Ethereum’s Hard Fork and What it Means for the Market

Vladislav Shabanov
WhitePark Capital
Published in
5 min readOct 11, 2018
Source: Amazon.com (Book by Jonathan Harris)

The Ethereum blockchain is gearing up for a hard fork. Around October 14th, 2018, the Constantinople hardfork is set to hit Ethereum’s testnet “ropsten”, and if all is well, the hard fork will occur on the Ethereum mainnet within the next three months.

The Ethereum Network is currently in the first stage of their third milestone — Metropolis v. Byzantium. The upcoming Constantinople hard fork is the second stage of Metropolis.

Constantinople will be the first version of Ethereum to introduce a Proof-of-Stake consensus system. Although a majority of the transactions on Ethereum will remain Proof-of-Work, every 100th transaction in Constantinople will use Proof-of-Stake consensus; this will help ease the transition to Serenity, Ethereum’s final milestone that is entirely Proof-of-Stake.

Within the Constantinople hard fork, five Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIP’s) will be implemented. Most of these EIP’s will tweak technical aspects of the Ethereum blockchain to optimize efficiency and lower total gas costs. A majority of these upgrades most likely won’t be recognized by the layman, but one proposal in particular — EIP 1234 — will significantly affect the network and be felt by developers, cryptocurrency miners, and laymen alike.

Why the Hard fork?

If the Ethereum blockchain does not undergo a hard fork in the near future, the mining difficulty on the network will increase to the point that block verification times will be so slow, that activity on the network will come close to a standstill; this problem is better known as the Ethereum Difficulty Bomb or the Ethereum Ice-Age.

So one of the main reasons to hard fork the Ethereum network is to delay the Ice-Age; Constantinople, more specifically, EIP 1234, delays the ice-age by another 12 months. Additionally, there will be four more Ethereum Improvement Proposals implemented into the network in the Constantinople hard fork; EIP 1283, EIP 145, EIP 1014, and EIP 1052.

Source: Simply Explained — SavJee (EIP 1283 not pictured in photo)

Most of these changes have to do with the operational efficiency and cost of op-codes on the Ethereum Virtual Machine, and most likely won’t be recognizable to the layman.

The EIPS and What They Do

Ethereum Improve Proposals 145, 1283, and 1052 make the Ethereum Virtual Machine — the engine that executes smart contracts — more efficient and lowers the cost of running smart contracts on Ethereum.

EIP 145 implements Bitwise shifting, which speeds up the arithmetic on the network and lowers the gas cost of transactions — this will make it cheaper to run certain smart contracts on Ethereum.

EIP 1052 increases the efficiency regarding the computing time of contracts, instead of checking the bytecode of a contract, EIP 1052 will make it so that only the hash — or the digital fingerprint — of the contract is checked.

EIP 1283 adjusts gas metering for SStore opcodes, as a result, there should be friendlier pricing for storage change caches.

EIP 1014 introduces state channels to the Ethereum network. Similar to the Lightning network on Bitcoin, state channels will allow transactions to happen off of the main chain and should incubate scaling solutions.

And finally,

EIP 1234, the Ethereum improvement proposal that will most likely have effects on the entire network, whether a user is a developer, miner, or speculator, they will most likely feel the effects of EIP 1234 in some way, shape, or form. EIP 1234 delays the Ethereum ice-age by 12 months and lowers the block reward from 3 ETH to 2 ETH. Out of the five EIP’s being implemented in the Constantinople hard fork, EIP 1234 is probably the most significant — a change in the block reward from 3 ETH to 2 ETH is huge.

What EIP 1234 Could Mean for the Market

A decreased block reward means that miners will be expanding the same amount of processing power and using the same amount of electricity to power their mining rigs, yet, earning a lesser supply of the reward in return. In theory, a decreased supply — ceteris paribus — should increase the value of the underlying asset. If the same amount of resources are working towards unearthing a smaller amount of something, that smaller amount should become more valuable to make up for the decreased supply. In the case of miners, they have electricity bills to pay, so to balance out the lesser reward they will be receiving from mining blocks, it would not be surprising if the cost of each Ether increased to compensate the decline in block reward.

As you can see in the graph, when demand stays constant, and the quantity supplied decreases, price increases.

But of course, that is considering all is well and that all other variables remain equal. The cryptocurrency market — like any market — is unpredictable, and any piece of information that has not yet been released or absorbed into the market price could change the future outlook. That is why it is important to always do your own research before making an investment!

Feel free to reach out to WhitePark Capital Team — for more information on the blockchain industry and cryptocurrency markets.

And be sure to check back on our blog for more updates regarding the cryptocurrency industry, and to be on the lookout for when the Constantinople hard fork finishes up on the testnet and goes live on the Ethereum mainnet!

Follow us on Twitter: @vshabanov_ @WhitePark

Disclaimer:

This article is an informational document and does not constitute an investment recommendation, investment advice, an offer to sell or a solicitation to purchase any assets or any entity organized, controlled, or managed by WhitePark Capital LLC (“WhitePark”) or any of its affiliates. This article is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations.

The views expressed in this article are the subjective views of WhitePark personnel, based on information which is believed to be reliable and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty is made, expressed or implied, with respect to the fairness, correctness, accuracy, reasonableness or completeness of the information and opinions. The information contained in this letter is current as of the date indicated above. WhitePark does not undertake to update the information contained herein.

WhitePark and its principals have made investments in some of the instruments discussed in this communication and may in the future make additional investments, including taking both long and short positions, in connection with such instruments without further notice.

It is strongly suggested that investors obtain independent advice in relation to any investment, financial, legal, tax, accounting or regulatory issues discussed herein. Analyses and opinions contained herein may be based on assumptions that, if altered, can change the analyses or opinions expressed. Nothing contained herein shall constitute any representation or warranty as to future performance of any financial instrument, credit, currency rate or other market or economic measure.

--

--

Vladislav Shabanov
WhitePark Capital

Partner @WhitePark Capital Hedge Fund focusing on Digital Asset & Blockchain Industry | RBS & MSU grad | Former Multi-Asset team member at Russell Investments.