Moving From Relativity to Circularity
Relativity gets us nothing as far as (human) reality is concerned.
The fact that everything is relative to everything else is, definitely, not a new idea. Einstein didn’t invent this idea. Neither did Heisenberg (or Born or Bohr or Schrödinger) (or any of the modern theoretical physicists).
Quantum Reality
In fact, all of the (so-called) ‘equations’ used to decipher ‘quantum mechanics’ were around long before ‘Christ.’ Where, technically, ‘Christ’ was the first physicist (well-documented (and studied) philosopher in those days) to point out tokenization is the core dynamic in Nature (father-son-holy ghost is pi-diameter-circumference).
Where tokenization always involves the required circular-linear relationship between the arithmetic numbers (experiences) called ‘one’ and-or ‘two.’
The equal sign (any function) articulates a circular-linear relationship (reality is a better word here). Meaning, technically (and, if you are a scientist, or a philosopher, you want to be (you need to be, actually) ‘technical’), the equal sign (any function) articulates a circular-linear reality (the universal system architecture called ‘Nature’):
So, technically (again), relativity is not possible without circularity, and, because of circularity (not because of relativity), vice versa.
Theoretical ‘Reality’
Einstein’s famous equation ‘c squared equals energy divided by mass’ is a simple substitution of Pythagoras’ famous theorem ‘pi equals circumference divided by diameter.’ (Where, technically, it is impossible to divide a circumference by a diameter (you need both to have either) (explaining why Pythagorean philosophers were stuck on the number ‘two’) (explaining why Christ took over from there by inventing the Schrödinger equation (the holy trinity) using it to preach about (think: guarantee) a unified (circular-linear) reality) (God is a technical term for ‘pi’) (pi is a technical term for, what humans experience as, ‘mind’) (the experience of mind proves the diagram below is the only representation (true tokenization) of (what humans experience as) ‘reality’).
Thus, the equal sign articulates pi, diameter, and-or circumference (something missed by middle eastern algebraists) (and all mathematicians (philosophers and physicists) since).
Circular Reality
If you understand this, or, if you take the time to think it through, you will understand why complementarity is essential for identity (the basis for everything in Christ’s work) (everything in all scientists’ and philosophers’ ‘work’) (why Plato and Aristotle disagreed (technically, why they agreed)) (all philosophers in the Middle East were aware of the Pythagorean theorem (and the problems it posed) (irrational numbers)) (nonetheless, the Egyptian pyramids proved both similarity and complementarity (are the result of a circular-linear reality)).
That is zero and one (yin and yang ancient) is circumference and diameter (literally and figuratively).
Thus, this is the only ‘reality’ (the ‘reality’ we are all working with) (the ‘reality we are all experiencing) (the reason tokenization is the only dynamic in Nature) (where tokenization is the continual representation of pi-diameter-circumference) (father-son-holy ghost) (the Schrödinger equation) (all equations):
And, thus, the conservation of a circle (perpetual tokenization) is the only dynamic in Nature. So, there you are (a tokenization of the conservation of a circle) (just like all the rest of ‘us’) (just like all the rest of Nature).
Everything about biomemetics… (and decisioning…)
See, also: Economic Freedom. And its relationship to technology (and… | by Ilexa Yardley | The Circular Theory | Oct, 2021 | Medium for more about Circularity in Nature (especially finance).
And: The Tokenization of Thought | by Ilexa Yardley | The Circular Theory | Oct, 2021 | Medium
An earlier version of Moving From Relativity to Circularity | by Ilexa Yardley | The Circular Theory | Medium (2018)…
Take the time to think it through:
