Homepage
Open in app
Sign in
Get started
Urbanism
Architecture
Infrastructure
Tech
Smart cities
Politics
Tagged in
Smart Cities
But what was the question?
Essays and journal entries concerning technology and the city. Title lifted from Cedric Price’s “Technology is the answer. But what was the question?”
More information
Followers
1.4K
Elsewhere
More, on Medium
Smart Cities
Dan Hill
in
But what was the question?
Feb 27, 2009
“Network + network + network = network”: Lift09 conference, and Geneva
It’s a crisp clear Swiss…
Read more…
Dan Hill
in
But what was the question?
Sep 10, 2018
A Cloud Atlas for Eindhoven, and believing in society over unicorns
Strijp-S and Woensel Noord…
Read more…
78
2 responses
Dan Hill
in
But what was the question?
Jan 15, 2008
The Personal Well-Tempered Environment
Sustainability and feedback loops, in the home and the city
Read more…
4
1 response
Dan Hill
in
But what was the question?
Aug 11, 2008
Two or three old diagrams about city information modelling
Early scribbles in urban informatics and smart cities
Ed. This piece was originally published at
cityofsound.com
on August 11th 2008.
Read more…
6
Dan Hill
in
But what was the question?
Oct 6, 2016
How should humans really be ‘in the loop’ in cities under autonomous mobility?
What questions lie…
Read more…
69
1 response
Dan Hill
in
But what was the question?
Sep 1, 2009
Teaching and drawing Urban Sensing
A lightweight teaching technique for perceiving, articulating and…
Read more…
12
Dan Hill
in
But what was the question?
Oct 12, 2009
Sensing the immaterial-material city
Drawing RFID, wifi, street markings, and painting the network
Read more…
4
Dan Hill
in
But what was the question?
Oct 2, 2015
Urban parasites, data-driven urbanism and the case for architecture
Read more…
58
1 response
Dan Hill
in
But what was the question?
Nov 3, 2014
Clockwork City, Responsive City, Predictive City and Adjacent Incumbents
Read more…
44
1 response
Dan Hill
in
But what was the question?
Feb 1, 2013
On the smart city
Or, a ‘manifesto’ for smart citizens instead
Read more…
60
1 response