The Cambridge Analytica Scandal: A Breach of Trust and Data Privacy

Ada Cloud ⛅️🤎
Women in Technology
5 min readOct 27, 2023
Image: Cambridge Analytica.

Hey guys, it is your favorite tech writer doing what she knows best

I also want to use this opportunity to inform y’all that I am officially a writer for the Women in Technology publication here on Medium. I am so excited for this new phase of my technical writing career, all thanks to Mariana Carvalho.

This topic is still all about cyber-attacks, which I explained in my last article on The FireEye SolarWinds Orion Platform Attack. The Cambridge Analytica scandal is another example of cyber-attacks and their effects on the modern cybersecurity world. I hope you enjoy this one better than the last one.

Introduction

The Cambridge Analytica affair was a watershed point in data privacy and political history. The Cambridge Analytica incident exposed the concerning problem of cyber-attacks and data analysis. It highlighted the fragility of personal data in the digital age and prompted serious worries about the impact of data-driven campaigns on elections. This incident concerned the illicit collection of data from millions of Facebook users, its misuse for political goals, and the resulting public backlash. This article dives into the scandal’s specifics, repercussions, and the lessons it tells us about data privacy in the 21st century.

This episode demonstrated the extent to which personal data can be used for political reasons, raising worries about digital privacy and security. The incident highlighted the risks of unchecked data collecting and processing. It emphasized the need for tougher legislation and protections to preserve individuals’ internet privacy. It also spurred a broader discussion about ethical data analytics practices and raised concerns about responsibility in an increasingly digitized environment.

What is Cambridge Analytica?

Cambridge Analytica is a British political consulting organization that helps companies and political parties “change audience behavior.” It promises to be able to analyze massive amounts of consumer data and combine it with behavioral science to identify people to whom businesses can market. It gathers information from a variety of sources, including social media platforms like Facebook and its own polling.

The firm, which has its headquarters in London, was founded in 2013 as a spinoff of another company named SCL Group, with funding from conservative funders such as Robert Mercer and Steve Bannon. The primary focus of the firm was data research and targeted political messaging.

Who runs Cambridge Analytica?

SCL Group owns the company and several of its directors. Nix, a 42-year-old former Etonian who joined SCL in 2003 after studying at Manchester University and working in corporate finance, is the primary player. Nix created the company’s political arm.

Last year, he informed Techcrunch about his plans to write a book about the company, tentatively titled “Mad Men to maths men.” Mark Turnbull, the managing director of Cambridge Analytica’s political division, spent 18 years with the communications firm Bell Pottinger before joining SCL.

The controversy spurred government inquiries into Facebook’s privacy practices, as well as lawsuits and a high-profile congressional hearing in the United States. Facebook believes up to 87 million people’s data was unlawfully shared with the political consulting firm. In 2019, Facebook agreed to pay $5 billion to settle an FTC investigation into its privacy practices.

Cambridge Analytica declared bankruptcy and has refused to resolve the FTC’s charges. In addition, the corporation was involved in an undercover sting operation in which senior officials were caught bragging about psychological manipulation, entrapment techniques, and fake news operations.

Factors impacted by the scandal.

These are the factors that were influenced by the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

  • Data Harvesting: The crisis broke when it was found that Cambridge Analytica had obtained the data of around 87 million Facebook users without their express permission. This information was gathered via a personality quiz app developed by a researcher named Aleksandr Kogan. Users who took the survey unintentionally gave access to not only their own data but also the data of their Facebook friends. Personal information, likes, and even private messages were included in the data. This information was then utilized to produce tailored political advertisements in order to influence voter behavior during elections.
  • Influence in politics: Cambridge Analytica has been accused of utilizing this information to generate extensive psychographic profiles of its users. These profiles were used to personalize political messages and adverts, particularly during the 2016 presidential election in the United States and the Brexit campaign in the United Kingdom. The idea was to sway voters’ opinions by providing highly tailored content based on their psychological profiles. In response to this controversy, there have been calls for digital businesses to be more transparent about their data-handling policies. Governments all across the world have also made steps to enhance privacy laws and set harsher punishments on individuals who misuse personal data.
  • Impact on Democracy: The controversy shined light on the potential for data analytics and micro-targeting to be used to manipulate political processes. It sparked severe worries about social media platforms’ influence on public opinion and elections. The exploitation of personal information for political purposes jeopardized the norms of fair and transparent elections. Consequences: As the scandal developed, it had far-reaching ramifications. Facebook experienced widespread public criticism for insufficient data security procedures, and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, was summoned to testify before Congress. Global regulatory authorities began scrutinizing data privacy rules and tech titans, resulting in the establishment of the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and requests for tighter data protection measures in the United States.

Lessons Learned

The Cambridge Analytica incident is a sharp reminder of the need for personal data security in an increasingly digital society. It has raised awareness of the importance of strong data protection rules and responsible data usage. Users have become more careful about their online actions, and tech corporations have come under increased scrutiny for failing to protect user data.

The Cambridge Analytica crisis should serve as a wake-up message to individuals, businesses, and policymakers alike. It emphasizes the significance of protecting personal information in an age when cyber-attacks are getting more sophisticated and common.

Conclusion

The Cambridge Analytica scandal exposed the possibility of personal data exploitation and manipulation for political reasons, emphasizing the importance of strict data protection procedures.

It revealed our digital age’s weaknesses as well as the critical necessity to balance the power of data analytics with ethical and legal issues.

The lessons learned from this disaster continue to affect data privacy discussions, influencing policies and practices around the world.

--

--