Tagged in

Science


周保松教授關於《宗教與科學》討論會的記述

同意一點,當晚討論的氛圍比各人(包括聽眾)的設想都要好。如我自己便是食住花生等睇關陳二人拆招的。但當晚四位講員的確是嘗試將宗教與科學各大矛盾點鋪陳出來。同行友人說王偉雄「讀神學嘥時間」論是 arrogance,我同意。但他站在對宗教(基督教?)的鄙夷和敵意來立論,卻也為講座生色不少。

關陳二人仍然嘗試以一般護教方式立論,雖也可滿足今次講座的需要,但在促進對話而言又略嫌不足。


Sunday Science: Quantum Mechanics

This week, scientists reportedly brought “nonsensical” quantum physics into the real world for the first time. Is quantum physics really nonsensical? Or do we just need an Ironman Lego figure to help us truly understand it?

What is quantum…


http://www.hairlosspropecia.org/vlamorous/

vlamorou sRight when your vlamorous starts giving against developing proposals, you think vlamorouss and stuff like vlamorous don’t work. You consider decisions like botox and implantations. Botox is on a very basic level an invention vlamorous is imbued…