Social Emotional Learning for Social Justice

Pierce Delahunt
Apr 17, 2019 · 19 min read

Every act we perform today must reflect the the kind of human relationships we are fighting to establish tomorrow.
- David Dellinger

Bullying is not a rite of passage. Empathy is a rite of passage.
- David A Levine

You do not have to work for justice. You get to.
- Pierce Delahunt

The below video is the 20-minute version of the talk I most often give at schools. The text and slides below go into more detail. Graphics by Leen Marie.

Why Am I Writing This?

My background before becoming a more explicit activist-educator is in . I pull mostly from nonviolent communication (NVC), but utilize other practices as well. While each practice has critiques, my biggest issue with the field as a whole is its individualist focus.

Individual relationships are important. They are what make community, and life itself. At the same time, this focus is extremely limiting for us folk interested in systems change. And society does not even integrate a strong understanding of individualist SEL. I look at a lot of what I do as working at the union of social emotional learning and activism/social justice.

Individual Abuse → Systemic Oppression

Most of us will recognize that an angry person screaming at a scared person on the street is an. I know there are complications to this. (Are we catching the abused person finally standing up for themselves? Perhaps…) Still, mainstream, individualist SEL gives us tools to help resolve individual conflict, even in the face of abuse. What is much less clear is what SEL says to do about systemic oppression. Toward that end, we must first understand how systemic oppression operates.

In this illustration, Community A enjoys happy, fulfilling relationships with each other. They never get into conflict. All their strategies to meet all their needs support each other, and Concretely, they are able to pay for the needs they must buy, like housing, food, healthcare, education, and comforts. In their gated communities, they find connection, intimacy, play, joy, fulfilling sense of purpose from work, and loving relationships with their families that they provide for. At their loving community gatherings, they talk about the less fortunate, and they feel good about talking about it. It meets their need for care.

These may include wealth, natural materials, labor, emotional energy, their own physical bodies, and more. Under systemic oppression, it is an enforcer group, Community C, that steals these resources to the benefit of Community A. In this very clear-cut and exaggerated illustration, we can see how this relationship violates the principles of social emotional learning. I often teach this workshop at schools. Using a less loaded example from that environment, we could call Community A (privileged group) the popular students, Community B (oppressed group) the bullied students, and Community C (enforcer group) the bulliers.

Importantly, while the above slide is three separate circles, the reality is that these oppressions exist as Venn diagrams, and are all happening at once. Any one person occupies multiple identities, and experiences multiple oppressions and/or privileges at the same time. This is a representation of

White Supremacist Oppression Examples

Privileged (A), Oppressed (B), Enforcers (C)
US/“Western” Nations, Imperialized, Military
Upper Class, Poor & Working Class, Gov & Ruling Class
White Folk, Folk of Color, Law Enforcement
Males, Female/Gender NonConforming Folk, Sexual Assaulters
Humans, NonHuman Animals, Animal Agriculture
Humans, NonHuman Life, Resource Extractors/Capitalists
Popular Students, Bullied Students, Bulliers

Four D’s of Disconnection: Narratives

Let’s talk about needs. In NVC, , by asking whether the goal in question is universal. Because everyone needs some degree of independence, efficacy, and leisure, those are considered needs. A car is a popular vehicle (ha!) to meet those needs, but not everyone needs a car, and thus a car is considered a strategy. It should be noted that

How do oppressions perpetuate? Again, we can pull from the lessons of individualist SEL. NVC’s offer a template. They organize the ways that we disconnect from the needs and feelings of ourselves or others.

Deny

Most simply, I can that the unmet needs exist in the first place. Whether from plain ignorance or something more willful, I might deny the needs are not being met, or that they exist at all. We often do this to ourselves as an effort to plow through hardship in the name of productivity, I do not need to rest. This is internalized capitalism. When we deny the unmet needs of others, just as we sometimes gaslight ourselves. Systemically, this is simply Racism ended with the Civil Rights Act. You have your equality now.

