Workers Are Literally Dying to Build American Warships

Workplace safety at U.S. shipyards is a growing concern

War Is Boring
War Is Boring

--

by NEIL GORDON

On Feb. 10, 2017, the Center for Investigative Reporting published a disturbing exposé of the national defense shipbuilding industry, documenting how the U.S. Navy and Coast Guard award billions of dollars in contracts to shipbuilders with lax safety standards. The article starkly illustrated the lack of accountability in the industry and the “unhealthy codependency” between the major shipbuilding companies and Uncle Sam.

The article focused on one company, VT Halter Marine and a deadly explosion at its Escatawpa, Mississippi shipyard in November 2009. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration initially fined the shipmaker $1.3 million for violations relating to the explosion, which killed two workers and injured five others. OSHA later reduced the fine to $837,000.

One month after the explosion, the Navy awarded VT Halter an $87 million contract to build an oceanographic survey ship. Since then, regulators have cited the company for other workplace safety and environmental violations, yet it is still receiving federal contracts.

The government’s top three shipbuilders — General Dynamics, Huntington Ingalls Industries, and Austal USA — also have documented histories of misconduct. In 2012, OSHA hit General Dynamics with a $171,300 fine for violations at its shipyard in Bath, Maine.

Above — USNS ‘Impeccable’, a VT Halter-made ship. At top — USNS Howard Lorenzen, another VT Halter product. U.S. Navy photos

The Center for Investigative Reporting found a startling lack of concern for safety on the part of the Navy. “We are not the overlords of private shipyards when it comes to workplace safety,” a Navy spokesman told reporter Jennifer Gollan.

Gollan found that from 2005 through 2015 there were 76 fatalities in the shipbuilding and repair industry, with at least a quarter of those deaths occurring at shipyards owned by federal contractors. She warned that working conditions at these shipyards could get worse as the Navy, with support from President Trump, prepares to significantly expand the size of its fleet.

Several factors have created this dire situation.

First, the government has few alternatives when it comes to building or repairing ships. For national security reasons, the US-based companies must perform most of the work.

Among them, only a small number are able to meet the government’s needs. Financial pressure on these shipbuilders, who heavily depend on federal contracts, often leads to shortcuts that create hazardous work environments.

Second, shipyard workers and their families have limited legal recourse for workplace injuries and fatalities. The Navy and Coast Guard are more concerned with production than safety.

Instead, accountability is largely up to agencies like OSHA and the Environmental Protection Agency. Those agencies levy fines, which amount to a slap on the wrist to companies with billions of dollars in contracts.

Third, federal regulations governing how government officers evaluate and select contractors under-emphasize companies’ workplace safety records. Pres. Barack Obama tried to remedy this with his Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces executive order, which required companies to disclose labor violations.

But in 2016, a federal judge blocked the disclosure requirement and Congress is now moving to abolish it entirely. Nevertheless, companies are disclosing health and safety violations in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System, which agencies must check before awarding contracts and grants.

We hope the Center for Investigative Reporting’s account sparks reforms. There is a cruel irony in spending billions of dollars to keep our country safe, yet simultaneously endangering the lives of workers in the shipbuilding industry.

This article originally appeared at the website of the Project on Government Oversight.

--

--