Epistemology and Cognitive Science: Do We Know What We Know?

Jack Roebuck
Wisdom Pulse
Published in
5 min readMay 20, 2023

--

Introduction to Epistemology and Cognitive Science

Epistemology, the philosophical study of knowledge, has been a central topic in philosophy for centuries. It seeks to answer fundamental questions such as: What is knowledge? How do we acquire it? How do we know what we know? In recent years, these questions have been explored not only by philosophers but also by cognitive scientists, leading to a fascinating intersection of these two disciplines. This article delves into the recent breakthroughs in cognitive science that have profound implications for our understanding of epistemology.

The Intersection of Cognitive Science and Epistemology

Cognitive science, a multidisciplinary domain committed to the comprehensive study of the mind and its complex operations, has traditionally been perceived as separate from the realm of epistemology. However, recent academic explorations hint at a more profound interconnection between these two areas of study than what was previously understood. A pivotal research piece, “On some intracranial dogmas in epistemology,” has cast a spotlight on this confluence, instigating a reassessment of entrenched epistemological doctrines and presenting a novel perspective on the mechanism of knowledge acquisition.

This groundbreaking research not only bridges the gap between cognitive science and epistemology but also opens up new avenues for understanding the human mind and its capacity for knowledge. It brings to the fore the importance of integrating different disciplines to gain a more holistic understanding of complex concepts.

A Look at the Internalist Standpoint in Epistemology

The research undertakes a critical evaluation of the traditional ‘internalist’ standpoint in epistemology. This standpoint posits that the essence of our thoughts and the substantiation of our beliefs are solely dictated by internal factors. This perspective, a philosophical inheritance from Descartes, has been a fundamental tenet of epistemology for centuries. However, the research suggests that this internalist standpoint may not be as unassailable as it was once considered.

The study’s findings challenge the internalist viewpoint, prompting scholars and philosophers to reconsider the role of external factors in shaping our thoughts and beliefs. This shift in perspective could potentially revolutionize the field of epistemology, paving the way for more nuanced and comprehensive theories of knowledge.

The Rise of Externalism in Cognitive Science

The research highlights a significant shift in cognitive science towards ‘externalism’. This viewpoint contends that our environments significantly influence the formation of our thoughts and beliefs. Content externalists propose that our mental content is so profoundly shaped by our surroundings that two individuals in identical psychological states might not necessarily harbor identical thoughts. This viewpoint has gained such momentum that content internalism is nearly obsolete in the year 2023.

The rise of externalism underscores the dynamic nature of cognitive science and its openness to new perspectives and theories. It also highlights the importance of considering the role of environmental factors in our understanding of cognition and knowledge.

The Downfall of Cognitive Internalism

The research also delves into the decline of ‘cognitive internalism’, the doctrine that all cognitive processes are confined within the brain. This belief has been challenged by the emergence of ‘embodied cognition’, the theory that cognition is not merely a brain-based process but involves the entire body and its interaction with the environment. This theory has gained significant traction in cognitive science, suggesting that cognitive internalism may not be as steadfast a pillar of epistemology as it was once thought.

The decline of cognitive internalism and the rise of embodied cognition reflect the evolving nature of cognitive science and its willingness to question and revise its fundamental principles in light of new evidence and perspectives.

The Influence of Digital Information Storage on Epistemology

The research concludes by examining the impact of digital information storage and generation on our understanding of epistemology. With the advent of digital technology, the locus of information storage has expanded beyond our brains to external devices such as smartphones and computers. This shift has profound implications for our understanding of knowledge and cognition, challenging traditional notions of knowledge acquisition and storage.

The influence of digital technology on epistemology underscores the need for the field to adapt and evolve in response to technological advancements. It also highlights the potential for technology to reshape our understanding of knowledge and cognition in profound and unexpected ways.

Digital Knowledge: A New Frontier

The paper argues that when asking whether information stored digitally can be considered ‘knowledge’, we should feel free to ask this literally. This perspective challenges the traditional view that knowledge must be stored within our brains. It opens up the possibility that devices like smartphones could be considered extensions of our cognitive systems, storing knowledge in the same way our brains do.

Conclusion: A New Perspective on Knowledge

The intersection of cognitive science and epistemology offers a fresh perspective on knowledge. It challenges long-held beliefs and opens up new possibilities for understanding how we acquire and store knowledge. This perspective is particularly relevant in the digital age, where information is increasingly stored and accessed through digital devices. As we continue to explore this new frontier, we may need to redefine our understanding of knowledge and cognition, moving beyond the confines of our brains to encompass the digital extensions of our cognitive systems.

We hope you found this both enlightening and thought-provoking. If you enjoyed exploring this topic with us, we invite you to follow us for more engaging content.

Stay connected to receive regular updates, insightful articles, and thought leadership on a wide range of subjects. Let’s continue our journey of intellectual exploration together!

References

“On some intracranialist dogmas in epistemology”. (2023). Retrieved from dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44204–022–00045-z

--

--