EPA says a pesticide is harmful for children; Scott Pruitt says let’s use it on our crops

Kara Cook-Schultz
Apr 7, 2017 · 3 min read
Image for post
Image for post
Photo credit: Flickr jetsandzeppelins

Last year, an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) panel found that a chemical pesticide, chlorpyrifos, is at any level. So in November of 2016, the EPA proposed to completely ban its use.

But last week the EPA changed course: Scott Pruitt that EPA will let Big Ag keep using this chemical on food.

The controversy over chlorpyrifos began more than a decade ago, when the EPA first the indoor use of the insecticide, but continued to allow its use on food crops. After this decision, the EPA studied the risks of eating food treated with the pesticide. Jim Jones, former assistant administrator of the EPA, scientists followed hundreds of mothers and their newborn children, monitoring their exposure.

EPA scientists found that 90 percent of American women of childbearing age have of chlorpyrifos in their bloodstream. Studies showed that at age seven, the average IQ of children who had been exposed to high levels of chlorpyrifos was a few percentage points lower than children who hadn’t been exposed to much of the chemical at all. And in November of 2016, the EPA some toddlers are exposed to levels that are above what the EPA scientists considered a “safe” limit.

In the face of this evidence, the agency an outright ban on chlorpyrifos last year. After all, the agency’s own chemical safety experts found that crops sprayed with the insecticide are dangerous to ingest. But then last week, the EPA reversed course. Scott Pruitt’s EPA quietly that it was not going to ban chlorpyrifos, after all.

The of the EPA is to protect human health and the environment. It is the agency’s duty to review risks associated with the pesticides we use and take appropriate action. The law on pesticides (the Federal Fungicide, Insecticide, and Rodenticide Act) is very strict: it “a reasonable certainty that no harm will result,” to consumers or people living in the areas where pesticides are applied.

In this case, there is a reasonable certainty that harm is ongoing from the use of this pesticide. I’m angry and I’m calling for a change. You should be, too. We can do something about this — we can tell the EPA that this is unacceptable.

The EPA is required to complete the next re-evaluation of chlorpyrifos by . That’s too late; children and their brains are at risk now. The EPA needs to convene their re-evaluation today, and following their own scientific results, the agency should ban chlorpyrifos.

Image for post
Image for post

U.S. PIRG

U.S. PIRG

Kara Cook-Schultz

Written by

US PIRG Toxics Director. Public health advocate.

U.S. PIRG

U.S. PIRG

U.S. PIRG is a consumer group that stands up to powerful interests whenever they threaten our health and safety, our financial security, or our right to fully participate in our democratic society. Part of the Public Interest Network. https://uspirg.org/

Kara Cook-Schultz

Written by

US PIRG Toxics Director. Public health advocate.

U.S. PIRG

U.S. PIRG

U.S. PIRG is a consumer group that stands up to powerful interests whenever they threaten our health and safety, our financial security, or our right to fully participate in our democratic society. Part of the Public Interest Network. https://uspirg.org/

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch

Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore

Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store