Scores Over Souls: Rethinking the South Korean Education System

On July 23, 1953, the guns of the Korean War fell silent, marking the end of a conflict that had devastated the Korean Peninsula. The war had severely damaged key industries, leaving the nation struggling with mass poverty and economic instability. During turbulent times, a fervent belief took root: that academic excellence was the key to individual and national prosperity. This belief led to a rigorous academic system, fundamentally geared towards equipping skills to thrive in a rapidly industrialising economy. This shift in focus played a pivotal role in what was later termed “The Miracle of the Han River,” a remarkable economic transformation that saw South Korea’s GDP soar from $79 in 1960 to over $5,000 by 1989 (Ha and Lee). Yet, decades later, this same education system, borne out of a collective fear of economic insecurity, now casts a shadow over the very society it was meant to uplift. Today, South Korea’s education system is characterised by a hypercompetitive, score-based ethos that disproportionately favours the economically privileged. This educational arms race not only deepens societal divisions but also limits the intrinsic motivation of students, turning the pursuit of knowledge into a unrelenting chase for grades and prestige.

While South Korea’s rigorous education system has been praised for contributing to the nation’s remarkable economic growth, a critical reassessment reveals that this system may be more detrimental than beneficial in the contemporary context. The focus on academic achievement has led to unintended consequences that now challenge the very fabric of South Korean society. This argument, though potentially controversial in a culture that deeply values educational rigour, invites a necessary dialogue about redefining success and prosperity in an evolving global landscape.

Underneath the facade of academic success in South Korea’s education system lies a troubling reality: the severe impact on student well-being. Research consistently reveals how this high-pressure system leads to a broad range of mental and physical health issues among adolescents. Studies indicate alarmingly high levels of stress, anxiety, and depression, which are directly linked to the intense academic demands and competition prevalent in South Korean schools (Mani). Adolescent Koreans recorded the world’s lowest levels of happiness and satisfaction with their lives (Cho). The long hours devoted to study and private tutoring, often extending past midnight even on weekends, worsen these problems, leading to a state of chronic fatigue and mental exhaustion among students. The Korean Youth Health and Behaviour Survey, for example, reported a disheartening data trend, showing an increasing level of depression among adolescents (12–17- year-olds) from 10 per cent in 2005 to 25.2 per cent in 2020 (Kim).

Furthermore, as shown in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) report on Korean students, the data starkly contrasts the outstanding academic performance between Korean students and their overseas peers (ranking among the top in mathematics, science, and reading) with the extremely low levels of ‘student engagement, motivation, self-belief and enjoyment of learning’ (OECD). This dynamic contributes to the popularity of traditionally ‘stable’ professions like medicine, law, and engineering, but at the cost of diminishing students’ autonomy and their ability to explore and develop their own unique interests and passions.

This discrepancy highlights a critical issue: the education system, while successful in producing high-achieving students, often does so at the expense of their mental well-being and intrinsic interest in learning. Serious concerns about the long-term sustainability of such a system and its true cost to the health and happiness of the nation’s youth need to be raised. The impact of South Korea’s education system on student well-being is only the tip of the iceberg. Beyond the individual level, this system plays an instrumental role in shaping the broader societal landscape, particularly in terms of social equality.

The South Korean education system, designed to foster academic excellence, inadvertently magnifies social inequalities, creating a divide that is deeply rooted in economic status. One of the most defining aspects of the Korean education system is the ‘shadow education system’, which refers to informal private tutoring supplementing formal schooling. In a recent study, a remarkable 83% of 704 parents surveyed were found to be already investing in private education for their five- year-old children (Bak). In addition, Korean parents pour approximately $17 billion into private tutoring annually (Kim). This educational system is one where the scales of opportunity are tipped in favour of those who can afford the luxury of extensive private tutoring. Given the weight of these private tutoring practices, South Koreans from wealthier families find advantage. As a result, the existing socio-economic hierarchies become further entrenched. The capacity to afford private education is directly associated with students’ performance in school as well as elite university admissions. The Korean Educational Longitudinal Survey has found that private tutoring significantly improves students’ academic achievement in secondary schools, particularly in subjects crucial for university admissions such as English and math. The same study found that students who received private tutoring had significantly better performance in university entrance examinations compared to those who did not receive such tutoring (Lee). This creates a vicious circle, wherein a higher economic status generates educational status, and vice versa. In turn, education — like many other commodities — once again becomes a luxury accessible to the rich. This situation thereby stresses the impact that economic disparities have not only on educational achievements but also on the broader social and economic fabric of South Korea, linking academic inequalities to deeper societal divisions.

