Is Educational reform necessary for minimizing socioeconomic equality? — Mind the gap!
To achieve academically and professionally, whatever the individual’s socioeconomic background is, everyone should have equal chances, which is what social mobility refers to. Since education boosts earnings more for people at the bottom of the income range than for those further up, many believe that upward social mobility is made possible through education, which also helps people escape poverty (Bloome, Dyer and Zhou, 2018). A good education has considerable power to increase equality between women and men. Women’s lower levels of political influence, bodily autonomy, and impoverishment may all be addressed via education. It enhances the well-being of mothers and their offspring. Women’s salaries tend to be closer to men’s when they have more education. The more learned females appear to be, the more control they appear to possess over their lifestyles, essentially once they start a family and have a certain number of children (Global Education Monitoring Report Team, 2014). Providing girls and boys with a high-quality education may help them realize their equality and overcome ingrained societal views. Undoubtedly, the educational system is necessary for our generation worldwide. This paper will discuss whether the educational system should be reformed to minimize socioeconomic inequality.
A successful education system is essential to promoting tolerance and more peaceful communities because it helps eliminate disparities and achieve socioeconomic equality. However, the current policy may not work effectively since the gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students regarding access to resources and facilities that support learning has remained the same. Not only by expanding children’s knowledge but also in their daily lives. It is interesting to investigate whether the educational system should remain unchanged or undergo reform. Should financing per pupil be uniform across all schools? After all, it is an equality issue. Nevertheless, should pupils from lower socioeconomic backgrounds get extra help to help them close the gap? Again, that is an equity-related issue.
An essential objective is to guarantee that all pupils have equitable opportunities. However, the fact that certain pupils need extra time to get there still stands. Again, equity has a role to play in this situation. More and more of these resources are required for the children who are lagging behind the most, who are typically low-income and underrepresented minorities, in order for them to gain ground, thrive, and ultimately bridge the education gap (Bloome, Dyer and Zhou, 2018). More than providing children who arrive at school struggling academically due to issues beyond an institution’s power with the equivalent resources as pupils in higher-income institutions will be needed to narrow the disparity. We shall continue to close that gap, but only if we guarantee that low-income children and underrepresented minorities have access to outstanding instructors and that their institutions have the resources to give them the sort of high-quality schooling they require to excel.
Additionally, if everyone received the same advantages, nobody would gain. Therefore, instead of concentrating on the process and ensuring that it is equitable, we should concentrate on the outcomes and improve equity for everybody (Calahan et al., 2021). The educational equity perspective reframes the policy conversation to focus on ensuring that school systems support the academic success of all children, even if it necessitates “uneven” resource allocation. Any education reform should emphasize equal education, but there is still more to do. On a national scale, it might not be conceivable constitutionally. However, state agencies, educators, and lawmakers could consider developing regulations that provide excellent education while guaranteeing that children can realize their particular potential.
Let us talk about the educational system in America. The government now pays little attention to the educational system for lower-income households. Administrations throughout numerous developing nations struggle to provide for the educational demands of their populations due to a complete lack of legislative willpower or financial ability (Carlson, Wimer and Haskins, 2022). Disadvantaged parents have arranged and funded their kids’ education in certain low-income nations. However, many parents struggle to pay for their children’s educational expenses and other usage fees. Due to their lower educational attainment, children from underprivileged backgrounds always have fewer opportunities to perpetuate social disparities. Compared to higher classes or prestigious schools, skilled teachers have fewer opportunities to teach in institutions with sizable populations of pupils from disadvantaged or low-income households (Hammond, 2010). The current educational system is not sustainable; not only does it not satisfy the education system’s main purpose — helping people escape poverty — but it also worsens society’s problems.
Getting a college education is a key to a better life in America. College graduates are indeed far more likely to advance economically. The National Center for Education Statistics study, conducted from 2002 to 2012, focused on high school students from their sophomore year to the end of four college years. Over ten years, 61% of students in the highest income quartile obtained a four-year degree. Instead, the students from the lowest socioeconomic quartile who obtained a bachelor’s degree were 14.5%, and an additional 8.2% obtained an associate’s degree (Kelly, 2016). As a result of having parents with the lowest educational levels and wealth, kids in the bottom quartile were more inclined to have professions that required little or no ability.