Diagnose

Similarly, we disconnect from our own or each others’ needs when we are focused on the situation. It is important to note that diagnoses can help connect us to our needs and feelings. Even just naming the needs and feelings is a diagnosis. At the same time, You just feel sad from your unmet need for purpose. You will notice the word “just” come up often in diagnoses. They also often support a gaslight: You just feel that way because of your attachment history. Your need is not a truth grounded in this moment. The problem is in you.

On a systemic level, diagnostic narratives include If, for example, the person were genuinely concerned with Black-on-Black crime, or at least curious with how it fits into White supremacy, there could be whole conversations about histories of individualized survival strategies at the expense of collective liberation, and how to support oppressed communities’ efforts toward survival strategies that empower each other.

Demand

A is a request with conditional threat or punishment. The distinction is in the freedom of the person to decline. If I insult someone after they decline my asking them out on a date, my “ask” was actually a demand. (independence, safety, or others) (connection, validation, pleasure, or others). Importantly, a sincere request may still be heard as a demand, in which case that disconnect also needs to be resolved for more harmony. This entails either getting more honest with myself that I really was using a threat, or better communicating to others that they really may decline without punishment, or both. This can be especially hard if I am recovering from a history of making demands. And of course, we can also make demands of ourselves. Systemically,

Deserve

Finally, by focusing on a system of reward and punishment, I am now asking what we , rather than remaining connected to whether we even need those things. On a personal level, I may experience a sense of inadequacy and think that I deserve shame, or the reverse: a sense of entitlement to the rewards or luxuries I think are owed to me. Instead, we focus on the future rewards/punishments or the past behaviors that triggered them. Again: Thus disconnected from needs, I may not ask whether it is even possible to deserve stripping away my joy, or whether I actually want the reward, luxury, or privilege. is a system of who deserves what, often in an attempt to justify : If you want job security, you will have to work enough to earn it. Similarly, (or Manifest Destiny) is a narrative about what those of us who are considered US Americans deserve.

I will also add:

The have had . They initially came out of vegan analysis, but can be applied to any oppression. They act as support, and clues, to how we disconnect. and imply that there is nothing wrong (often deny/diagnose). refers to enjoying the privilege (in the original example, of eating meat),while implies that there is no other way (often demand/deserve). I underline necessary because however abnormal, unnatural, or mean we can think the system is, we often ignore it if we think there is no other way. Conversely, emphasizing how unnecessary a system is often helps to crumble the other narratives.

Intervene & (Re)Connect: Sovereignty & Self-Determination

Having discussed the ways we disconnect, the solutionary question is how to repair and prevent those disconnections. For this, we borrow from the individualist model of Comfort In, Dump Out. (I have also seen Care In, Crap Out.)

Ring Theory

In ring theory, the aggrieved or afflicted is at the center of a hardship or trauma. That person may freely dump or crap or vent all their feelings about all their unmet needs to most anyone. The folk on the outer rings are there to care, comfort, and support. Even a “lookie loo” may have strong feelings about the trauma the aggrieved person is experiencing, and may vent them, but only to another lookie loo.

How does this fit into systemic liberation? I would argue that this is an individualist representation of the concept of sovereignty, self-determination, or: .To intervene, we must center the needs and feelings of the folk most aggrieved. I feel great pain when see folk of color oppressed under racism: If we prioritize our own feelings and needs, especially if we come from a place of privilege, the attempts to intervene will likely only further oppress.

(so named for “National Socialism,” which was the Right’s successful attempt to co-opt the party and ), embedded in Libertarianism/Anarcho-Capitalism, (), (), (as opposed to Leftism), “

That is the best part: They have been telling us their needs for longer than these oppressions have been occurring. There are ample writings, speeches, videos, art, and infinite other expressions of needs from oppressed communities. Life cannot not express its needs. To attune to them, we need only listen, with our whole selves.

Or of “Disruption” — A “D” Word

After attuning to, or centering, the needs of the aggrieved, we are better positioned to act in a way that not only does not further violate their needs, but contributes to the oppressed’s needs and collective liberation. I first learned of the from in the context of street harassment, but they work in any situation of abuse or oppression. I often use school bullying as the example in my talks to schools.