South Korea’s education system influences not just academic and career trajectories but also broader socio-economic mobility, perpetuating deep-seated inequalities. The pursuit of higher education illustrates stark disparities, with only 2% of high school graduates securing spots at the elite SKY universities — Seoul National University, Korea University, and Yonsei University (Kwon). Wealthier districts such as Seocho and Gangnam disproportionately represent these admissions, pointing to a significant socio-economic divide in educational opportunities (Byun). This imbalance extends beyond university walls into the workforce, where SKY graduates hold a majority of influential positions: 53% of National Assembly lawmakers, 71% of minister-level posts, and significant majorities in leadership across CEOs, legal professions, and hospital directorships (Byun). This concentration of opportunities among a small, economically privileged segment of the population underscores a systemic flaw: education and professional institutions are closely intertwined, perpetuating a cycle of socio-economic inequality. A survey by the Korean Educational Development Institute reveals that 41.7% of students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds perceive a bias against them in society, further indicating that the repercussions of this educational divide are felt long after graduation, affecting career prospects and social mobility (Lee). This creates not just a hypercompetitive academic environment but also a professional landscape where success is often pre-determined by a birth lottery.

The implications of South Korea’s rigid educational framework extend beyond its immediate social and economic context, raising concerns about its impact on innovation and entrepreneurship, as well as limiting students’ autonomy, independence, and individuality. For instance, the emphasis on high-stakes standardised testing and the heavy load of rote memorisation often leaves little room for creative thinking or problem-solving exercises in the classroom. As a result, students may excel in replicating information but struggle with generating original ideas and innovative solutions. This environment encourages students to avoid failure at all costs rather than pursue personal interests, leading to a focus on securing stable employment rather than cultivating genuine passion. Reports such as the Programme for International Student Assessment have noted that Korean students exhibit low engagement and personal connection with their studies, primarily viewing education as a pathway to better career prospects (PISA). Ultimately, this approach to education limits students’ independence and individuality by prioritising economic stability over the exploration of personal passions.

In stark contrast, examining educational systems in countries like Finland and Singapore reveals a more holistic approach that nurtures innovation. Finland, for instance, has consistently ranked high in global education indices, not for its rigorous memorisation or standardised testing, but for its focus on creativity, problem-solving, and student well-being (Colagrossi). The Finnish model emphasises teacher autonomy, less homework, and minimal standardised testing, which fosters an environment where innovative thinking can thrive. Similarly, the Singapore, known for its high standards in academics, has implemented programs that encourage experiential learning, critical thinking, and innovation, moving away from traditional learning methods (Kwek). These contrasting approaches highlight the potential benefits of a more balanced educational system that supports not just academic excellence, but also the development of a diverse range of skills crucial for the modern world. South Korea’s focus on traditional academic achievement, while commendable, may need to evolve to embrace these more rounded educational philosophies to foster the next generation of innovators and entrepreneurs.

To effectively address the deficiencies in South Korea’s education system while maintaining its enviable academic outcomes, thoughtful reforms must be pursued. The challenge lies not in diminishing the nation’s competitive edge but in reshaping it to better foster innovation, which is increasingly recognised as essential for sustained economic prosperity. A crucial step could involve dismantling the ‘feeder’ system, where only graduates from top universities are funneled into premier jobs. By encouraging top companies to recruit from a broader array of educational institutions, this would not only democratise opportunities but also stimulate a diverse range of creative ideas and entrepreneurial ventures. Moreover, expanding access to these elite universities can help mitigate the severe pressure on students, who currently endure extreme competition to secure a place in a few prestigious schools. This could help alleviate widespread mental health issues while maintaining high educational standards. Competitiveness should be about pioneering ideas and leading innovation, not just excelling in standardised exams. This transformation requires a cultural shift towards valuing intrinsic motivation — where students are driven by curiosity and the joy of learning, rather than external rewards. Such a change would likely reduce the toxicity in the educational environment, making it healthier and more supportive of mental well-being. While these shifts may face resistance due to deeply ingrained cultural values that equate academic success with personal worth, the effort to move towards a less toxic and more inclusive educational system is crucial for societal well-being. By doing so, South Korea can uphold its academic excellence while nurturing the innovative and entrepreneurial qualities needed for today’s economic challenges, enhancing student autonomy and individuality.

