Microsoft Audit Types Explained
Microsoft has at its disposal multiple mechanisms to audit their customers and ensure that their intellectual property is protected. The type of audit mechanism used by Microsoft is dependent on various factors including organisation size, location, and type of licensing program in use.
Organisations must understand what their obligations are and what the potential outcomes from a Microsoft license compliance engagement could be. The table below provides an overview of the types of audit mechanisms commonly used by Microsoft to verify license compliance.
When the interpretive nature of Microsoft software licensing contracts is combined with a lack of Software Asset Management “SAM” policies, processes and procedures, it comes as no surprise that conditions are created whereby Microsoft need to take steps to protect their intellectual property by engaging customers to verify their license position.
Regardless of the audit mechanism used to verify an effective license position, organisations must take the necessary steps to plan for a successfully controlled audit process to minimise operational impact and avoid unnecessary financial exposure.
Version 1 has considerable experience in helping multi-national enterprises proactively assess their license compliance position and plan for the future by adopting a proactive approach to software asset management (SAM) for Microsoft. So, whether you are under threat of an audit or struggling with creating a new standard internally, contact us for advice and guidance.
About the Author
Karl is a Principal Licensing Consultant at Version 1, providing Microsoft license expertise to customers globally and ensuring customers get the best value from their Microsoft assets. If you would like more information about mitigating against the cost and risk of License Audits, get in touch with the independent licensing experts at Version 1 today.
