Crypto Wallet API (Ledger API) for Streamlined Fintech Development
At the core of the cryptocurrency ethos is decentralization — a principle that fosters the free exchange of data across various platforms. This free flow of information is often facilitated through APIs, with most, if not all, exchanges and wallet data being accessible this way.
Crypto wallet APIs like Vezgo and Plaid Crypto play an indispensable role in this landscape.
The importance of a crypto wallet API in boosting product performance, enhancing operational agility, and driving cost reduction cannot be overstated. APIs — for instance, the Ledger API — simplify the gathering and amalgamation of essential data like account balances and transactions, transforming it into a self-reliant and smooth operation.
However, the path to assimilating different exchanges, blockchains, and wallets within the Web3 realm can be a formidable challenge. Companies that require confidential details such as account balances, token positions, and transaction data are well aware of the hurdles that come with integrating each new CeFi and DeFi breakthrough.
These hurdles include addressing security concerns, the overwhelming task of maintaining extensive documentation, and the constant need to adapt to changing API specifications.
Implementing the Ledger API and other crypto wallet APIs is never a one-time task. The changing landscape of API specifications, the struggle to keep pace with rate limits, and the inevitable roadblocks in your implementation require regular maintenance and updates. It typically requires a dedicated team of developers who are constantly creating new connections and repairing any that may be breaking down.
This article’s subsequent sections will explore in depth the four prominent challenges intrinsic to in-house API integrations: the relentless requirement for new API integrations, the task of upkeeping top-notch documentation, dealing with API versioning, and navigating security risks. Subsequently, we will assess the financial implications of these development challenges.
Navigating the Complexity of In-House Crypto Wallet API Integrations
1. API Orchestration — Dealing with Scale
An ever-expanding crypto landscape with entities such as Ledger API, MetaMask Wallet, KuCoin API, and more, coupled with approximately 600 crypto exchanges, makes the task of building and maintaining APIs for each of them quite daunting.
API coordination refers to the merging of multiple application integrations into a single API. Bringing disparate systems together, however, is anything but a one-size-fits-all process.
As customers demand new application integrations, each connection requires manual creation by your developers. Some connectors can take several days to develop and require weekly patching. As your company expands the variety of connectors offered and developed in-house, managing these connectors can become an onerous task for your development team.
Developers find themselves spending hours dealing with the intricacies of synchronizing multiple APIs and addressing compatibility issues. These issues associated with building and maintaining these connections can quickly divert your team’s focus from building value-added features.
2. API Documentation — The Need for Accurate API Docs
Lack of documentation or poorly executed API integrations are common roadblocks for developers. Requiring your developers to document integrations significantly increases their workload, on top of the regular coding documentation they are tasked with. Ensuring the continued success of your integrations across multiple developers requires proper and up-to-date documentation.
Large integrations involving multiple contributors require a high level of coordination and collaboration to ensure consistency in documentation and adherence to a pre-determined set of standards. Crypto wallet APIs are dynamic in nature and evolve to fix broken connections and implement other patches. As a result, documentation must be updated to reflect changes in features and functionality.
3. API Versioning — Navigating Through Changes
Crypto wallet API integrations need to be frequently revised while still providing support for older versions. These enhancements or fixes must be implemented seamlessly without disrupting API users and need to be explicitly communicated. This meticulous handling of challenges is encapsulated by the term API Versioning.
The time your developers invest in maintaining compatibility among various API versions, offering clear guidance and documentation, and phasing out old API versions could be more productively spent on the development of your core products.
An unreliable API can severely impact your business operations. For instance, if a crypto trader can’t upload his latest crypto positions due to a Ledger API instability, it’s probable that they will lose faith in your product, which can lead them to seek alternatives.
4. API Security — Mitigating Breaches
API security is one of the biggest challenges when it comes to crypto wallet API integrations, especially in scenarios involving financial data. Major data breaches and hacks are often the result of vulnerable APIs. In the U.S. alone, it is estimated that companies have lost tens of billions of dollars due to API-related security threats. As the number of APIs continues to grow, this figure is expected to escalate.
When sensitive data is in play, security certifications hold significant value in assessing the security level of API integrations. The most widely recognized certifications include SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001. These certifications serve to validate that organizations that develop and maintain APIs enforce stringent controls and processes for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. They also ensure that the organization adheres to relevant regulations and industry standards, demonstrating their commitment to security and compliance.
Incorporating robust security into your API integrations entails establishing measures to safeguard the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of data flowing through the APIs, all while restricting access to authorized users only.
