Caleb Roenigk_Flickr

The public never gets to know who won more than 50% of tenders published by Local Government and the NHS according to data on Contracts Finder, the Government’s tender portal. Across the whole of Government 43% of tenders do not have a contract award even though publishing contract award data is a legal requirement.1

Using data taken from Contracts Finder, we have counted up all the tenders that had deadlines more than a year ago and yet are still missing contract award notices. However, because the public sector often uses frameworks, contracts that can be used multiple times by different buyers, the number of contract awards should actually exceed the number of tenders. This means that there are far more contract awards missing, we just can’t know how many.

Central government had the best response rate, publishing 81% of its contract awards. Local government and the NHS fared less well, publishing 48% and 43% of their contract awards respectively. The worst performers were procurement organisations.* These bodies conduct procurement on behalf of multiple public sector buyers, often within a region or a specific sector. Despite being procurement specialists and publishing a high volume of tenders, on average 7 tenders per month, these organisations only published 60% of contract awards.

Buyer type: Procurement organisations

Tenders: 2,778

Missing contracts: 1,654

Percent missing: 59.5%

Buyer type: NHS

Tenders: 3,021

Missing contracts: 1,720

Percent missing: 56.9%

Buyer type: Local Government

Tenders: 17,408

Missing contracts: 9,127

Percent missing: 52.4%

Buyer type: Emergency Services

Tenders: 405

Missing contracts: 117

Percent missing: 28.9%

Buyer type: Higher Education

Tenders: 5,847

Missing contracts: 1,678

Percent missing: 28.7%

Buyer type: Other

Tenders: 7,996

Missing contracts: 1,661

Percent missing: 20.8%

Buyer type: Central Government

Tenders: 8,368

Missing contracts: 1,625

Percent missing: 19.4%

Of the buyers who published over 20 tenders, 11 have published no contract awards and only 11 have published a contract award for every tender.

Buyers with no contract awards:

BRITISH LIBRARY

DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY

EAST MIDLANDS STRATEGIC COMMERCIAL UNIT

EPSOM AND ST HELIER UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST

KING’S COLLEGE LONDON

SAINT HELENA GOVERNMENT

SALISBURY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

SOUTH OXFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL

STAFFORDSHIRE AND LANCASHIRE COMMISSIONING SUPPORT UNIT

UNIVERSITY OF DERBY

UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER

Buyers with an award for every tender:

CABINET OFFICE

DEPARTMENT FOR CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT

GOVERNMENT DIGITAL SERVICE

HIGHWAYS ENGLAND

INDEPENDENT POLICE COMPLAINTS COMMISSION

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE

LONDON FIRE BRIGADE

SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE

SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY

STEVENAGE BOROUGH COUNCIL

UK HYDROGRAPHIC OFFICE

Conclusions

There is a significant shortfall in the publishing of contract awards and the failure to publish is widespread. Publishing rates vary significantly across different types of buying organisation, which indicates that 100% publishing could be attained, were buyers sufficiently motivated to publish this data. Clearly the legal mandate to publish is insufficient to improve publishing rates.

Perhaps it is time to consider introducing a law similar to the one adopted in Slovakia where a contract is invalid unless openly published within three months of being signed.2 This law has had a positive impact on corruption, saving public money while improving the business climate. The data has been used by citizens, journalists and public servants, thereby improving transparency.

Methodology

This analysis was conducted on the 1st and 2nd of November, 2017. We gather tender and contract data from the Contracts Finder API daily. To begin this analysis, we counted the tenders published on Contracts Finder and contract awards linked to the original tender on Contracts Finder, 365 days after the original tender was published, covering the period from March 2014 to October 2016. We linked this to public sector entities and added buyer types to all these entities that had published over 20 tenders in the period analysed.

*Procurement Organisations

EAST MIDLANDS STRATEGIC COMMERCIAL UNIT

EASTERN SHIRES PROCUREMENT ORGANISATION

LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHARED SERVICES

NHS SHARED BUSINESS SERVICES

NORTH EAST PROCUREMENT ORGANISATION

NORTH OF ENGLAND COMMERCIAL PROCUREMENT COLLABORATIVE

SOUTH EAST SHARED SERVICES

SOUTH OF ENGLAND PROCUREMENT SERVICES

UK SHARED BUSINESS SERVICES LTD

WELLAND PROCUREMENT UNIT

WEST YORKSHIRE COMBINED AUTHORITY

YORKSHIRE PROCUREMENT ORGANISATION

--

--