The question no-one is asking about “Leaving Neverland”
Wade Robson is one of the two men who are now accusing Michael Jackson of sexually abusing him, the allegations being the talk of the town as it forms part of a new documentary called “Leaving Neverland” which makes its premier this week.
For all those that don’t know, Wade Robson has been defending Michael Jackson against all sexual abuse allegations his entire life, he even did this in court under heavy cross-examination back in 2005. However, in 2012 he changed his story and announced Michael Jackson was sexually abusing him and that he didn’t realise he was being abused. That’s the wrap up of the situation, now for the glaringly obvious question that no media entity from major TV networks, to entertainment publications, to even music publications are asking.
If Michael Jackson did in fact sexually abuse Wade Robson, why would he call Wade Robson up as the FIRST witness to defend him in court in 2005.
It defies all logic. Michael Jackson was facing serious time if found guilty, so hypothetically if he did in fact sexually abuse little boys, it would be insane to call a witness that you actually abused, and the first one at that <insert confused face meme>. FYI, the other accuser who is part of this documentary James Safechuck testified under oath and defended Michael Jackson in court as well.
I can’t find any plausible reason if Michael Jackson is guilty, that he would call his “victims” to the witness stand to defend him— this simple question throws out any credibility to these allegations.