Cost Implications & Crypto Wallet API Integration Expenses
While APIs serve as powerful tools for increasing productivity and simplifying data collection processes, the financial implications of building and maintaining APIs in-house can be significant. The decision to build your own API integrations in-house, as opposed to leveraging existing solutions, comes with several cost factors.
Consider the challenge of developing a Bitcoin connector, commonly known as xPub, for instance. The shortcut of using a block explorer API might seem appealing initially, however, as you scale, you’ll be faced with premium costs. When adding changes into the equation, both the cost and the complexity of the API spiral upwards.
This system rapidly becomes unmanageable, forcing you to consider your own node infrastructure and a major refactoring of your endpoints.
1. Building Costs:
The process of developing crypto wallet API integrations internally is both a time and resource-intensive endeavour. The financial burden isn’t limited to digital infrastructure expenses; it extends to cover the remuneration of developers, testers, project overseers, and training personnel. To illustrate, in the U.S., the average annual earnings of a software developer sit at approximately $110,000.
2. Maintenance Costs:
Upon the successful creation of the API integration, the task of maintaining it begins. This involves handling any major or minor glitches that may arise, ensuring the availability of updated and necessary documentation, and providing user support. These factors demand consistent financial dedication and tend to augment over time as your number of users scale.
3. Market Data API Costs:
Then, there’s the inevitable bill for the crypto market data required to enrich the data you’ve extracted from exchanges and blockchains. Depending on the service you use and the granularity you need for your application, this could range from a few thousands to a hundred thousand dollars per year.
This isn’t optional, especially when building a fintech application where fiat equivalent data accuracy is mandatory.
4. The Hidden Opportunity Costs:
The decision to develop API integrations in-house also bears significant potential costs. The allocation of resources and time towards the creation and upkeep of a crypto wallet API detracts from other potentially beneficial projects. For instance, a firm with limited resources that invests six months and $500,000 in the internal development of API integrations might have been better served using those resources to innovate a new product or service, or pursue other strategic initiatives that could yield considerable revenue.
Once that all your crypto integrations are up and running, the journey doesn’t end there. There is usually an additional 10 hours weekly only for maintenance and improvements. API alterations can occur without prior notice, and dealing with data inconsistencies and break fixes become an integral part of your routine.
The necessity of fine-tuning rate-limiting, an essential step to guarantee that the fintech users can sync their data without overloading the crypto wallet API or getting blocked by downstream services.
As the integrations multiply and scale, so too does the infrastructure, as well as the demand for enhanced security, compliance, and monitoring on these endpoints.
Crypto Wallet API Integration Approach: An Opportunity to Reevaluate
While the prospect of in-house API development might appear appealing due to its potential for customization, the inherent challenges and costs often go underestimated. In some instances, selecting a pre-existing, tried-and-tested API provider might prove to be more economical, efficient, and secure.
Companies leaning towards this alternative often justify the investment by measuring the tangible and potential costs associated with the construction and maintenance of API integrations. In doing so, they swiftly aggregate data from other applications, enabling them to play their true value-adding roles effectively.
Balancing In-House Crypto API Integrations (e.g., Ledger API) Vs. Using Vezgo
If your goal is to bring together data from multiple sources in the crypto world, consolidated crypto wallet APIs like Vezgo provide a unified, comprehensive interface.
The service acts as a single point of access to a multitude of crypto-asset platforms. With just one API integration, Vezgo oversees the entire service architecture, secures the data, and provides access to all the main exchanges, blockchains, and wallets like Ledger API. Vezgo is considered the best connector for Bitcoin tracking via xPub, yPub, and zPub.
As such, Vezgo allows you to reach data from NFTs on 6 chains, 40 crypto exchanges, 250 wallets, and 20 blockchains through just one API. This can offer significant advantages when compared to maintaining separate API integrations for each data source.
Using aggregated APIs can drastically decrease the burden on developers. It reduces the necessity for extensive testing and maintenance and also limits the volume of code that needs to be composed.
Aggregated APIs also afford the opportunity to deliver a more consistent user experience. The ability to fetch all data through a single interface allows for a homogenized presentation of information, simplifying understanding and utilization for end-users.
Data Enrichment
An aggregated crypto wallet API often provides more holistic data than individual APIs. As it pulls data from multiple sources, it paints a more detailed picture of a particular subject or scenario. This feature is particularly useful in applications where comprehensive data from diverse sources is crucial for decision-making or user information delivery, such as portfolio tracking, or tax.
Ready to See Vezgo, the Crypto Wallet API, In Action?
Get your API Keys, check out the API Docs, and connect your first wallet to get a sample of the data.
