1st place by Rogelio Moreno. A 40X image of a microscopic rotifer showing the interior of its mouth, and heart shaped corona.

It’s A Small World, First of All

The best images from Nikon’s 40th photo microscopy contest

Doug Bierend
Vantage
Published in
4 min readNov 3, 2014

--

Sometimes to see the beauty in something you have to look a little closer … like, 1000x closer.

3rd Place by Noah Fram-Schwartz. Jumping Spider Eyes. Reflected Light at 20X.

It’s not news that our great big world is composed of countless tiny, tiny things. For the last 40 years, Nikon has challenged photographers to get all up in the smallest of subjects, in the hopes of bringing us new ways of seeing them. Their annual Small World competition is meant to promote technical and scientific innovation — as much as pure aesthetic beauty — in the field of light microscopy. The best examples come from professionals and amateurs alike.

“What began as a competition to recognize our customer-base for their achievements has evolved into something that has made us curators of scientific imagery in the field,” says Nikon Instruments’ Communications Manager, Eric Flem.

Above: Honorable mention by Geir Drange. Leptothorax acervorum (ant) carrying its larva. Reflected Light, Focus Stacking at 5x. Below: 8th place by Dr. Igor Robert Siwanowicz at Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI). Appendages of a common brine shrimp at 100x.

This year’s champion is Rogelio Moreno — his winning image of an open-mouthed rotifer is at the top of this post. The runners up include a close-up of calcite crystal, a pair of jumping spider eyeballs (above), the cells and DNA of a cow’s pulmonary artery, and the gripping appendage of a caterpillar.

4th place by Karin Panser at Institute of Molecular Pathology I.M.P. Caterpillar proleg with circle of gripping hooks in red. Confocal, Autofluorescence at 20x.

The invisible intimacies of chemicals, minerals, or microorganisms are all fair game. Images are awarded for their visual beauty or technical complexity. Whether or not they’re chosen, the candidate photos are almost always astounding. The variety of the subjects and approaches reveals the seemingly endless facets of a vast, hidden micro-verse that surrounds us.

Above: 2nd place by Alessandro Da Mommio at Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Pisa. Rhombohedral cleavage in calcite crystal at 10x. Below: 18th place by Jens H. Petersen at MycoKey. Anagallis arvensis (scarlet pimpernel). Macroscopy at 80x.

“Each photo must be relevant to science, but also exhibit exemplary technique and artistic ability,” says Flem. “Aside from the technical aspects, sometimes it’s based on the emotions of the judges and what strikes them as beautiful image.”

Above: 13th place by Charles Krebs. Conochilus unicornis (rotifer), actively feeding. This rotifer species forms a free floating spherical colony. Differential Interference Contrast at 417x. Below: 16th place by Nils Lindstrom at the Roslin Institute. Three transgenic kidneys cultured together, showing colliding branching collecting duct systems. Confocal at 20x.

This year, more than 1200 entries from 79 countries were considered by a panel of four judges, comprised of two scientists and a pair of online journalists. The idea is to strike a balance of noting a visually beautiful image that’s also got a degree of research value. In previous years, technical ground has even been broken, as in the 2007 winner which introduced fluorescence in a novel way to image a mouse embryo.

Above: Honorable mention by Fabrice Parais. Air pearl in the middle of larva Stratiomyidae respiratory fringe (Diptera aquatic larva). Stereomicroscopy at 30x. Below: 14th place by Ali Erturk. Mouse brain vasculature. Light-sheet fluorescent microscopy at 2x.

The rise of digital photography has led to the number of contestants rising from the hundreds into the thousands. As of 2011, a video component to the microscopy competition has been held, and a separate initiative with Florida State University called MicroscopyU aims to foster education in the science, technique and tenets of microscopy.

While Nikon does produce microscope optics, they concede that the scientific import of a given image isn’t exactly within the scope of their expertise.

Honorable mention Magdalena Turzanska at theInstitute of Experimental Biology, University of Wroclaw. Nowellia curvifolia (leafy liverwort) gametophyte, berberine stained. Epi-autofluorescence with Z-stack Reconstruction at 125x.

“We do know imaging,” Flen says, “and there were no photography contests at the time, to our knowledge, that covered scientific imaging. The contest isn’t as much about celebrating a specific microscope, but microscopy in general.”

13th place by Charles Krebs. Chrysochroa buqueti (jewel beetle) carapace, near eye. Diffused, Reflected Illumination at 45x.

Winners of this year’s Small World will see their images included in a calendar and will be taken on a national museum tour.

Twitter | Facebook | Instagram

--

--

Doug Bierend
Vantage
Editor for

Wandering freelance writer and author living in upstate New York.