Raw Milk Health Risks Grow

Bird flu spread has only made it more dangerous, scientists and nutritionists explain

The Conversation U.S.
Wise & Well

--

By Juan Silva, Professor of Food Science, Nutrition and Health Promotion, Mississippi State University; Joel Komakech, Assisstant Professor of Food Science, Nutrition and Health Promotion, Mississippi State University and Mandy Conrad, Assistant Clinical Professor in Nutrition and Dietetics, Mississippi State University

Influencers extoll the benefits of drinking raw milk over pasteurized milk, but there isn’t substantive evidence to support these claims. AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall

Despite an ongoing outbreak of bird flu in dairy cows, the popularity of raw milk has only risen. Advocates claim raw milk has superior health benefits over pasteurized milk. There is little evidence to support these claims, however, and the risk of serious illness is much greater.

Mississippi State University food scientists Juan Silva and Joel Komakech and nutritionist Mandy Conrad explain the difference between pasteurized and raw milk, addressing common misconceptions about the health risks and purported benefits of consuming unpasteurized milk. These questions are more important than ever, since cattle can shed viral material into their milk. Not only can pathogens end up in milk, but at least three farmworkers reportedly have contracted H5N1, the virus that causes avian influenza, in 2024. Farmworkers can get sick by handling infected animals or their byproducts, such as raw milk.

--

--

The Conversation U.S.
Wise & Well

An independent, nonprofit news organization dedicated to unlocking the ideas and knowledge of academic experts for the public.