xxxxxxxx <xxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
Perfect description of the protocol.
Thank you.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 9:27 PM, xxx@xxx wrote:
In article <CACMCW-PHGXRjqck3mzvs7EsBYxZ=VT_p29xSPMdBE5hRSHq45w@mail.gmail.com> you write:>1. PoW can be good to fight against SPAM/DOS attacks where you distribute>the load to the…
2018–03–02 18:32 GMT+03:00 xxx@xxx:
If you think about PSMTP again, try to imagine the new environment of thenear future rather than the present and the past. You may think about theimpact of Cryptocurrency, end-point TEE, DANE etc. on…
First, your mail has gone to my spam box at Gmail, which funnily shows we must do better anti-spam. Well, PSMTP does not suffer false positive.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:27 AM, xxx@xxx> wrote:
2018–02–27 22:53 GMT+03:00 xxxx xxxx<xxxx@xxx.xxx>[1]:
First thing’s first. Thank you for your time. I appreciate it.
Let me answer your questions in an order providing a train of thought.
I received some remarks and challenges to my proposal for PSMTP. Some through the mail list, some in private. I researched the anti-spam state-of-the-art on the web. I checked patents, implementations, services, products, techniques, etc.
2018–01–28 22:45 GMT+03:00 Ersin Taskin wrote:
Pow, pos, dpos, etc. all have the same problem when it comes to security. When you are in the ocean, you cannot anchor to something made of or convertible to water. If you anchor to an iceberg, the…
2018–01–10 13:14 GMT+03:00 Ersin Taskin :
Dear Fransisco,
I am working on a paper proposing a new protocol to Bitcoin. That answers your question in more detail. I will share with you…
2018–01–05 14:14 GMT+03:00 Ersin Taskin :
Reversibility is a requirement which cannot be denied in systems addressing real-world scenarios as Henry Baker beautifully explains in a recent…
2018–01–03 18:57 GMT+03:00 Ersin Taskin :
Dear Phillip and Ismail,
I agree with you on trust and Bitcoin. I want to add that the trust anathema is one of the key issues of the…