Becoming ‘Realistic’ about Reality

Published in

The Circular Theory

5 min readMay 15, 2023

Conservation of a circle produces the ‘constant’ variable. Also, known, as, (what humans experience as) ‘reality.’

Conservation of a circle is the baseline for what a human experiences as ‘reality.’ Where ‘reality’ from the circle’s point of view (and, therefore, from the human’s point of view) is a ‘constant’ variable. Meaning, technically, and realistically, the variable is constant. Everything changes. Nothing changes.

Realism

This is because a circle is one circumference and one diameter, where, technically, and, realistically, it is impossible to have a circumference without a diameter. Proving the symbol humans use to articulate a circle is completely incorrect.

So, this proves, completely, and, conclusively, that everything in (what humans experience as) ‘mathematics’ is (from Nature’s point of view) incorrect.

Again, this is because correct and incorrect (circumference and diameter), like everything in Nature, is the conservation of a circle.

So, where does this take us? And what does it get us?

Technically, there is no such thing as ‘us.’ Unless you realize, and-or recognize, that ‘us’ always refers to everything in Nature.

Idealism

So, Nature is the conservation of a circle. This is no surprise to ‘us.’ However, it also proves that ‘reality’ is the conservation of a circle. And, this, then, is, technically, a surprise, to, ‘all’ of, us.

Where the word ‘all’ is, technically, the circular-linear relationship between a whole and its parts. Where all of the constituents of Nature share a circular-linear relationship with Nature (a whole and its parts).

This is because it is impossible to have a half without a whole, and, always, vice versa.

Naturalism

So, this means everything a human observes is half and half (half and whole). And, now, you should be, and are, completely, and, technically, what humans label, ‘confused.’

However, since a human is a constituent of Nature, and, therefore representing all of Nature (and vice versa), the diagram is the only way to understand, and-or, articulate, this.

So, this means everything a human experiences as, in, with, for, about, because of (any and all prepositions) (what humans articulate and experience as) ‘Nature’ is articulated by the diagram (above and below) (where it is impossible to have above without below) (where it is impossible to have anything without its partner) (nothing).

That is, the diagram is a concrete abstraction for Nature (and any and-or all of its constituents).

PanPsychism

Again, this is because it is impossible to have concrete anything without abstract everything. Humans access everything using the concrete abstraction. Meaning humans are inventing everything on-the-fly using the conservation of a circle (technically pi-diameter-circumference as the correct technical articulation for one-two-three, X-Y-Z, X, Y, Z).

Where yin and yang (ancient) are zero and one (circumference and diameter) (modern). Proving there is only one ‘number’ in Nature (the number ‘two’) (everything else in mathematics: fictitious).

Where everything and anything in this article, including all of the alphanumeric symbols, all of the ‘representations’ (so-called), individual and group, singular and plural, the mathematical ‘numbers’ one and two, articulate, and, thus, conserve (demonstrate and prove), an uber-basic, technologically required, super-simple, circle.

Representationalism

Meaning, reality is arbitrary, programmed into humans by the conservation of a circle, because there is nothing else in Nature (and nothing else in ‘reality’) but the conservation of a circle.

Why you, and every other human on the planet, are demonstrating the conservation of a circle by the addictive, and, thus, continuous, concrete abstraction, constant variable, called a ‘smart phone.’

So, we will all be forced to take the time to study, analyze, experience, and, eventually, and, finally, accept, the conservation of a circle as the only dynamic in Nature.

Forget about everything in physics, philosophy, psychology, biology, technology, finance, politics, and the media (story-telling) (narrative creation, sublimation, and, therefore, appropriation).

Isolationism

Conservation of the Circle is the only thing you need to know about if you want to understand (what you are experiencing as) ‘reality.’ Your reality. Your lover’s reality. Your ‘hater’s’ reality. Your family’s reality. Your friend’s reality. Your enemy’s reality. Your teammate’s reality. Your boss’s reality. Your institution’s reality. Your country’s reality. Nature’s ‘reality.’

Sensationalism

There is a mandatory circular-linear relationship between life and death, the ‘real’ reality for all of the constituents in Nature. Which is what all of us are trying to avoid, and, eventually, accept, each and every ‘day.’ (Where Nature has no understanding, whatsoever, of, what a human experiences as, life, death, day, each, every.)

So, the next time a ‘human,’ and-or your ‘smart’ phone (and-or TV), causes an argument using any form of ‘language,’ step aside. Move away. Conservation of the Circle has you covered. (Language cannot ‘prove’ anything.’) (Gets all of us into trouble.) (Conserves a never-ending, half-the-time, therefore, all-the-time, non-productive, vicious, even though, sometimes, it will ‘appear,’ glorious, cycle).

We are moving (Nature is moving), all of us, now, to a completely ‘realistic’ understanding of ‘reality.’ Get on board. (Know it or not, like it or not, understand it or not, you are, already, ‘on board.’)

Conservation of the Circle is the only dynamic in Nature.