In the wake of the Korean War’s devastation, South Korea’s rigorous education system emerged as a cornerstone of the nation’s remarkable transformation, catalysing economic growth and fostering academic excellence. Yet, this system, once a beacon of national resurgence, now casts shadows over its societal fabric, perpetuating societal inequalities and harming the well-being of its youth. The relentless pursuit of academic success, driven by a hypercompetitive culture, not only deepens social divides but also stifles genuine intellectual curiosity and personal growth. This focus on quantifiable achievements has led to unintended consequences, eroding the intrinsic motivation essential for holistic development and creating a chasm between the economically privileged and the less affluent.

This critical juncture calls for a profound reassessment of educational values and goals. South Korea must reenvision its educational framework to embrace a more balanced approach that fosters creativity, critical thinking, and well-being alongside academic rigoir. By learning from international models such as Finland and Singapore, which emphasise student autonomy and innovative learning environments, South Korea can cultivate a generation of learners equipped to navigate and shape a rapidly changing global landscape. This shift requires not only policy changes but also a cultural transformation that values diverse talents and individual passions, aligning education with the broader needs of society and the economy. Ultimately, redefining educational success in South Korea is not merely an academic endeavor but a societal imperative, pivotal to the nation’s future prosperity and the well-being of its citizens. As South Korea stands at this crossroads, the path it chooses will determine not just the future of its youth but the very character and resilience of the nation in the years to come.

Works Cited

Bak, Se-Hwan “83 percent of five-year-olds in Korea go to hagwon,” Korea Herald, January 9,

2017, http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20170109000747
Byun SY, Kim KK, Park H. School Choice and Educational Inequality in South Korea. J Sch

Choice. 2012 Jan 1;6(2):158–183.

Cho, Il-Jun. Survey Finds South Korean Youth among the Unhappiest in the World, Hankyoreh, english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_international/782260.html.

Colagrossi, Mike, World Economic Forum. “10 Reasons Why Finland’s Education System Is the Best in the World.” World Economic Forum, 2018, www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/09/10- reasons-why-finlands-education-system-is-the-best-in-the-world/.

Howe, Brendan, “South Korea: Transformative Challenges to the Economic and Political “Miracle on the Han River,” Asian Affairs:An American Review 47 (2019): 18. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00927678.2019.1704469

Kim, Yoonjung, Data Resource Profile: The Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey (KYRBS), International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 45, Issue 4, August 2016, Pages 1076–1076e, https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw070

Kwek, Dennis, “Singapore’s Educational Reforms Toward Holistic Outcomes.” Brookings, Brookings Institution, www.brookings.edu/articles/singapores-educational-reforms-toward- holistic-outcomes/.

Kwon, Suh-Kyeong, Lee, Moon-Bok, and Shin, Dong-Kwang, “Educational assessment in the Republic of Korea: lights and shadows of high-stake exam-based education system,” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 25, (2017): 4. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/0969594X.2015.1074540

Lee, Jeong-Kyu “Educational Fever and South Korean Higher Education,” REDIE 8, August 18, 2006, scielo.phpscript=sci_arttext&pid=S1607–40412006000100002

Mani, Deepti “Education in South Korea,” World Education News and Reviews, October 16, 2018, https://wenr.wes.org/2018/10/education-in-south-korea

OECD (2014), Lessons from PISA for Korea, Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190672-en .

Park, Chan-Ho, “The College Scholastic Ability Test in Korea: Introduction and Related Issues,” Kaera Research Forum 1, (2014): 37. http://www.columbia.edu/~ld208/ KAERA_2014.pdf#page=37

Wei, Wei Zhang & Yamato, Yoko, “Shadow education in East Asia: Entrenched but evolving private supplementary tutoring,” (2018).