New Physics (Philosophy, Psychology)
‘Yin and Yang’ vs ‘Yin or Yang’. Correcting (Quantum) Technological (Mathematical) (Philosophical) (Psychological) Flaws
It is not possible to have yin or yang. The correct ‘expression’ is thus: yin and-or yang. (It is impossible to have ‘or’ without ‘and.’)
In the same way, it is impossible to have a solstice without an equinox (and, vice versa) and this is because it is impossible to have a circumference without a diameter.
Thus, it is impossible to have zero without one, exposing the major flaw in all of physics (technology, et. al.) (in all disciplines) (psychology) (philosophy) (finance) (biology) (chemistry) (politics) (mathematics).
Thus, new physics (and new mathematics) (and new psychology) (and new technology) (new cryptology) takes this into account (Quantum Entanglement on All Levels).
More simply, we need a new definition for the human word (and concept) called ‘space.’ You can find that here.
All the rest flows naturally.
Intellectual, Emotional, and Physical (Spiritual), Survival
Why we all need to consider this seriously: we are on the precipice (we are always on the precipice) of nuclear war, and the total disruption of global financial systems.
We are using a faulty assumption for (the ontology of) mathematics (the decimal system) (the binary system).
That is the number ‘one’ is impossible without the number ‘two.’ Therefore, ‘one’ and ‘two’ are, necessarily, and, always, entangled.
This puts us on the ‘road’ to global peace and prosperity (if we want to ‘go there’). Hint: we are already ‘there:’
Conservation of the Circle is the only dynamic in Nature.