The Fifth D

Since first writing this, Hollaback has added a fifth D to their analysis: . In their anti-harassment context, this means recording the interaction, or even serving as witness if the abuse goes to court. In a systems context, this may be keeping records of using official, legal channels of appeal, . It also includes in-depth understanding of the oppression, so that restorative justice or reparations may be more informed. This also anticipates the disconnection of denial. Imagine how much harder it would be to oppose Nazism .

Delegate

If we see abuse happening, we might not feel comfortable stepping in for whatever reason. Perhaps we are too afraid, or simply tired. We might then call upon someone who feels more comfortable. This person often has than we do. In school bullying, this could be a faculty person, or even simply a classmate less afraid. Whatever the situation, we the responsibility of intervention (disruption) to someone else, sometimes by just letting them know. Systemically, Together, they tell the public to intervene how we can. Another example: Every time we donate to some organization working for justice, we are delegating to them the power of that money, as they are hopefully better positioned to leverage it toward systemic change.

Delayed

Perhaps the abuse has already happened. I was too scared to do anything right then, but I want you to know I saw it, and that was not okay. Do you need anything? Again, it is important to center their needs in the conversation, and not, as a common example, offer unsolicited advice, which may simply further traumatize them. Additionally, Sometimes they will be more receptive to our intervention while not in the heat of their abuse, I heard what you said, and I want you to know that is not acceptable, or, I wonder if you know that language/behavior has a loaded history, or, I wonder what needs you were trying to meet, and how you might do so while still honoring the needs of others?

Again, these disruptions can be used in combination with each other. Any abuse, and other disruption, can be followed with a delayed disruption. Importantly, in restorative justice or any intervention, there need not be any thought of what anyone deserves: only focusing on the needs of everyone, and especially centering those of the abused.

Systemically, delayed intervention may look like including actually in the first place. Another example is In either of these, we cannot stop the injustices of histories of sexual assault and from having happened. But we may account/compensate for those injustices, in an effort to restore whatever justice possible.

Distract

is a more creative one. In street harassment, the common example is to ask the harasser for directions. In school bullying, it might be to ask about homework, or tell the bullier that a teacher is coming. Systemically, this can look like from an oppressor’s speech or ceremony. This tactic can also be used in electoral politics, by until the congressional session ends for example. to help facilitate the direct disruption, or as a consequence of it: If weapons manufacturers are they are not spending it on manufacturing weapons.

Direct (Compassionate)

We can, of course, walk into that abusive situation and stop it. I put Compassionate in parentheses because we often think of this as an attempt to hurt the abuser, but I have not found that to work very well: On an individual level, I prefer talking to them in a way that connects them to their own needs and feelings. NonViolent Communication distinguishes between This question is one of objective. Again, by focusing on the impulse to punish, we are caught up in Deserve thinking. Not only does this disconnect us from the abuser’s needs, but it also disconnects us from our own, as well as the needs of the person harmed. And while abusers may not win over our sympathy, the more unaware (disconnected) we are of their needs, the more we set ourselves up for later violence. This may look like backlash, for example, where we could instead achieve redemption.

, and better connect to the needs and feelings of others. In an individual setting, we may Perhaps they need a space to sit. Perhaps they want to be left alone, or to talk it through. Once that is resolved, we may ask the abuser, What are you trying to accomplish with your behavior? Eventually, we might get to what need they are trying to reach, and tactics to meet that need that do not disrupt others’ needs, as bullying does.

But what do we do systemically? Talk to the Nazis in government and war manufacturers about their needs until they stop? No. When we think of activism, we tend to picture , and with good reason. , if temporarily, and (what we do with that platform, we will get to). which fuel the movement. about the systems of oppression and their leverage points. Not only does a community directly caring for its own people after a flood directly address their immediate needs, it also puts immense pressure, with media attention, on the government to shape up their emergency responses: If this oppressed community can respond so well, why can’t the government?

Here again, I parenthesize Compassionate, though for a slightly different emphasis than in the individual setting. If war profiteers gain power and profit from their violence, NVDA intends to reduce that power and profit. This is the work of history, and takes large public action, but it is the work. So instead, I emphasize that the direct intervention be NVDA, or “Compassionate,” to focus the objective of the action on disrupting the oppression, and

A good rule of thumb is:This also includes attacking people online who mostly agree with our politics, trying to socially isolate them from the organizing community.

