Check your U.S. voter registration status or register to vote here.

Would Donald Trump erase Grand Canyon National Park?

Make no mistake: His administration’s monument review is an attack on our national parks

Andre F. Miller
Aug 16, 2017 · 3 min read
Image for post
Image for post

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke’s of national monuments cuts deep into our nation’s conservation legacy, targeting the very law used to protect a majority of national parks in the American West. The secretary is expected to announce whether he’ll recommend President Trump eliminate or shrink national monuments across the country next week, on the eve of the National Park Service’s 101st birthday.

by presidents using their authority under the Antiquities Act. In the West, of national parks were protected as national monuments using the same law.

The secretary’s efforts to eviscerate national monuments undermines the foundation of America’s protected public lands, placing a target on every single American park and monument.

The Antiquities Act of 1906, designed to protect special places threatened by looting and development, was signed into law by Theodore Roosevelt and used by both Republican and Democratic presidents to protect America’s lands and waters. Many of our most iconic places were protected as national monuments using the Antiquities Act and later turned into national parks by Congress. This includes national parks such as the Grand Canyon in Arizona, Arches in Utah, Grand Teton in Wyoming, and Denali in Alaska.

If Secretary Zinke moves to eliminate current national monuments, how will it tarnish our national parks?

Image for post
Image for post
, first protected using the Antiquities Act.

Had Secretary Zinke been completing his review of national monuments when the Grand Canyon was protected under the Antiquities Act, would he have recommended eliminating its protections? The answer is almost certainly yes (it would have been politically expedient at the time, allowing mining to proceed).

Secretary Zinke’s review of national monuments, lands protected using the same law that protected the Grand Canyon, is deeply unpopular.

In fact, only of registered voters trust Secretary Zinke to make decisions about the status of national monuments and other federally protected lands. When Secretary Zinke asked Americans to comment on his review of national monuments, expressed support for keeping or expanding monument designations.

At a time when national parks are , Americans know Secretary Zinke’s review is an attack on America’s conservation legacy. Any number of current national monuments, spectacular places in their own right, could one day become national parks. Unfortunately, if Secretary Zinke has his way, these protections will be wiped off the map.

Image for post
Image for post


Stories about public lands and the outdoors from the Center…

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface.

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox.

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store