How might a wave function actually work?

Imagine an array of virtual micro black holes that constantly collapse and evaporate, averaging to zero when measured. Now imagine that all of these virtual black holes carry a non-zero observable offset (when you look at them, you might see something other than zero). They are virtual until you look at them. When you do, you might see something other than zero, thus claiming to have seen a particle localized in space-time. In this way, the array is like a storrage array with many redundant copies of information that reveals itself in a unique pattern.

In this sense, the entire array of fluctuating virtual micro black holes carry some redundant copy of that “particle” in the sense that, for each member there is an evolving probability matrix that a non-zero offset will be observed at a given step (time) of it’s evolution. As this dynamically occurs, absent an “observation,” all of the members of the array are interacting. All that matters is where and when this “at rest” energy offset (rest mass) might be “observed,” and/or where and when a zero average energy state would otherwise result (supposedly empty space). This distinction is what distinguishes localized particles from the correlated coupling of a non-local entity. Localization and non-localization are fundamentally married to the act of observation.

But so far, our array & single particle leaves out the ability for there to be an observation. Without an observer, all you have is an evolving probability matrix for a lonely particle A, unable to observe itself whenever it expresses a non-zero existence or potential. If you then overlap this with another probability matrix, call it particle B, we can now claim to have “observation” in so far as there is the potential for two non-zero “existences” to interfere or coincide. Once this occurs, the probability matrices become coupled to each other, one affecting the other. The two individual probability matrices are then destroyed as their wave functions collapse. Depending on the type of interaction that occurs during this collapse, you might then end up with a -1 less observer waiting to be observed again.

Thus, any measurement that occurs should imply the destruction of at least two wave functions, that of the observer and that of particle being observed. In essence, there should always be at least two observers. Photons for example, are only ever observed once. This is why they are massless and travel at a universally constant speed. If they were to observe something, they would experience the passage of time. However, they do at least observe the changing curvature & lengths of space-time as they lens and redshift. This raises the question whether a photon that travels through curved spacetime is a really a single particle and/or a wave series of individual interactions spread out over spacetime as a wave function. The answer to this depends on how you define “observation.”

Also, it must be the case that, for some reason, our two original unobserved probability matrices evolve in such way so that their evolution gives rise to the observation or perception of a space-time curvature we call gravity (a long distance attraction). Meaning, the two probability matrices that would never coincide (with the exception of gravity wave energy loss), in a closed space, would need to evolve in such way that follows a curvature of space-time formed by their mutual presence & evolutions, perceived as two individual non-zero probability momentum. Otherwise, they would inevitably collide & collapse their wave functions down to a single/lower indistinguishable (and -1 less observable) energy state.