Conversely, the parents of individuals in the top quartile were far more inclined to be administrators or professionals with higher incomes and educational qualifications (Dynarski, 2015). In other words, our college education system encourages and contributes to social mobility, but this only works for the relatively tiny percentage of Americans from low-income families who complete and graduate. This also brings up the fact that students will drop out at a lower academic difficulty threshold if they believe there is a reduced advantage to continuing their education (Mubarak, Cao and Zhang, 2020). Although they know that a pay advantage is associated with finishing high school or college, their family income disparity has a negative impact that balances out the expected reduction in dropout rates.
Inequality can be observed in the concentration of lower-income pupils in high-minority schools. Lower-income pupils are concentrated in schools that are poorly resourced. Because of the history of anti-black racism in the United States, socioeconomic class disadvantage and race are correlated. 2016 saw a 10% fall in the number of white pupils attending public schools in the main metropolises of the USA. These suburban pupils included 27% Latino students and around 7% black students. Considerable segregation existed inside the suburbs, with Latino and African American pupils often enrolling in institutions where the non-white student population was about three-fourths of the total. When white children attended, they frequently made up two-thirds of the enrollment in all major suburban schools (Frankenberg et al., 2019).
The gap between majority and minority students access to educational opportunities has been expanding as the need for knowledge and ability increases. The lower-class families lack the opportunity that the middle class has to rise to the upper class. Based on their social position, pupils frequently acquire learning opportunities that are drastically different. Compared to upper-class families, lower-class families always have fewer and lower-quality curricula, learning materials, access to laboratories and computers, significantly larger class sizes, less experienced and qualified teachers, and less access to hands-on experience, policies related to school funding, resource allocations, and tracks have a negative impact (Miller, 2018). These represented how the class impacts how likely someone is to be admitted into a specific type of school, how successful they are, what types of employment they may access, and what sorts of relationships they can create.
Social mobility may be lessened in more unequal nations where educational scores are, on average, lower (Heckman and Landersø, 2021). The absence of adequate resources and programs for our kids, communities, and future constitutes a missed opportunity. Whereas students in the U.S. are often tracked by income, other regions of the world may similarly disadvantage poor children while deprioritizing all girls, regardless of socioeconomic class. Girls’ education facilitates economic growth and inequality reduction. It helps create more robust and stable societies, enabling everyone, including boys and men, to reach their full potential. However, there need to be more girls in the educational system. In Pakistan, employed women with higher education levels made 95% more than those with low literacy or no education, but males only had a 33% pay gap. Women with higher education are better equipped to play a bigger role in the economic development of their community and family. They are more likely to contribute 90% of their income to their households (Global Education Monitoring Report Team, 2014).
According to recent United Nations Children’s Fund research, over one in three teenage girls in the world’s poorest households have never attended school (UNICEF, 2020). Access to school is more challenging for women and girls. They encounter many difficulties in schooling brought on by cultural traditions, poverty, and inadequate infrastructure. Gender parity in elementary education has not been attained in around one-third of developing nations. Due to these educational disadvantages, young women have fewer opportunities to acquire skills and find employment. Also, we will likely observe a spike in dropout rates when young females get pregnant or marry since schools will be closed throughout the epidemic and in areas where teenage pregnancies are stigmatized. Due to increased family workloads due to the closure of schools, females may spend more time helping out at home rather than in class. It might persuade parents to keep their daughters at home even when schools resume, particularly those with a lower emphasis on girls’ education. Additionally, the study demonstrates that when the girls’ families miss a family caregiver, girls run the danger of dropping out of school since they frequently must, in part, take up the labour that was done by the previous caregiver, who could be away due to illness or death (Burzynska & Gabriela, 2020). As a result, we could observe more female than male household helpers, a decline in academic performance, and higher school dropout rates with the present COVID-19 epidemic.
Let us take a step back and observe the issue by looking around the world. Some nations, such as Sub-Saharan Africa, cannot even supply basic educational resources to schools (UNICEF, 2020). The situation is particularly terrible at the basic and lower secondary levels because fewer than half of the schools have access to power, running water, and the Internet. As a result, schools fail to provide their kids with a quality education, which is exacerbated by the lack of resources accessible to the poorest children. If the gap between nations with low levels of digitalization and those with high levels of connectivity is wide, inequality will likewise worsen. UNICEF Executive Director Henrietta Fore “As long as public education spending is disproportionately skewed towards children from the richest households, the poorest will have little hope of escaping poverty, learning the skills they need to compete and succeed in today’s world, and contributing to their countries’ economies.” (Imchen & Francis, 2020). The biggest funding gaps in education are found in ten African nations, with the richest pupils receiving four times as much money as the poorest. There are still nations included in the research where their spending on education is evenly distributed between the richest and lowest quintiles, including Barbados, Denmark, Ireland, Norway, and Sweden. The governments of the aforementioned countries heavily fund their respective education sectors, resulting in higher social mobility and greater inequality.
