Fractional Laplacian and Cognitive Modeling — Part 2

Freedom Preetham
Autonomous Agents
Published in
11 min readSep 2, 2023

The world of mathematics often intersects with seemingly unrelated fields, offering fresh perspectives and innovative solutions. One such intriguing intersection is the application of the fractional Laplacian in cognitive modeling.

In Part 1 of the blog titled “Fractional Elliptic Problems and Artificial General Intelligence,” I talk about the intricate relationship between fractional elliptic problems and the challenges of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is explored. In this article I suggest that the non-local nature of the fractional Laplacian might offer fresh insights and potential breakthroughs in AGI modeling.

Building on this foundation, I will delve deeper into the mathematical intricacies of the fractional Laplacian and its potential applications in cognitive modeling. In this blog, I’ll delve into this fascinating topic, drawing insights from several research papers to paint a comprehensive picture.

Non-local influence for AGI series

Part 1 — Fractional Elliptic Problems and Artificial General Intelligence

Part 2 — Fractional Laplacian and Cognitive Modeling

Part 3 — Randomized Algo and Spectral Decomposition for High-Dimensional Fractional Laplacians

Part 4 — Non Local Interactions in AGI through Weighted Choquard Equation

Part 5 — Integrating the Weighted Choquard with Fourier Neural Operators

1. The Allure of Non-local Operators

The fractional Laplacian, a non-local differential operator, stands at the forefront of modern mathematical research due to its unique properties and applications. Its non-local nature allows it to capture interactions over extended regions, making it a powerful tool for modeling systems with long-range dependencies.

1.1 Mathematical Definition and Insights

Let’s define a rigorous mathematical foundation for the fractional Laplacian. The operator is defined in terms of its action on a function (Paper 1):

Equation 1.1

Where Cs​ is a normalization constant dependent on s and the dimension d. This equation emphasizes the non-local nature of the operator, where the function’s value at a point x is influenced by its values over an extended region.

1.2 Spectral Properties and Insights

Let’s into the spectral properties of the fractional Laplacian. In the Fourier space, the fractional Laplacian acts as a multiplier (Paper 2):

Equation 1.2

Where F denotes the Fourier transform. This spectral representation provides a deeper understanding of the operator’s action, emphasizing its influence over a spectrum of frequencies.

1.3 Variational Formulation and Insights

The fractional Laplacian can also be understood through a variational formulation. Paper 3 introduces the associated energy functional:

Equation 1.3

Minimizing this energy leads to equations involving the fractional Laplacian. This variational perspective offers insights into the stability and behavior of solutions.

1.4 Boundary Behavior and Insights

The behavior of the fractional Laplacian near boundaries is a topic of significant interest. Paper 4 investigates this aspect, introducing a fractional boundary operator:

Equation 1.4

Where D is a bounded domain. This equation provides insights into how the fractional Laplacian interacts with boundaries, which is crucial for applications in bounded domains.

2. Long-term Dependencies: A Mathematical Perspective

The fractional Laplacian’s ability to model long-term dependencies is one of its most intriguing properties. This section will explore the mathematical underpinnings of this capability, drawing from the research papers.

2.1 Random Walks and the Fractional Laplacian

The connection between the fractional Laplacian and random walks, especially Lévy flights, is well-established. Lévy flights are a type of random walk where the step lengths have a heavy-tailed probability distribution. This allows for occasional long jumps, which can be seen as a mathematical representation of long-term dependencies.

From Paper 2, the probability density function of a Lévy flight in one dimension is given by:

Equation 2.1

Where s is the order of the fractional Laplacian. This equation showcases the non-local nature of the process, emphasizing the influence of distant points on the current state.

2.2 Time Evolution and Memory Effects

The time evolution of systems governed by the fractional Laplacian can exhibit memory effects. This is captured by the term F(u(x,tτ)) in the equation you provided, which represents the influence of past states on the current state.

From Paper 3, the memory kernel associated with the fractional Laplacian is given by:

Equation 2.2

Where ,1​ is the one-parameter Mittag-Leffler function, and α is related to the order of the fractional derivative. This kernel describes how past states decay in influence over time.

2.3 Fractional Time Derivatives and Long-term Dependencies

Incorporating fractional time derivatives can further enhance the modeling of long-term dependencies. From Paper 4, the fractional time derivative of order β is defined as:

Equation 2.3

Combining this with the spatial fractional Laplacian can lead to a comprehensive model capturing both spatial and temporal long-range interactions.

