The Problem of Primordial Black Holes (and Force Carriers)
Science depends upon the decimal system, and, for technological ‘calculations,’ science also depends upon the binary system. Where neither the decimal system nor the binary system is known at all by Nature.
Nature is dependent on the Conservation of a Circle in order to survive.
Therefore, we have to use the Conservation of a Circle to solve the dark energy, and, also, gravity (general relativity) ‘problem.’ This includes the unification of dark energy (the black hole) with the force carrier.
First, what is the Conservation of a Circle and what does it look like?
Zero and-or One (Not a Basis Point)
Nature knows nothing about a ‘zero’ or a ‘one.’ And that means we cannot use either the decimal system or the binary system, if we want to solve astronomical problems (in physics) (in politics) (in life).
We have to start with how humans have dealt with their surroundings using ‘observation.’ That is, an observation can only be the circular-linear relationship between a circumference and a diameter.
This means, importantly, that the current understanding humans have about a circle is, decidedly, ‘wrong.’
Observation (Not Possible Without an Observer)
All people learn a circle is an equidistant set of points from a center-point (any point). The human draws a circumference to show this. So, here is the major flaw in all of science: a circumference cannot exist without a diameter. (A circle cannot exist without a line.)
So, that throws all of our (scientific and political) thinking into a circular-rimmed wastebasket. We have to go way back in time, to Euclid, and before, to solve this.
The correct diagram for a circle, and-or, a line, is, thus:
So, this gives us the correct diagram for observation:
Black Holes, Force Carriers, et al.
It, also, explains the black hole and the force carrier (and throws our current understanding of the atom, also, into the waste basket).
So, you can react to this your ‘self,’ and, perhaps you will find it ‘distasteful.’ Maybe ‘ridiculous.’
But that is only because you are conserving a circle when you say, no, that’s not correct (about anything). See ‘negation.’ Before moving forward (from Nature’s point of view, no moving ‘forward’).
Negation and-or Observation
So, yes, people could ‘hate’ this (on one level) because it disrupts our normal way of (sequential) (logical) ‘thinking.’
But obviously you cannot have a thought without a thinker (sorry, the diagram again). A non-believer without a believer. An X without X’.
So, if you want to keep up with this, great! In the sky we see black and white. With current astrophysics, we also see many other colors and we use these colors to ‘identify’ behavior (in order to categorize into structures).
Nature doesn’t know anything about categories (or colors, by the way).
Mathematics (any ‘language’), as it is currently practiced, was invented by humans, and is programmed into humans, and then applied by humans, in order to survive (monetary systems) (technological systems of all kinds).
However, scientists, and humans, want to get to the bottom of everything. We want to understand things in a way that makes sense.
Black and-or White (Circumference and-or Diameter)
So, go back to black and white, because dark energy is black and light energy is white, and there you have a conserved circular pair. This means we cannot go back to ‘the beginning of the universe.’ Even if scientific and technological calculations prove we can. (Sorry, scientists use a human-created (decimal) system for proof. This is circular logic, isn’t it?)
As an important aside, we’re using the decimal system in everything-AI. So, eventually Nature will use this against us, obviously, or we can figure out a way around it.
It’s all about the diagram. Whether you believe we can fix and-or understand things. Or not. Negation is a subtle form of duplication (again, sorry, Conservation of a Circle). X and not X is mandatory to have an idea, a thought, an opinion, a fact.
This means we have to have a brand-new way of ‘calculating’ where we are in space, technologically, and you can find this here.
Yes and-or No
The rest, now, is up to you. You have the understanding you need, and the understanding we all need, to move forward in the technological ‘time’ we have ‘created.’
Nature doesn’t care one way or the other. And you already totally understand (and-or believe) this. No matter if you are a scientist or not.
Because we are all constituents of, managed, and driven by, Nature. All of the tokenized systems we create, notwithstanding.
We already understand the Conservation of a Circle. Because we live it every single day:
Conservation of the Circle is the only dynamic in Nature. Giving us the solution, if we want to ‘go there,’ to all of the so-called ‘problems’ in science, to all of the so-called ‘problems’ in politics, including, and, especially, ‘world peace.’ (The avoidance of a 50–50 probable nuclear war.) (A 50–50 probability that we could experience a complete and ‘total’ breakdown of the global financial system.)