Governments must focus substantial attention and resources on addressing the systemic educational disparities that have been brought to light and made worse. The true epidemic is the socioeconomic problem: inequality. The ongoing underinvestment in public education is one of the policies that governments should change. Every child has the right to an education, a privilege that so many kids today have not been allowed to exercise fully. All governments should now rise to the occasion and provide improved educational frameworks that open doors for every child (Bloome, Dyer and Zhou, 2018).
Every government’s recovery strategy should focus on education, focusing on pre-existing issues and the pandemic’s effects on children’s education. In addition, governments should safeguard and prioritize financing for public education in general and reevaluate the low priority — and chronic underfunding — accorded to delivering education under emergencies in light of the significant financial strains the epidemic has placed on national economies (Carlson, Wimer and Haskins, 2022). It will be complex to remove the constraints on children’s entitlement to an education that were brought to light before or by the pandemic. However, all governments, international organizations, and donors who support them should be steadfast in their pledges. Their top priorities will be allocating and properly allocating more resources to strengthen public inclusive education systems, as well as swiftly eliminating discriminatory policies and practices that contribute to eliminating disparities and attaining socioeconomic equality.
Reference:
Bloome, D., Dyer, S. and Zhou, X. (2018). Educational Inequality, Educational Expansion, and Intergenerational Income Persistence in the United States. American Sociological Review, 83(6), pp.1215–1253. doi:10.1177/0003122418809374.
Burzynska, Katarzyna, and Gabriela Contreras. “Gendered effects of school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Lancet (London, England) vol. 395,10242 (2020): 1968. doi:10.1016/S0140- 6736(20)31377–5
Cahalan, M.W., Addison, M., Brunt, N., Patel, P.R. and Perna, L.W., 2021. Indicators of Higher Education Equity in the United States: 2021 Historical Trend Report. Pell institute for the study of
Carlson, M.J., Wimer, C. and Haskins, R. (2022). Changing Work, Changing Families, and Public Policies Toward Low-Income Families. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 8(5), pp.1–22. doi:10.7758/rsf.2022.8.5.01.
Dynarski, S. (2015). For the Poor, the Graduation Gap Is Even Wider Than the Enrollment Gap. The New York Times. [online] 2 Jun. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/02/upshot/for-the- poor-the-graduation-gap-is-even-wider-than-the-enrollment-gap.html [Accessed 25 Nov. 2022]
Frankenberg, E., Ee, J., Ayscue, J.B. and Orfield, G., 2019. Harming our common future: America’s segregated schools 65 years after Brown. www. civilrightsproject. ucla. edu, (research). https://escholarship.org/content/qt23j1b9nv/qt23j1b9nv.pdf
Global Education Monitoring Report Team (2014). Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all | Global Education Monitoring Report. [online] en.unesco.org. Available at: https://en.unesco.org/gem- report/report/2014/teaching-and-learning-achieving-quality-all.
Hammond, Linda Darling-. Inequality in Teaching and Schooling: How Opportunity … — NCBI Bookshelf. 2010, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK223640/.
Heckman, J. and Landersø, R. (2021). Lessons for Americans from Denmark about Inequality and Social Mobility. Labour Economics, 77, p.101999. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2021.101999.
Kelly, Andrew P. “Does College Really Improve Social Mobility?” Brookings, Brookings, 29 July 2016, www.brookings.edu/blog/social-mobility-memos/2014/02/11/does-college-really-improve- social-mobility/.
Mubarak, A.A., Cao, H. and Zhang, W. (2020). Prediction of students’ early dropout based on their interaction logs in online learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, pp.1–20. doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1727529.
Ochoa, Dolores. “Pandemic’s Dire Global Impact on Education.” Human Rights Watch, 19 Oct. 2021, https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/05/17/pandemics-dire-global-impact-education.
Imchen, Achila, and Francis Ndem . “Addressing the Learning Crisis.” UNICEF, 1 Jan. 2020, www.unicef.org/reports/addressing-learning-crisis-2020.
Schofield, J.W. (1991). School desegregation and intergroup relations. In G.Grant, editor. (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 17, pp.335–409. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
UNICEF (2020). 1 in 3 adolescent girls from the poorest households has never been to school. [online] www.unicef.org. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/1-3-adolescent-girls-poorest- households-has-never-been-school.