For example, them by making too much sound for them to be heard; that such a speech is not going to be tolerated without objection; host a party that the centrist public with the promise of joy in opposition to the oppressors’ appeals to fear; the auditorium seats so that impressionable folk do not listen to their ideology; with those impressionable folk, to help them process their internalized supremacy; or we might organize the protest the White Nationalists and their impressionable audience. This last objective carries the most risk. We face many variables we cannot control and may well “lose” the physical conflict, giving confident momentum to oppressors. It also positions the collective liberation movement extremely poorly in national media, and most importantly,

I will gladly advocate the power of organized self-defense. If something goes down at that protest, I will defend myself and my fellow liberationists. My point is that organizing a protest for the purpose of violence is a less effective strategy toward collective liberation than de-platforming or other means.

Three Always Things

There are times we will be stuck, or otherwise not know what to do. For those times, I offer what I call the three always things.

Research

We can always learn more. It must be matched with action, but if we are stuck, there are always more books to read or podcasts to listen to. If we do not know where to begin, Are you already antiracist? Did you know that the US military sends dozens of thousands air strikes every year to poorer, majority-Black/Brown nations, or regularly imposes fascist governments on foreign democracies, or that the Civil Rights Movement was led and supported by multitudes of Socialists? Are you already vegan? Did you know that one of the best things we can do to reduce animal suffering is empower undocumented folk of color, disproportionately hired in slaughterhouses, where they cannot unionize to slow down the “processing” of animals?

Support

We can always help others doing activism. We already discussed donations. You could wear a shirt that carries an organization’s name, or host a dinner to discuss their work. If you spend your life making tea and soup for fellow activists hit with the flu, you will have served the movement. You can even offer good old-fashioned emotional support, to help them process what is coming up for them. Activists are people, and we need love and soup.

Engage

It Works!

Finally, we can engage with others. Whether increasing cohesion among the die-hard Leftists, turning passive allies more active, winning over neutral folk, or arousing doubt among oppressors, relationships are the thing. In these conversations with others, I offer guidance from my own experience:

  1. anyone of anything. That will only backfire.
  2. by listening to their needs and feelings. Support the other person in connecting to themselves.
  3. Less important: Learn their talking points, and your own rhetoric.

Holding these, we might be surprised by what those conversations can do.

Outreach Insights

When Engaging

White supremacist AntiSocialism’s morality disgusts me. Its tactical lessons are also valuable. It weaponizes good research for the oppressive purpose of extracting profit for a few, but we can use that research for our own collective liberation. In that vein, marketing science has valuable lessons for people engaged in outreach of any kind.

Marketers understand that . The example often used is coffee. I can market the to you, by talking about the quality of the beans and the care in the roasting/drip process. I can market the to you by advertising how my café offers a relaxing atmosphere with massage chairs. And I can market the to you by emphasizing that the people who buy my coffee and hang out in my coffee shop are the creative professionals, the bohemian bourgeoisie, and by patronizing my establishment, you can network with them and become a successful creative professional too.

What marketers have learned is that Put another way:If I am looking for caffeine to fuel my extreme sports habit, I may not really care about the drip process, and feel turned off by some nerd telling me about it, who cannot read my disinterest. The lesson here is understanding how people respond to the movement. If you only care about energy for extreme sports, you might actually appreciate my nerdness when I tell you all about how the process maximizes caffeine extraction.

Together with the levels of engagement, advertisers also know that no one commercial is going to convince anyone of anything. Instead, they focus on exposures, impressions, and increasing the availability of the product in a person’s heart-mind.

Rather, by having conversations with them that normalize our ideology, this shifts such that maybe intersectional Socialism, or a moneyless, classless, stateless society is not so extreme. My point is:

DelapierceD

Social Emotional Leftist, M.Ed.

Pierce Delahunt

Written by

Social Emotional Leftist: If our Love & Light movements do not address systemic injustice, they are neither of those things

DelapierceD

Social Emotional Leftist, M.Ed.

Pierce Delahunt

Written by

Social Emotional Leftist: If our Love & Light movements do not address systemic injustice, they are neither of those things

DelapierceD

Social Emotional Leftist, M.Ed.

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store