Blockchain Interoperability: IBC and Why EVM Chains Prioritize Cross-Chain Connections

DragonStake
DragonStake | Blog

--

Learn about the importance of IBC in blockchain interoperability, and why EVM chains prioritize cross-chain connections. Explore the future of RWA tokenization and the role IBC plays in ensuring an open internet of blockchains.

Para la versión en español de este artículo, haga clic aquí.

In the world of blockchain, the concept of Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) has gained significant attention. IBC initially emerged as a trustless method for connecting Tendermint-based blockchains, but its scope has since expanded to encompass a wider range of blockchains, particularly those compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). These EVM-compatible chains, such as Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, Polkadot, and Avalanche, are showing a keen interest in integrating with the Cosmos ecosystem.

The Expanding Reach of IBC
IBC is making rapid strides in the blockchain space, with over 85 blockchain zones connected and a total transfer value of $4 billion in the last 30 days. Its influence is extending beyond the Cosmos ecosystem, encompassing various blockchain networks like Ethereum, Polkadot, and Avalanche.

As the number of blockchains continues to grow exponentially, the role of IBC in securely and permissionlessly connecting these networks becomes increasingly crucial. This is especially relevant in the context of the burgeoning digital asset market, estimated to reach up to $68 trillion by 2030. The reasons why EVM chains are turning their attention to IBC can be attributed to three key characteristics: diverse security models, dynamic connection capabilities, and a permissionless relayer system.

Diverse Security Models
One of the standout features of IBC is its ability to support various security models, as outlined in ICS-02. These models are tailored to meet the specific requirements of app chains and decentralized applications (dApps). While light client verification is often highlighted for its superior security, it’s essential to understand that it’s just one aspect of the IBC system.

For instance, the IBC protocol allows for the implementation of different security models, including zk-proof, TEE-proof, multi-sig, and light clients, based on the needs of individual applications or chains. This flexibility enables the setup of diverse security mechanisms, ensuring that security is never compromised, regardless of the blockchain’s unique demands.

Dynamic Connection Capabilities
Dynamic connection capabilities set IBC apart as an interoperability protocol designed for the internet of blockchains. Applications can establish IBC channels in a permissionless and instantaneous manner using pre-existing connections, as defined by ICS-03. This means that if a blockchain application on Chain A wishes to connect with apps on Chain B, it doesn’t need a direct connection. Instead, it can create a channel via connections owned by other blockchains, such as Chain C and Chain D, without requiring their permission.

These permissionless and dynamic connection capabilities are vital for expanding the network as the number of blockchains grows exponentially. Unlike non-IBC bridges that rely on specific bridge chains with permissioned connections, IBC ensures open and adaptable connectivity, making it an ideal solution for the evolving blockchain landscape.

Permissionless Relayer System
The permissionless relayer system within IBC plays a crucial role in facilitating secure packet transfers between chains through channels. Relayers are responsible for transferring packets between blockchains, focusing primarily on availability. The key distinction is that anyone can operate a relayer, leading to optimized packet relay costs based on demand and supply dynamics.

In contrast, blockchain networks heavily dependent on bridge chains lacking these IBC features may face suboptimal packet relay costs. These bridge chains are designed to maximize revenue and incentivize their token holders, potentially leading to increased fees and a lack of cost optimization.

IBC is rapidly expanding its reach and influence in the blockchain space, connecting over 85 blockchain zones with substantial transfer value. Its relevance extends to various blockchain networks beyond the Cosmos ecosystem, including Ethereum, Polkadot, and Avalanche. The reasons why EVM chains are paying attention to IBC can be traced back to its diverse security models, dynamic connection capabilities, and permissionless relayer system.

As the blockchain landscape continues to evolve, the need for secure and permissionless interchain communication becomes increasingly evident. IBC stands as the standard that possesses these essential attributes, ensuring that the internet of blockchains operates seamlessly and securely, without being controlled by a select few.

In closing, IBC’s expansion and adoption by various blockchain ecosystems underscore its pivotal role in shaping the future of blockchain interoperability. As the blockchain space continues to grow and diversify, the importance of secure and permissionless connectivity cannot be overstated, making IBC a crucial element in the evolving blockchain universe.

--

--