3. Neural Networks and the Fractional Laplacian

Neural networks, a cornerstone of modern artificial intelligence, are often used to model cognitive processes. The architecture of these networks, primarily based on local interactions, can sometimes limit their ability to capture long-range dependencies. The fractional Laplacian, with its inherent non-local nature, offers a promising avenue to enhance these models.

3.1 The Fractional Laplacian in Neural Dynamics

Consider a neural network with N neurons. The state of each neuron i at time t can be represented as ui​(t). The dynamics of this neuron, influenced by its neighboring neurons, can be described by:

Euqation 3.1.1

where wij​ represents the synaptic weight from neuron j to neuron i, and σ is a sigmoidal activation function.

Now, incorporating the fractional Laplacian, the dynamics become:

Equation 3.1.2

where wijs ​ is the fractional synaptic weight, influenced by non-local interactions. This can be represented as:

Equation 3.1.3

[*] This equation suggests that the change in synaptic weights in a neural network can be influenced by non-local interactions, potentially leading to more robust learning mechanisms.

3.2 Fractional Laplacian in Learning Algorithms

Incorporating the fractional Laplacian into the learning algorithms can enhance the network’s ability to capture long-term dependencies. The weight update rule in traditional backpropagation can be modified as:

Equation 3.2

where E is the error function, η is the learning rate, and the integral term introduces the non-local influence on the weight updates.

3.3 Implications for Deep Learning

Deep neural networks, with multiple layers, can particularly benefit from the fractional Laplacian. The non-local interactions can potentially mitigate the vanishing gradient problem, a challenge in deep learning, by ensuring that activations from distant layers have a more pronounced influence on the learning process.

Introducing the fractional Laplacian into the framework of DNNs can offer a potential solution to this problem. Let’s explore how:

Non-local Interactions and Gradients: The essence of the fractional Laplacian is its non-local nature. In the context of DNNs, this means that during backpropagation, the gradient at a particular layer is influenced not just by its immediate preceding layer but also by layers much earlier in the network. Mathematically, if ∇L represents the gradient of the loss function L, then with the fractional Laplacian, the gradient becomes:

Equation 3.3

where α is a constant, and s is the order of the fractional Laplacian. This equation ensures that the gradient at any layer is influenced by a broader context, potentially mitigating the vanishing gradient problem.

Enhanced Feature Propagation: In traditional DNNs, features extracted in the initial layers might lose their significance in deeper layers due to the local nature of interactions. With the fractional Laplacian, these features can have a more pronounced influence even in deeper layers, leading to richer feature representations.

Regularization and Generalization: The non-local interactions introduced by the fractional Laplacian can act as a form of regularization. By ensuring that the network considers a broader context, it can prevent the model from fitting too closely to the training data, potentially improving generalization to unseen data.

Potential for Fewer Layers: Given that the fractional Laplacian allows for broader interactions, it’s conceivable that DNNs designed with this in mind might achieve comparable performance with fewer layers, leading to more efficient models.

Mathematical Foundations: The introduction of the fractional Laplacian in DNNs is not just a heuristic but has a solid mathematical foundation. It ties back to the theory of fractional calculus, which generalizes traditional calculus to non-integer orders. This mathematical rigor ensures that the approach is grounded in well-established principles.

The fractional Laplacian offers a promising avenue for enhancing the training and performance of deep neural networks. By addressing challenges like the vanishing gradient problem and offering richer feature representations, it paves the way for more robust and efficient deep learning models.

4. Setting Boundaries with the Maximum Principle

The strong maximum principle is a foundational concept in the study of partial differential equations, especially in the context of elliptic problems. When it comes to fractional elliptic problems, this principle takes on a unique flavor, offering insights into the behavior of solutions within a given domain. Let’s delve deeper into this principle and its implications for cognitive modeling using the fractional Laplacian.

4.1 The Classical Maximum Principle

In classical elliptic theory, the maximum principle states that if u is a harmonic function (i.e., Δu=0) in a domain D, then any local maximum (or minimum) of u within D must occur on the boundary ∂D. Mathematically, this can be expressed as:

Equation 4.1

This principle is crucial because it provides information about the behavior of solutions without having to solve the differential equation explicitly.

4.2 The Fractional Strong Maximum Principle

For the fractional Laplacian, the strong maximum principle can be extended, but with some nuances. Given a function u that satisfies a fractional elliptic problem in domain D, the maximum (or minimum) of u within D is influenced by a broader context, not just the immediate boundary ∂D. This is due to the non-local nature of the fractional Laplacian.

