joncarlo charging me to “deliver alpha” by finding my own deals, and not simply riding on the coattails of well-known Silicon Valley venture capital investors. He explicitly said that he expected our firm to lead deals, and not just follow. Today, he reflects:

“Being able to select new managers is critical to generating outperformance. Over my 12 year career at CalPERS, it was our ability to find groups that offered a differentiated strategy that helped us outperform our benchmarks. We sought out managers who were leaders within their strategy. We also selected groups that we determined had the best sourcing capabilities, were willing to be decisive about which deals to lead, and could truly add value to their portfolio companies.”

Choosing to lead can also be valuable to entrepreneurs seeking to catalyze their funding rounds. I’ve been approached by many founders who have attracted interested investors wanting to “follow” by participating in the round, in which case the CEO is “looking for a lead.”

But what is required to lead a deal in venture capital? Historically, leading has been defined two ways:

1. Write the term sheet and negotiate the deal with the entrepreneur

2. Put the most money in the round

While the technical definition of leading is structuring the deal and negotiating terms, the two definitions have become intertwined.

A round cannot occur without agreed upon terms. Someone has to step up to say “I am willing to fund on these terms and at this price.” Except in angel rounds where the startup provides the terms to investors with no negotiations, whoever takes responsibility for delivering the term sheet and set the terms of the deal is considered the lead.

In many cases, structuring terms does coincide with writing the largest check. The National Venture Capital Association’s 2020 “enhanced model term sheet” includes historical information detailing the percentage of each round purchased by lead investors. The data is remarkably consistent measuring rounds from Series Seed to Series D+, with averages ranging from 47.1% to 58.2%. In other words, in a typical round, the lead investor puts in about half the money. This would mean in a $10 million round, the lead investor would commit about $5 million.

Source: NVCA & Aumni

My colleague Allison Goldberg formerly ran Time Warner Investments, where she preferred to invest at least 50% of the round when leading a venture deal:

“At Time Warner Investments, we acted as lead investor in about half of the deals we funded. That means we negotiated and issued term sheets, invested at least half the round, served on the board of directors, and often controlled the series of preferred stock that we held. The board seats were typically occupied by a member of our investment team, but sometimes one of the execs from one of our divisions would serve on the board if that would be more helpful to the portfolio company. Leading deals facilitated mutually beneficial relationships between us and the companies we invested in, and helped us achieve both our strategic and financial goals.”

However, there are multiple reasons why venture capital investors might decide not to lead a round:

  • If you don’t have conviction about the deal, meaning you aren’t really sure you believe it’s a good investment. In my opinion, this is a bad reason not to lead, and has resulted in the stereotype that VCs are like lemmings who cannot make up their own minds.

What about corporate venture capitalists?

Corporate investors (CVCs) historically have not led deals primarily for the second reason above, which is lack of experience with venture capital terms. With the increasing sophistication of the CVC community, including external advisors who can provide deal structuring expertise, this is no longer a good excuse. As Allison Goldberg indicates, experienced CVCs can be comfortable leading when appropriate.

Whether to lead or follow is one of more than a dozen key decisions when starting and running a venture capital fund, whether that vehicle represents institutional capital, an angel fund, or a corporate program focused on strategic investing. Understanding what’s required to lead can help facilitate a logical strategy that helps the fund and its portfolio companies, too.

Scott Lenet is President of Touchdown Ventures, a Registered Investment Adviser that provides “Venture Capital as a Service” to help corporations launch and manage their investment programs.

Unless otherwise indicated, commentary on this site reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints and analyses of the author and should not be regarded as a description of services provided by Touchdown or its affiliates. The opinions expressed here are for general informational purposes only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual on any security or advisory service. It is only intended to provide education about the financial industry. The views reflected in the commentary are subject to change at any time without notice. While all information presented, including from independent sources, is believed to be accurate, we make no representation or warranty as to accuracy or completeness. We reserve the right to change any part of these materials without notice and assume no obligation to provide updates. Nothing on this site constitutes investment advice, performance data or a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Investing involves the risk of loss of some or all of an investment. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Risky Business

Thoughts on corporate VC from the team at Touchdown…

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store