Considering the equation:

Equation 4.2

where f is some function of u, the fractional strong maximum principle asserts that if u attains its maximum inside D, then u is constant throughout D.

4.3 Implications for Cognitive Modeling: A Mathematical Perspective

The implications of the fractional strong maximum principle for cognitive modeling extend beyond a mere conceptual understanding and find their roots in mathematical rigor. Let’s explore these implications more deeply, providing a rigorous mathematical foundation for each aspect.

4.3.1 Contextual Influence and Fractional Laplacian

As discussed through out the article, Consider a fractional elliptic problem in a bounded domain D⊂RN with a given boundary ∂D as (−Δ)su=f(u) in D.

The fractional Laplacian (−Δ)s is inherently non-local, taking into account contributions from distant points. When u attains its peak within D, the fractional strong maximum principle asserts that the cognitive state at that peak point is influenced by a broader context. Mathematically, this can be formalized as follows:

Let x_peak​ be the point where u attains its maximum within D. For any x in D, the fractional strong maximum principle implies that u(xpeak​) is influenced by the entire domain D through the non-local operator (−Δ)s. This influence ensures that the cognitive state at xpeak​ encapsulates information from a wider context, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of cognitive interactions.

4.3.2 Stability and Consistency

Stability is a fundamental requirement in cognitive modeling, as it ensures that cognitive processes remain consistent and bounded over time. The fractional strong maximum principle provides an inherent stability to solutions of fractional elliptic problems. This stability arises due to the non-local interactions encoded by the fractional Laplacian.

Mathematically, the stability of solutions is demonstrated by the principle’s assertion that if u attains its maximum within D, then u must be constant throughout D. This behavior prevents sudden, drastic changes in cognitive states and promotes a smooth, continuous evolution of cognitive processes. Consequently, cognitive models built upon the fractional Laplacian can accurately capture stable cognitive interactions.

4.3.3 Boundary Interactions and Cognitive Limits

In cognitive modeling, boundaries often represent critical points such as thresholds, limits, or transitions between different cognitive states. The fractional strong maximum principle lends insight into how these boundaries interact with the cognitive states within the domain.

Mathematically, when u attains its maximum within D, the principle ensures that the maximum state at the boundary ∂D influences the cognitive state within D. This interaction between the boundary and the interior emphasizes the importance of boundary conditions and their impact on the overall cognitive dynamics. It underscores the role of boundaries in shaping cognitive behaviors and provides a rigorous foundation for understanding cognitive limits.

4.3.4 Mathematical Rigor and Research

The mathematical rigor behind these implications is firmly grounded in functional analysis, potential theory, and advanced methods in partial differential equations. Research in Paper 1 and Paper 2 provides rigorous proofs and analytical insights that underpin the validity of the fractional strong maximum principle and its consequences.

4.3.5 Discussion

Incorporating the fractional strong maximum principle into cognitive modeling enhances the mathematical rigor and robustness of the modeling process. The principle’s implications for contextual influence, stability, and boundary interactions offer not only conceptual clarity but also concrete mathematical foundations for understanding cognitive processes. By embracing the inherent non-locality of the fractional Laplacian, cognitive modeling can achieve a higher level of precision and predictive power, thus contributing to the advancement of cognitive science and its applications.

Wrapping Up

In my honest belief, the intricate mathematical framework provided by the fractional Laplacian offers a robust foundation for modeling complex cognitive processes. By leveraging these advanced equations and drawing from extensive research, we gain a nuanced understanding of the fractional Laplacian’s potential in cognitive modeling.

Hope I could show how this integration enables us to tackle intricate challenges and unveil novel insights. The convergence of mathematics and cognitive science opens doors to transformative solutions and uncharted possibilities. As mathematics continues to intersect with diverse fields, the prospects for groundbreaking advancements remain compelling.

The exploration of fractional Laplacian implications in cognitive modeling symbolizes a scientific journey that promises innovative revelations. Through this fusion of mathematics and cognition, we engage in a quest that illuminates new perspectives, reshapes paradigms, and fuels progress across disciplines.

Disclaimer

Freedom Preetham is an AI Researcher with background in math and quantum physics and working on genomics in particular. You are free to use and expand on this research idea as applicable to other domains. Attribution to Freedom Preetham is welcome if you find it useful.

--

--